Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › NWH.AX NRW Holdings LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

NRW Holdings LimitedNWH.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Provides contract mining and civil construction services to the resources sector across Australia.

≈ A mining-services/civil-construction contractorMomentum laggard 19
Mkt cap
$1.95B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.76M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+7.1 pp
WACC 10.5%
Hurdle
-6 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
103 days
17 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$6.09
1D-3.3%
1W-3.3%
1M-20.6%
3M-16.8%
6M-17.3%
YTD+18.2%
1Y+23.8%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh27.8% off high

What NRW does

Provides contract mining and civil construction services to the resources sector across Australia.

Charges mine owners per tonne moved or per unit of work under multi-year contracts, using its own heavy-equipment fleet. Civil and processing-plant engineering are project work won by tender. It grew into a broader services group through acquisitions of Golding, a contract miner, and Primero, a processing-plant builder.

In one line: A mining-services/civil-construction contractor.

Products and services

  • Contract mining services
  • Civil construction
  • Mineral processing/engineering

Customers

  • Mining companies
  • Government/infrastructure clients

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Mine planning/civil engineering
  • Contract mining operations
  • Civil construction delivery

What could go right

  • Mining production/capex growth
  • Civil infrastructure project wins

What could go wrong

  • Mining capex cyclicality
  • Contract margin pressure

Moat: narrow (scale, customer qualification). Multi-year mining services contracts and heavy equipment fleet create switching costs for mine owners.

Headquarters: Perth, Australia · Founded: 1994 · Employees: 13,300

Named competitors

NRW at a glance

Size NRW (NWH.AX) is an Australia Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $1.95B, the 120th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$6.09 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 17.3%, against -13.6% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 31.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.1%); the operating margin is 5.6% (peer median 9.1%).

Valuation It trades at 13.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.1× (8th most expensive of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -6 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.1 points above its cost of capital (10.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 86NWH.AX 81
Six months, rebased to 100: NRW against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

NRW financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$4.29BA$4.29BA$3.27BA$2.91BA$2.67B
Revenue growth—+31%+12%+9%—
Gross profitA$827MA$827MA$479MA$457MA$432M
EBITDAA$455MA$514MA$249MA$322MA$268M
Net incomeA$153MA$153MA$27.7MA$105MA$85.6M
Free cash flowA$182MA$182MA$107MA$40.7MA$63.6M
Capital expenditureA$151MA$151MA$154MA$195MA$187M
Total debtn/aA$585MA$411MA$325MA$312M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

NRW competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%1719MND1961600072601827990060177803711980052690694439280020606691KIEENGINERSINIRB002081NWH.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. NRW is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%20×40×1719MND1961601827PAAL-B037119800526906944BDGI0020606691ENGINERSINIRB002081NWH.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. NRW is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%1719MND1961601827PAAL-B037119806944BDGI6691ENGINERSINIRB002081NWH.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. NRW is the large dot.

NRW competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (NWH.AX vs MAH.AX vs MND.AX vs PRN.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
NRW NWH.AX$1.95B-17%+31%6%13.6×8.5%
Macmahon MAH.AX$1.35B+6%+8%7%15.1×4.3%
Monadelphous MND.AX$1.98B-4%+29%5%22.7×5.3%
Perenti PRN.AX$1.31B-8%-4%9%10.3×-9.8%

How NRW compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

NRW against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureNWH.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.6%-5.3%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-17.3%-13.6%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-27.8%-29.9%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+31.4%+4.1%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin5.6%9.1%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E13.6×13.1×8th most expensive of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.5%-0.6%5th most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.1%+6.0%4th highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.6 pp-12.3 pp7th most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.1 pp+0.6 pp8th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA6.8×12.2×3rd cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA0.6×-1.1×5th most indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
NRW NWH.AXAustralia$1.95B-17%+31%6%13.6×8.5%+14.1%
HAZAMA ANDO 1719.TJapan$1.94B-11%+4%8%9.8×-11.7%+4.5%
Monadelphous MND.AXAustralia$1.98B-4%+29%5%22.7×5.3%+9.7%
Sanki Engineering 1961.TJapan$1.98B-12%+2%12%11.5×-6.5%+6.0%
CSSC Science & Technology 600072.SSChina$1.99B-35%+8%-37%n/an/an/a
Chongqing Sanfeng Environment 601827.SSChina$2.00B-3%+5%27%10.4×-11.4%+2.4%
Per Aarsleff Holding A/S PAAL-B.CODenmark$2.02B-6%+14%5%13.4×-7.6%+11.2%
Hong Kong Zcloud Technology Construction 9900.HKHong Kong$2.03B+16%-33%0%n/an/an/a
Jinko Power Technology 601778.SSChina$1.86B-49%-25%16%n/an/an/a
Beijing Enterprises Water 0371.HKHong Kong$1.86B-48%-5%24%9.5×4.2%-1.2%
DAI-DAN 1980.TJapan$2.05B-15%-7%14%10.2×-4.4%+10.2%
Kepco E&c 052690.KSSouth Korea$2.07B-61%+8%10%45.6×n/an/a
Mega Union Technology 6944.TWTaiwan$1.82B-17%+60%21%14.1×-4.0%+30.2%
China Next-Gen Commerce and Supply Chain 3928.HKHong Kong$1.81B+47%-26%-17%n/an/an/a
Badger Infrastructure Solutions BDGI.TOCanada$1.80B-10%+16%8%19.2×21.0%+15.8%
Guangdong Construction Engineering 002060.SZChina$1.79B-15%-11%3%8.0×n/an/a
Yankey Engineering 6691.TWTaiwan$2.16B-16%+63%16%9.7×2.8%+33.1%
Kier KIE.LUnited Kingdom$1.75B+53%+7%3%12.7×-6.3%+5.9%
Engineers India ENGINERSIN.NSIndia$1.74B+12%+6%20%25.2×29.6%+4.6%
IRB Infrastructure Developers IRB.NSIndia$2.18B-21%-14%27%16.0×9.2%+4.2%
Suzhou Gold Mantis Construction and Decoration 002081.SZChina$1.74B-25%-8%3%29.6×12.2%-11.1%

Questions

Who are NRW's main competitors?
Named competitors: Macmahon Holdings (MAH.AX), Monadelphous Group (MND.AX), Perenti Limited (PRN.AX). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes HAZAMA ANDO (1719.T), Monadelphous (MND.AX), Sanki Engineering (1961.T), CSSC Science & Technology (600072.SS), Chongqing Sanfeng Environment (601827.SS), Per Aarsleff Holding A/S (PAAL-B.CO).
Is NRW expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.6× against a peer median of 13.1×, 8th most expensive of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -6 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has NRW stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -17.3% against -13.6% for the median peer; over one year +23.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.