Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1871.T PS Construction Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

PS Construction Co., Ltd.1871.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Momentum neutral 44
Mkt cap
$656M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
32%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.37M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+7.5 pp
WACC 5.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥2,212
1D-7.1%
1W-7.1%
1M+7.9%
3M-3.2%
6M-17.4%
YTD-22.7%
1Y+19.9%
ATR %4.1%
52w lowhigh37.7% off high

What PS Construction does

Employees: 1,624

PS Construction at a glance

Size PS Construction (1871.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $656M, the 930th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,212 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 17.4%, against -15.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.3%); the operating margin is 9.2% (peer median 8.8%).

Valuation It trades at 0.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.0× (4th cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.5 points above its cost of capital (5.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 841871.T 83
Six months, rebased to 100: PS Construction against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

PS Construction financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥146B¥149B¥136B¥129B¥109B
Revenue growth—+10%+5%+18%—
Gross profit¥25.6B¥24.7B¥23.0B¥18.8B¥15.5B
EBITDA¥14.6B¥14.1B¥13.5B¥8.96B¥6.75B
Net income¥9.65B¥9.33B¥8.22B¥5.05B¥3.79B
Free cash flown/a-¥18.7B¥14.9B¥13.9B-¥18.3B
Capital expendituren/a¥1.20B¥1.00B¥2.11B¥1.60B
Total debt¥26.0B¥29.2B¥19.6B¥21.1B¥30.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

PS Construction competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%002482F9D001210CLOUD1965MG5911300388301058TRANSRAILL1939LMB5534DBLCDNL253596213011151871.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. PS Construction is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%2×4×002482F9D001210CLOUD1965MG5911300388301058TRANSRAILL5534DBLCDNL25350025730023753011151871.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. PS Construction is the large dot.

PS Construction competitors and peer comparison

How PS Construction compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

PS Construction against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1871.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.9%-6.7%3rd highest of 21
6-month return-17.4%-15.7%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-37.7%-31.2%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.7%+7.3%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin9.2%8.8%11th highest of 21
EV / Sales0.8×1.0×4th cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.5 pp+1.1 pp6th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.5×6.9×7th most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA0.4×-0.4×7th most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
PS Construction 1871.TJapan$656M-17%+6%9%0.8×n/an/a
Shenzhen Grandland 002482.SZChina$658M-32%+46%-4%2.4×24.9%-33.5%
Boustead Singapore F9D.SISingapore$662M-35%+18%12%0.9×-11.4%-1.9%
Kingfore Energy 001210.SZChina$662M+32%+15%12%3.2×13.4%+9.6%
Cloudberry Clean Energy CLOUD.OLNorway$645M+2%+79%14%15.7×41.7%+168.9%
Techno Ryowa 1965.TJapan$644M+12%+14%16%0.8×-11.0%+12.5%
Mistras MGUnited States$642M+14%+5%7%1.1×7.6%+4.1%
Yokogawa Bridge 5911.TJapan$679M-6%+4%8%0.8×-12.8%+1.1%
Cecep Guozhen Environmental Protection Technology 300388.SZChina$632M-22%+5%18%3.5×-2.0%-1.0%
COFCO Technology & Industry 301058.SZChina$630M-17%+3%8%0.9×-3.5%+8.4%
Transrail Lighting TRANSRAILL.NSIndia$628M-25%+14%11%0.8×5.9%+25.9%
Yondenko 1939.TJapan$685M+10%+7%11%0.9×1.1%+2.1%
Limbach LMBUnited States$627M-36%+21%6%1.1×12.6%+2.6%
Chong Hong Development 5534.TWTaiwan$625M-16%-18%24%4.2×n/an/a
Dilip Buildcon DBL.NSIndia$688M-17%-19%16%0.7×n/an/a
Cardinal Infrastructure CDNLUnited States$691M-73%+90%8%1.4×n/an/a
Da-Cin Construction 2535.TWTaiwan$693M+23%+36%8%0.9×-10.6%+7.9%
CTI Engineering 9621.TJapan$619M+22%+8%9%0.6×-9.0%+9.2%
Beijing SPC Environment Protection Tech 002573.SZChina$619M-22%+1%-2%1.7×5.2%+13.7%
Zhejiang Yasha Decoration 002375.SZChina$695M-16%-25%6%0.7×-0.2%-3.3%
United Testing Inspection And Certification Technology 301115.SZChina$702M+22%+5%-1%3.0×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are PS Construction's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shenzhen Grandland (002482.SZ), Boustead Singapore (F9D.SI), Kingfore Energy (001210.SZ), Cloudberry Clean Energy (CLOUD.OL), Techno Ryowa (1965.T), Mistras (MG), Yokogawa Bridge (5911.T), Cecep Guozhen Environmental Protection Technology (300388.SZ).
Is PS Construction expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.8× against a peer median of 1.0×, 4th cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has PS Construction stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -17.4% against -15.7% for the median peer; over one year +19.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.