Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603505.SS China Kings Resources Group Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

China Kings Resources Group Co. Ltd. Class A603505.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals

Hangzhou-based miner of fluorite and lithium mica, supplying fluorine chemicals and lithium-carbonate feedstock.

≈ A small US fluorspar miner would be the closest analogueMomentum laggard 12
Mkt cap
$1.55B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
37%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
46.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.4 pp
WACC 7.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥12.37
1D-1.2%
1W+7.4%
1M-11.0%
3M-23.8%
6M-32.5%
YTD-33.8%
1Y-31.4%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh49.3% off high

What China Kings Resources does

Hangzhou-based miner of fluorite and lithium mica, supplying fluorine chemicals and lithium-carbonate feedstock.

Sells fluorite concentrate, the raw material for fluorine chemicals, and lithium mica concentrate, which lithium-carbonate makers refine, both priced off market quotes, so sales follow fluorspar and lithium cycles. Processing fluorite one step further into hydrogen fluoride and aluminium fluoride gives it a chemical line beside the mining.

In one line: A small US fluorspar miner would be the closest analogue.

Products and services

  • Acid-grade fluorite concentrate
  • Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride
  • Lithium mica concentrate
  • Aluminum fluoride

Customers

  • Fluorochemical manufacturers
  • Aluminum smelters
  • Lithium carbonate producers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Fluorochemicals & lithium feedstock
  • Fluorite & lithium mica…

What could go right

  • Fluorochemical and refrigerant demand
  • Lithium mica as an alternative lithium feedstock

What could go wrong

  • Fluorite/lithium price volatility
  • Resource depletion risk

Moat: narrow (scale). One of China's larger fluorite reserve holders, a mineral increasingly scarce domestically.

Headquarters: Hangzhou, China · Founded: 2001 · Employees: 2,225

Named competitors

China Kings Resources at a glance

Size China Kings Resources (603505.SS) is a China Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $1.55B, the 1584th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥12.37 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.5%, against -28.2% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 11.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.9%); the operating margin is -0.7% (peer median 4.7%).

Valuation It trades at 46.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.6× (4th most expensive of 14).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.4 points below its cost of capital (7.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 71603505.SS 66
Six months, rebased to 100: China Kings Resources against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

China Kings Resources financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.26BCN¥3.88BCN¥2.75BCN¥1.89BCN¥1.04B
Revenue growth—+41%+45%+81%—
Gross profitCN¥609MCN¥655MCN¥555MCN¥634MCN¥453M
EBITDAn/aCN¥731MCN¥567MCN¥603MCN¥435M
Net incomeCN¥68.7MCN¥326MCN¥257MCN¥349MCN¥222M
Free cash flow-CN¥79.1M-CN¥324M-CN¥386M-CN¥1.01B-CN¥486M
Capital expenditureCN¥194MCN¥505MCN¥933MCN¥1.02BCN¥801M
Total debtCN¥4.53BCN¥3.93BCN¥3.05BCN¥1.90BCN¥1.04B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China Kings Resources competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-80%-60%-40%-20%0%-20%0%600338002182NEXA000762LTR000795ATYMRHIMYCA600456ILUNICEFR300224300855000970300618EMAT301357DML603505.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China Kings Resources is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×25×50×75×002182NEXALTRATYMRHIM600456NICEFR300224300855000970300618603505.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China Kings Resources is the large dot.

China Kings Resources competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (603505.SS vs 002738.SZ vs 002014.SZ vs 002460.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
China Kings Resources 603505.SS$1.55B-33%-11%-1%46.2×n/a
Sinomine Resource 002738.SZ$4.06B-59%+18%31%11.1×n/a
Huangshan Novel 002014.SZ$1.02B+5%+9%12%15.7×n/a
Ganfeng Lithium 002460.SZ$9.71B-57%+128%18%11.5×4.4%

How China Kings Resources compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China Kings Resources against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603505.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.0%-6.1%7th lowest of 21
6-month return-32.5%-28.2%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-49.3%-46.7%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-11.2%+14.9%2nd lowest of 19
Operating margin-0.7%4.7%6th lowest of 20
Forward P/E46.2×20.6×4th most expensive of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.4 pp-6.4 pp9th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China Kings Resources 603505.SSChina$1.55B-33%-11%-1%46.2×n/an/a
Tibet Summit Resources 600338.SSChina$1.56B-59%+54%30%n/a12.8%+16.5%
Baowu Magnesium Technology 002182.SZChina$1.54B-34%+4%0%74.0×n/an/a
Nexa Resources NEXAUnited States$1.51B-20%+27%22%3.0×-17.4%+8.9%
Tibet Mineral Development 000762.SZChina$1.50B-50%+270%20%n/a33.1%-1.3%
Liontown LTR.AXAustralia$1.43B-75%+115%8%18.9×38.7%+303.2%
Innuovo Technology 000795.SZChina$1.42B-8%+21%5%n/an/an/a
Atalaya Mining Copper ATYM.LUnited Kingdom$1.71B-2%+20%29%7.8×6.5%+13.0%
RHI Magnesita RHIM.LUnited Kingdom$1.74B+2%-1%11%6.9×3.0%+7.5%
Yellow Cake YCA.LUnited Kingdom$1.74B-12%n/an/a10.6×n/an/a
Baoji Titanium Industry 600456.SSChina$1.76B-26%+14%7%26.4×n/an/a
Iluka Resources ILU.AXAustralia$1.77B-30%-20%-29%n/an/an/a
Nickel Industries NIC.AXAustralia$1.78B-46%-3%10%10.4×13.1%+27.5%
Energy Fuels EFR.TOCanada$1.78B-70%+70%-79%61.7×n/an/a
Yantai Zhenghai Magnetic Material 300224.SZChina$1.79B-1%+16%5%29.9×20.1%+29.2%
Jiangsu ToLand Alloy 300855.SZChina$1.83B-21%+75%28%26.5×n/an/a
Beijing Zhong Ke San Huan High-Tech 000970.SZChina$1.87B-16%+11%3%65.8×n/an/a
Nanjing Hanrui Cobalt 300618.SZChina$1.27B-49%+11%4%20.6×n/an/a
Evolution Metals & Technologies EMATUnited States$1.23B-79%n/a-548%n/an/an/a
North Long Dragon New Materials Tech 301357.SZChina$1.23B-20%-9%-23%n/an/an/a
Denison Mines DML.TOCanada$2.00B-39%-9%-2,101%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are China Kings Resources's main competitors?
Named competitors: Sinomine Resource Group (002738.SZ), Yongxin Fluorine (002014.SZ), Ganfeng Lithium (002460.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Tibet Summit Resources (600338.SS), Baowu Magnesium Technology (002182.SZ), Nexa Resources (NEXA), Tibet Mineral Development (000762.SZ), Liontown (LTR.AX), Innuovo Technology (000795.SZ).
Is China Kings Resources expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 46.2× against a peer median of 20.6×, 4th most expensive of 14 in its peer set.
How has China Kings Resources stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.5% against -28.2% for the median peer; over one year -31.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.