Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CLOUD.OL Cloudberry Clean Energy ASAOpen in the cockpit ↗

Cloudberry Clean Energy ASACLOUD.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Momentum strong 68
Mkt cap
$645M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
36%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$627,923
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-7.1 pp
WACC 7.9%
Hurdle
-127 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
102 days
16 Feb 2027
Close · NOKNOK 13.00
1D-0.1%
1W+1.4%
1M+13.6%
3M-1.1%
6M+1.6%
YTD+1.1%
1Y+3.5%
ATR %2.9%
52w lowhigh5.7% off high

What Cloudberry Clean Energy does

No business profile yet.

Cloudberry Clean Energy at a glance

Size Cloudberry Clean Energy (CLOUD.OL) is a Norway Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $645M, the 76th largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 13.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 1.6%, against -17.0% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 78.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.3%); the operating margin is 13.8% (peer median 8.8%).

Valuation It trades at 14.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.8× (4th most expensive of 12).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 42% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +169%, so the hurdle is -127 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.1 points below its cost of capital (7.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CLOUD.OL 100Peer median 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Cloudberry Clean Energy against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Cloudberry Clean Energy financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 686MNOK 511MNOK 382MNOK 333MNOK 208M
Revenue growth—+34%+15%+60%—
Gross profitNOK 166M-NOK 49.0MNOK 37.0MNOK 42.0MNOK 46.0M
EBITDANOK 317MNOK 211MNOK 91.0MNOK 68.0MNOK 22.0M
Net incomeNOK 180MNOK 61.0MNOK 96.0MNOK 272MNOK 118M
Free cash flowNOK 188MNOK 102M-NOK 53.0M-NOK 266M-NOK 242M
Capital expenditureNOK 215MNOK 219MNOK 276MNOK 535MNOK 304M
Total debtNOK 3.71BNOK 3.34BNOK 1.99BNOK 1.62BNOK 382M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Cloudberry Clean Energy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-75%-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%1965MG1871300388002482301058F9D001210TRANSRAILLLMB55349621591117571939DBLCDNL2535CLOUD.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Cloudberry Clean Energy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%10×20×MG300388301058F9DTRANSRAILLLMB55345911DBLCDNLCLOUD.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Cloudberry Clean Energy is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%100%1965MG300388002482301058TRANSRAILL5911CLOUD.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Cloudberry Clean Energy is the large dot.

Cloudberry Clean Energy competitors and peer comparison

How Cloudberry Clean Energy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Cloudberry Clean Energy against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCLOUD.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+13.6%-6.7%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+1.6%-17.0%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-5.7%-32.8%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+78.7%+7.3%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin13.8%8.8%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E14.4×11.8×4th most expensive of 12
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)41.7%-0.2%most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+168.9%+4.1%highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-127.2 pp-8.6 ppleast demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.1 pp+2.1 pp2nd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA33.9×6.9×most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA9.4×-0.5×most indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Cloudberry Clean Energy CLOUD.OLNorway$645M+2%+79%14%14.4×41.7%+168.9%
Techno Ryowa 1965.TJapan$644M+12%+14%16%n/a-11.0%+12.5%
Mistras MGUnited States$642M+14%+5%7%16.4×7.6%+4.1%
PS Construction 1871.TJapan$656M-17%+6%9%n/an/an/a
Cecep Guozhen Environmental Protection Technology 300388.SZChina$632M-22%+5%18%11.8×-2.0%-1.0%
Shenzhen Grandland 002482.SZChina$658M-32%+46%-4%n/a24.9%-33.5%
COFCO Technology & Industry 301058.SZChina$630M-17%+3%8%17.2×-3.5%+8.4%
Boustead Singapore F9D.SISingapore$662M-35%+18%12%9.3×-11.4%-1.9%
Kingfore Energy 001210.SZChina$662M+32%+15%12%n/a13.4%+9.6%
Transrail Lighting TRANSRAILL.NSIndia$628M-25%+14%11%10.5×5.9%+25.9%
Limbach LMBUnited States$627M-36%+21%6%11.7×12.6%+2.6%
Chong Hong Development 5534.TWTaiwan$625M-16%-18%24%2.8×n/an/a
CTI Engineering 9621.TJapan$619M+22%+8%9%12.0×-9.0%+9.2%
Beijing SPC Environment Protection Tech 002573.SZChina$619M-22%+1%-2%n/a5.2%+13.7%
Yokogawa Bridge 5911.TJapan$679M-6%+4%8%12.9×-12.8%+1.1%
Global Chinese Business Club 1757.HKHong Kong$610M-78%+121%1%n/an/an/a
Yondenko 1939.TJapan$685M+10%+7%11%n/a1.1%+2.1%
Dilip Buildcon DBL.NSIndia$688M-17%-19%16%25.7×n/an/a
Cardinal Infrastructure CDNLUnited States$691M-73%+90%8%6.8×n/an/a
Da-Cin Construction 2535.TWTaiwan$693M+23%+36%8%n/a-10.6%+7.9%
Zhejiang Yasha Decoration 002375.SZChina$695M-16%-25%6%n/a-0.2%-3.3%

Questions

Which companies are Cloudberry Clean Energy's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Techno Ryowa (1965.T), Mistras (MG), PS Construction (1871.T), Cecep Guozhen Environmental Protection Technology (300388.SZ), Shenzhen Grandland (002482.SZ), COFCO Technology & Industry (301058.SZ), Boustead Singapore (F9D.SI), Kingfore Energy (001210.SZ).
Is Cloudberry Clean Energy expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.4× against a peer median of 11.8×, 4th most expensive of 12 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 42% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +169%, so the hurdle is -127 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Cloudberry Clean Energy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +1.6% against -17.0% for the median peer; over one year +3.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.