Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ILU.AX Iluka Resources LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Iluka Resources LimitedILU.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals

World-leading miner of mineral sands (titanium dioxide feedstock, zircon) in Australia, now building a rare-earths refinery in WA.

≈ No direct US peer — closest is a mineral-sands Chemours plus a rare-earths refinerMomentum weak 23
Mkt cap
$1.77B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$9.56M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-14.2 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
109 days
23 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$5.93
1D-3.7%
1W+2.2%
1M+4.6%
3M-19.6%
6M-30.0%
YTD+2.4%
1Y-8.2%
ATR %4.4%
52w lowhigh31.8% off high

What Iluka Resources does

World-leading miner of mineral sands (titanium dioxide feedstock, zircon) in Australia, now building a rare-earths refinery in WA.

Sells zircon and titanium feedstock to tile, ceramic and pigment makers under a mix of contract and spot pricing, so revenue follows housing and construction demand. A royalty from BHP's Mining Area C iron-ore operation adds income unrelated to mineral sands. The Eneabba refinery, built with an Australian government loan, aims to make it a rare-earths processor too.

In one line: No direct US peer — closest is a mineral-sands Chemours plus a rare-earths refiner.

Products and services

  • Zircon
  • Titanium dioxide feedstock (rutile, synthetic rutile)
  • Eneabba rare-earths refinery (ramping)

Customers

  • Ceramics/tiles manufacturers (zircon)
  • TiO2 pigment producers
  • Rare-earth/magnet supply chains (future)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Mineral sands mining
  • Titanium/zircon feedstock + rare-earth…

What could go right

  • Housing/construction-linked TiO2 demand recovery
  • Rare-earths refinery commercialisation

What could go wrong

  • Mineral-sands price cyclicality
  • Refinery ramp-up execution risk

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, regulatory licence). One of few large-scale, low-impurity mineral-sands producers with a government-backed rare-earths refinery.

Headquarters: Perth, Australia · Founded: 1954 · Employees: 909

Named competitors

Iluka Resources at a glance

Size Iluka Resources (ILU.AX) is an Australia Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $1.77B, the 131st largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$5.93 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 30.0%, against -24.3% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 20.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.0%); the operating margin is -28.6% (peer median 9.9%).

Valuation It trades at 4.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.5× (8th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.2 points below its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 74ILU.AX 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Iluka Resources against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Iluka Resources financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueA$894MA$1.02BA$1.17BA$1.29BA$1.61B
Revenue growth—-13%-9%-20%—
Gross profit-A$59.3MA$82.7MA$478MA$644MA$969M
EBITDA-A$66.7MA$145MA$505MA$612MA$844M
Net income-A$404M-A$288MA$231MA$343MA$608M
Free cash flow-A$602M-A$896M-A$280M-A$161MA$485M
Capital expenditureA$819MA$862MA$434MA$281MA$153M
Total debtn/aA$1.14BA$291MA$164MA$62.5M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Iluka Resources competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-20%0%NIC600456EFR300224YCARHIMATYM300855000970DML60033860350511647610301071002182002171NEXA3858000762ILU.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Iluka Resources is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+1,000%+2,000%+3,000%0×250×500×750×NIC600456DML3858ILU.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Iluka Resources is the large dot.

Iluka Resources competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ILU.AX vs TROX vs RIO.L vs LYC.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Iluka Resources ILU.AX$1.77B-30%-20%-29%4.2×n/a
Tronox TROX$401M-72%+4%-3%1.2×n/a
Rio Tinto RIO.L$144B-21%+11%27%2.6×5.6%
Lynas Rare Earths LYC.AX$8.58B-38%+76%25%11.8×34.3%

How Iluka Resources compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Iluka Resources against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureILU.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+4.6%-8.8%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-30.0%-24.3%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-31.8%-48.2%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-20.1%+20.0%lowest of 20
Operating margin-28.6%9.9%3rd lowest of 20
EV / Sales4.2×2.5×8th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-14.2 pp-3.9 pp3rd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Iluka Resources ILU.AXAustralia$1.77B-30%-20%-29%4.2×n/an/a
Nickel Industries NIC.AXAustralia$1.78B-46%-3%10%1.8×13.1%+27.5%
Baoji Titanium Industry 600456.SSChina$1.76B-26%+14%7%2.5×n/an/a
Energy Fuels EFR.TOCanada$1.78B-70%+70%-79%14.2×n/an/a
Yantai Zhenghai Magnetic Material 300224.SZChina$1.79B-1%+16%5%1.7×20.1%+29.2%
Yellow Cake YCA.LUnited Kingdom$1.74B-12%n/an/an/an/an/a
RHI Magnesita RHIM.LUnited Kingdom$1.74B+2%-1%11%0.9×3.0%+7.5%
Atalaya Mining Copper ATYM.LUnited Kingdom$1.71B-2%+20%29%2.4×6.5%+13.0%
Jiangsu ToLand Alloy 300855.SZChina$1.83B-21%+75%28%7.1×n/an/a
Beijing Zhong Ke San Huan High-Tech 000970.SZChina$1.87B-16%+11%3%1.7×n/an/a
Denison Mines DML.TOCanada$2.00B-39%-9%-2,101%717.0×n/an/a
Tibet Summit Resources 600338.SSChina$1.56B-59%+54%30%3.2×12.8%+16.5%
China Kings Resources 603505.SSChina$1.55B-33%-11%-1%4.5×n/an/a
CGN Mining 1164.HKHong Kong$2.03B-47%+15%2%2.4×33.0%+19.1%
Lianyou Metals 7610.TWTaiwan$2.03B+89%+238%56%18.0×n/an/a
Henan Liliang Diamond 301071.SZChina$2.03B-2%+73%21%11.2×28.0%+20.9%
Baowu Magnesium Technology 002182.SZChina$1.54B-34%+4%0%1.8×n/an/a
Anhui Jingcheng Copper Share 002171.SZChina$2.07B-22%+35%1%0.3×n/an/a
Nexa Resources NEXAUnited States$1.51B-20%+27%22%0.9×-17.4%+8.9%
Jiaxin International Resources Investment 3858.HKHong Kong$2.08B-56%+2,782%65%4.2×-6.4%n/a
Tibet Mineral Development 000762.SZChina$1.50B-50%+270%20%12.6×33.1%-1.3%

Questions

Who are Iluka Resources's main competitors?
Named competitors: Tronox Holdings (TROX), Rio Tinto (mineral sands) (RIO.L), Base Resources (private or unlisted), Lynas Rare Earths (LYC.AX). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Nickel Industries (NIC.AX), Baoji Titanium Industry (600456.SS), Energy Fuels (EFR.TO), Yantai Zhenghai Magnetic Material (300224.SZ), Yellow Cake (YCA.L), RHI Magnesita (RHIM.L).
Is Iluka Resources expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 4.2× against a peer median of 2.5×, 8th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Iluka Resources stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -30.0% against -24.3% for the median peer; over one year -8.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.