Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › TEA.AX Tasmea LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Tasmea LimitedTEA.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Provides industrial maintenance and engineering services to the mining and resources sector in Western Australia.

≈ A WA-focused mining-services/maintenance contractorMomentum leader 82
Mkt cap
$1.73B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
41%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.56M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+12.0 pp
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
-55 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · AUDA$8.90
1D-2.2%
1W-4.8%
1M-15.2%
3M+2.3%
6M+48.8%
YTD+111.4%
1Y+83.5%
ATR %6.4%
52w lowhigh24.4% off high

What Tasmea does

Provides industrial maintenance and engineering services to the mining and resources sector in Western Australia.

In one line: A WA-focused mining-services/maintenance contractor.

Products and services

  • Mechanical/industrial maintenance
  • Engineering services

Customers

  • Mining/resources companies in Western Australia

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial/mechanical engineering
  • Maintenance services delivery
  • Sale to resources-sector clients

What could go right

  • WA mining/resources maintenance demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Mining capex cyclicality
  • Contract concentration in a few large clients

Moat: none (customer qualification). Established client relationships in WA resources maintenance, a fragmented and competitive services market.

Headquarters: Perth, Australia · Employees: 8,000

Named competitors

Tasmea at a glance

Size Tasmea (TEA.AX) is an Australia Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $1.73B, the 134th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$8.90 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 48.8%, against -9.5% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 136.0% over the last twelve months (peer median -2.0%); the operating margin is 7.9% (peer median 6.1%).

Valuation It trades at 18.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.0× (8th most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +59%, so the hurdle is -55 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 12.0 points above its cost of capital (6.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026TEA.AX 148Peer median 89
Six months, rebased to 100: Tasmea against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Tasmea financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$1.29BA$1.29BA$548MA$400MA$320M
Revenue growth—+136%+37%+25%—
Gross profitA$222MA$222MA$143MA$103MA$73.2M
EBITDAA$126MA$126MA$81.8MA$60.6MA$35.9M
Net incomeA$71.3MA$71.3MA$53.1MA$30.4MA$19.3M
Free cash flowA$64.6MA$64.6MA$31.5MA$20.8MA$7.43M
Capital expenditureA$26.5MA$26.5MA$15.0MA$22.2MA$11.0M
Total debtn/aA$155MA$140MA$65.7MA$57.5M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tasmea competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%-10%0%+10%002081ENGINERSIN1414KIEBRKN19412068NCC-A1783002060BDGI392865440004986944IMPN03716017781417TEA.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tasmea is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×002081ENGINERSIN1414KIEBRKN1941NCC-A002060BDGI654400049869440371002051TEA.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tasmea is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%002081ENGINERSIN1414KIEBRKN2068NCC-ABDGI65446944IMPNTEA.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tasmea is the large dot.

Tasmea competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (TEA.AX vs MND.AX vs NWH.AX vs SRG.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Tasmea TEA.AX$1.73B+49%+136%8%18.9×4.6%
Monadelphous MND.AX$1.98B-4%+29%5%22.7×5.3%
NRW NWH.AX$1.95B-17%+31%6%13.6×8.5%
SRG Global SRG.AX$1.46B+7%+27%7%22.1×16.4%

How Tasmea compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tasmea against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTEA.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.2%-0.7%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return+48.8%-9.5%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-24.4%-26.9%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+136.0%-2.0%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin7.9%6.1%8th highest of 21
Forward P/E18.9×15.0×8th most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.6%1.4%6th most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+59.3%+4.4%highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-54.7 pp-6.0 ppleast demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+12.0 pp+1.0 pp6th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA20.5×12.2×most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA0.7×0.0×5th most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Tasmea TEA.AXAustralia$1.73B+49%+136%8%18.9×4.6%+59.3%
Suzhou Gold Mantis Construction and Decoration 002081.SZChina$1.74B-25%-8%3%29.6×12.2%-11.1%
Engineers India ENGINERSIN.NSIndia$1.74B+12%+6%20%25.2×29.6%+4.6%
SHO BOND 1414.TJapan$1.71B-6%-2%23%16.3×-7.5%+2.2%
Kier KIE.LUnited Kingdom$1.75B+53%+7%3%12.7×-6.3%+5.9%
Burkhalter BRKN.SWSwitzerland$1.71B-27%-2%6%21.5×-1.3%+19.0%
Chudenko 1941.TJapan$1.71B+3%+9%12%11.0×-8.6%+4.3%
China Aluminum International Engineering 2068.HKHong Kong$1.71B-39%-6%4%13.3×11.9%-0.6%
NCC NCC-A.STSweden$1.69B-3%-17%3%22.2×-1.6%+0.7%
Envision Greenwise 1783.HKHong Kong$1.68B+38%+183%3%n/an/an/a
Guangdong Construction Engineering 002060.SZChina$1.79B-15%-11%3%8.0×n/an/a
Badger Infrastructure Solutions BDGI.TOCanada$1.80B-10%+16%8%19.2×21.0%+15.8%
China Next-Gen Commerce and Supply Chain 3928.HKHong Kong$1.81B+47%-26%-17%n/an/an/a
Japan Elevator Service 6544.TJapan$1.65B-9%+17%19%29.3×4.0%+18.6%
Shandong Hi-speed Road&bridge 000498.SZChina$1.65B+20%-9%7%4.9×n/an/a
Mega Union Technology 6944.TWTaiwan$1.82B-17%+60%21%14.1×-4.0%+30.2%
Implenia IMPN.SWSwitzerland$1.61B+12%-8%2%15.0×6.0%-2.7%
Beijing Enterprises Water 0371.HKHong Kong$1.86B-48%-5%24%9.5×4.2%-1.2%
Jinko Power Technology 601778.SSChina$1.86B-49%-25%16%n/an/an/a
MIRAIT ONE 1417.TJapan$1.60B-24%+5%6%10.4×-5.7%+5.4%
China CAMC Engineering 002051.SZChina$1.58B-15%+14%5%40.3×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Tasmea's main competitors?
Named competitors: Monadelphous Group (MND.AX), NRW Holdings (NWH.AX), SRG Global (SRG.AX). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Suzhou Gold Mantis Construction and Decoration (002081.SZ), Engineers India (ENGINERSIN.NS), SHO BOND (1414.T), Kier (KIE.L), Burkhalter (BRKN.SW), Chudenko (1941.T).
Is Tasmea expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.9× against a peer median of 15.0×, 8th most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +59%, so the hurdle is -55 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Tasmea stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +48.8% against -9.5% for the median peer; over one year +83.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.