Loading…

Kier Group plcKIE.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

UK construction and infrastructure services group building and maintaining roads, utilities and public buildings.

≈ A UK diversified construction/infrastructure contractorMomentum leader 95
Mkt cap
$1.75B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
93%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.37M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+15.1 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
-12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB+ / B+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£314.20
1D+2.3%
1W+1.9%
1M+8.8%
3M+25.9%
6M+53.1%
YTD+41.5%
1Y+49.6%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh2.7% off high

What Kier does

UK construction and infrastructure services group building and maintaining roads, utilities and public buildings.

Much of its work comes through multi-year framework agreements, panels of approved suppliers set up by public bodies, from which individual contracts are then awarded; highways maintenance follows that route. After a debt crisis in 2018-19 it sold off housebuilding and other units and now concentrates on construction and infrastructure.

In one line: A UK diversified construction/infrastructure contractor.

Products and services

  • Construction (buildings)
  • Infrastructure services (highways, utilities)
  • Property development

Customers

  • UK government & local authorities
  • Private developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Construction & infrastructure services
  • Buildings, highways, utilities

What could go right

  • UK infrastructure investment programs

What could go wrong

  • Thin construction margins
  • History of balance-sheet stress

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Long-term UK infrastructure maintenance contracts provide recurring, sticky revenue.

Headquarters: Rugby, UK · Founded: 1928 · Employees: 10,000

Named competitors

Kier at a glance

Size Kier (KIE.L) is a United Kingdom Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $1.75B, the 173rd largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £314.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 53.1%, against -9.5% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.8% over the last twelve months (peer median -2.0%); the operating margin is 3.3% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 12.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.3× (6th cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.1 points above its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Credit Kier has 1 bond outstanding ($334M), rated BB+ by the agencies and trading like B+ at a weighted spread of 264 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014016011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026KIE.L 155Peer median 89
Six months, rebased to 100: Kier against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kier financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue£4.35B£4.35B£4.08B£3.91B£3.38B
Revenue growth—+7%+4%+16%—
Gross profit£381M£381M£315M£319M£298M
EBITDA£229M£229M£220M£187M£173M
Net income£61.7M£61.7M£56.4M£42.7M£41.1M
Free cash flow£183M£183M£183M£190M£140M
Capital expenditure£14.6M£14.6M£18.4M£27.9M£8.40M
Total debtn/a£1.85B£1.64B£1.58B£1.51B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kier competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%-10%0%+10%ENGINERSIN002081TEA1414BRKN19412068002060BDGINCC-A39281783694465440004980371601778IMPN1417KIE.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kier is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×ENGINERSIN002081TEA1414BRKN19412068002060BDGINCC-A694465440004980371002051KIE.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kier is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%ENGINERSIN002081TEA1414BRKN19412068BDGINCC-A6944654403711417KIE.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kier is the large dot.

Kier competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (KIE.L vs MGNS.L vs BBY.L vs COST.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kier KIE.L$1.75B+53%+7%3%12.7×-6.3%
Morgan Sindall MGNS.L$2.77B-7%+11%5%11.7×-4.7%
Balfour Beatty BBY.L$5.34B+1%+12%2%17.2×1.0%
Costain COST.L$890M+30%-6%5%16.5×0.1%

How Kier compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kier against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKIE.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+8.8%-1.7%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+53.1%-9.5%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-2.7%-26.9%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.8%-2.0%8th highest of 21
Operating margin3.3%6.5%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E12.7×16.3×6th cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-6.3%4.1%3rd least demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.9%+4.4%6th highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-12.2 pp-6.0 pp6th least demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+15.1 pp+1.0 pp4th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA5.4×12.8×cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-0.2×0.3×5th least indebted of 13
Bond spread264 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kier KIE.LUnited Kingdom$1.75B+53%+7%3%12.7×-6.3%+5.9%
Engineers India ENGINERSIN.NSIndia$1.74B+12%+6%20%25.2×29.6%+4.6%
Suzhou Gold Mantis Construction and Decoration 002081.SZChina$1.74B-25%-8%3%29.6×12.2%-11.1%
Tasmea TEA.AXAustralia$1.73B+49%+136%8%18.9×4.6%+59.3%
SHO BOND 1414.TJapan$1.71B-6%-2%23%16.3×-7.5%+2.2%
Burkhalter BRKN.SWSwitzerland$1.71B-27%-2%6%21.5×-1.3%+19.0%
Chudenko 1941.TJapan$1.71B+3%+9%12%11.0×-8.6%+4.3%
China Aluminum International Engineering 2068.HKHong Kong$1.71B-39%-6%4%13.3×11.9%-0.6%
Guangdong Construction Engineering 002060.SZChina$1.79B-15%-11%3%8.0×n/an/a
Badger Infrastructure Solutions BDGI.TOCanada$1.80B-10%+16%8%19.2×21.0%+15.8%
NCC NCC-A.STSweden$1.69B-3%-17%3%22.2×-1.6%+0.7%
China Next-Gen Commerce and Supply Chain 3928.HKHong Kong$1.81B+47%-26%-17%n/an/an/a
Envision Greenwise 1783.HKHong Kong$1.68B+38%+183%3%n/an/an/a
Mega Union Technology 6944.TWTaiwan$1.82B-17%+60%21%14.1×-4.0%+30.2%
Japan Elevator Service 6544.TJapan$1.65B-9%+17%19%29.3×4.0%+18.6%
Shandong Hi-speed Road&bridge 000498.SZChina$1.65B+20%-9%7%4.9×n/an/a
Beijing Enterprises Water 0371.HKHong Kong$1.86B-48%-5%24%9.5×4.2%-1.2%
Jinko Power Technology 601778.SSChina$1.86B-49%-25%16%n/an/an/a
Implenia IMPN.SWSwitzerland$1.61B+12%-8%2%15.0×6.0%-2.7%
MIRAIT ONE 1417.TJapan$1.60B-24%+5%6%10.4×-5.7%+5.4%
China CAMC Engineering 002051.SZChina$1.58B-15%+14%5%40.3×n/an/a

Kier bonds and credit

Kier has 1 bond outstanding with $334M face value. The agencies rate it BB+; its bonds trade like B+. Weighted yield 7.24%, a spread of 264 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Kier's main competitors?
Named competitors: Morgan Sindall Group (MGNS.L), Balfour Beatty (BBY.L), Costain Group (COST.L). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Engineers India (ENGINERSIN.NS), Suzhou Gold Mantis Construction and Decoration (002081.SZ), Tasmea (TEA.AX), SHO BOND (1414.T), Burkhalter (BRKN.SW), Chudenko (1941.T).
Is Kier expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.7× against a peer median of 16.3×, 6th cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Kier stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +53.1% against -9.5% for the median peer; over one year +49.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.