Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600338.SS Tibet Summit Resources Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Tibet Summit Resources Co. Ltd. Class A600338.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals

Tibet/Central Asia-based miner producing lead, zinc and copper concentrate, with a paused lithium salt-lake project in Argentina.

≈ A small international base-metals miner, no direct US peerMomentum laggard 9
Mkt cap
$1.56B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
90%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$35.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+4.1 pp
WACC 14.9%
Hurdle
-4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · CNYCN¥11.36
1D-2.5%
1W+4.8%
1M-5.2%
3M-13.6%
6M-58.8%
YTD-24.5%
1Y-14.2%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh59.8% off high

What Tibet Summit Resources does

Tibet/Central Asia-based miner producing lead, zinc and copper concentrate, with a paused lithium salt-lake project in Argentina.

Sells lead, zinc and copper concentrates to smelters, which pay for the metal contained less processing charges, so it takes whatever the metal market pays. Its Zarafshon mine in Tajikistan is the main producing asset, while a separate lithium project in Argentina, bought as a diversification, has been paused.

In one line: A small international base-metals miner, no direct US peer.

Products and services

  • Lead concentrate
  • Zinc concentrate
  • Copper concentrate
  • Lithium carbonate (Argentina project, status uncertain)

Customers

  • Domestic and international lead/zinc smelters

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Base metals mining
  • Lead-zinc-copper concentrate production

What could go right

  • Lead/zinc price cycle
  • Potential lithium optionality if Argentina project restarts

What could go wrong

  • Cancelled/paused lithium project execution risk
  • Central Asia operating and geopolitical risk

Moat: none (scale). Owns the Zarafshon lead-zinc mine in Tajikistan but is a price-taking commodity miner.

Headquarters: Lhasa, Tibet, China · Employees: 3,086

Named competitors

Tibet Summit Resources at a glance

Size Tibet Summit Resources (600338.SS) is a China Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $1.56B, the 1580th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥11.36 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 58.8%, against -28.2% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 54.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.5%); the operating margin is 30.4% (peer median 4.6%).

Valuation It trades at 3.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.5× (9th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 13% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.1 points above its cost of capital (14.9% WACC).

Relative performance

40608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 71600338.SS 43
Six months, rebased to 100: Tibet Summit Resources against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Tibet Summit Resources financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.21BCN¥2.43BCN¥1.64BCN¥1.47BCN¥1.97B
Revenue growth—+48%+12%-26%—
Gross profitCN¥2.33BCN¥1.29BCN¥754MCN¥495MCN¥938M
EBITDAn/aCN¥855MCN¥713MCN¥469MCN¥1.06B
Net incomeCN¥645MCN¥512MCN¥230M-CN¥214MCN¥412M
Free cash flowCN¥158MCN¥59.0MCN¥301MCN¥14.0M-CN¥344M
Capital expenditureCN¥683MCN¥542MCN¥438MCN¥375MCN¥1.12B
Total debtCN¥182MCN¥413MCN¥705MCN¥320MCN¥306M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tibet Summit Resources competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-80%-60%-40%-20%0%-20%0%603505002182NEXA000762LTR000795ATYMRHIMYCA600456ILUNICEFR300224300855000970300618EMAT301357DML600338.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tibet Summit Resources is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×250×500×750×603505002182NEXA000762LTREFR300855301357DML600338.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tibet Summit Resources is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+100%+200%+300%0%100%200%300%NEXA000762LTRATYM300224600338.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tibet Summit Resources is the large dot.

Tibet Summit Resources competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (600338.SS vs 601168.SS vs 601899.SS vs 000762.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Tibet Summit Resources 600338.SS$1.56B-59%+54%30%3.2×12.8%
Western Mining 601168.SS$9.85B-7%+18%17%1.3×-5.6%
Zijin Mining 601899.SS$109B-15%+16%30%2.3×-10.2%
Tibet Mineral Development 000762.SZ$1.50B-50%+270%20%12.6×33.1%

How Tibet Summit Resources compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tibet Summit Resources against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600338.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.2%-7.4%10th highest of 21
6-month return-58.8%-28.2%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-59.8%-46.7%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+54.4%+12.5%5th highest of 19
Operating margin30.4%4.6%highest of 20
EV / Sales3.2×2.5×9th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)12.8%13.1%4th least demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+16.5%+13.0%4th highest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-3.7 pp-9.1 pp2nd most demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.1 pp-6.4 pp4th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Tibet Summit Resources 600338.SSChina$1.56B-59%+54%30%3.2×12.8%+16.5%
China Kings Resources 603505.SSChina$1.55B-33%-11%-1%4.5×n/an/a
Baowu Magnesium Technology 002182.SZChina$1.54B-34%+4%0%1.8×n/an/a
Nexa Resources NEXAUnited States$1.51B-20%+27%22%0.9×-17.4%+8.9%
Tibet Mineral Development 000762.SZChina$1.50B-50%+270%20%12.6×33.1%-1.3%
Liontown LTR.AXAustralia$1.43B-75%+115%8%3.1×38.7%+303.2%
Innuovo Technology 000795.SZChina$1.42B-8%+21%5%2.1×n/an/a
Atalaya Mining Copper ATYM.LUnited Kingdom$1.71B-2%+20%29%2.4×6.5%+13.0%
RHI Magnesita RHIM.LUnited Kingdom$1.74B+2%-1%11%0.9×3.0%+7.5%
Yellow Cake YCA.LUnited Kingdom$1.74B-12%n/an/an/an/an/a
Baoji Titanium Industry 600456.SSChina$1.76B-26%+14%7%2.5×n/an/a
Iluka Resources ILU.AXAustralia$1.77B-30%-20%-29%4.2×n/an/a
Nickel Industries NIC.AXAustralia$1.78B-46%-3%10%1.8×13.1%+27.5%
Energy Fuels EFR.TOCanada$1.78B-70%+70%-79%14.2×n/an/a
Yantai Zhenghai Magnetic Material 300224.SZChina$1.79B-1%+16%5%1.7×20.1%+29.2%
Jiangsu ToLand Alloy 300855.SZChina$1.83B-21%+75%28%7.1×n/an/a
Beijing Zhong Ke San Huan High-Tech 000970.SZChina$1.87B-16%+11%3%1.7×n/an/a
Nanjing Hanrui Cobalt 300618.SZChina$1.27B-49%+11%4%1.6×n/an/a
Evolution Metals & Technologies EMATUnited States$1.23B-79%n/a-548%356.1×n/an/a
North Long Dragon New Materials Tech 301357.SZChina$1.23B-20%-9%-23%49.9×n/an/a
Denison Mines DML.TOCanada$2.00B-39%-9%-2,101%717.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Tibet Summit Resources's main competitors?
Named competitors: Western Mining (601168.SS), Zijin Mining (601899.SS), Tibet Mineral Development (000762.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China Kings Resources (603505.SS), Baowu Magnesium Technology (002182.SZ), Nexa Resources (NEXA), Tibet Mineral Development (000762.SZ), Liontown (LTR.AX), Innuovo Technology (000795.SZ).
Is Tibet Summit Resources expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 3.2× against a peer median of 2.5×, 9th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 13% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Tibet Summit Resources stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -58.8% against -28.2% for the median peer; over one year -14.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.