Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › HMS.ST HMS Networks ABOpen in the cockpit ↗

HMS Networks ABHMS.STCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Sweden · SEK·Information Technology›Information Technology Services

Swedish maker of industrial network technology (Anybus, Ixxat) that connects factory automation equipment to networks and the cloud.

≈ A smaller, industrial-networking specialist like a mini BeldenMomentum laggard 12
Mkt cap
$2.41B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
62%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.32M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
31.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.7 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
83 days
28 Jan 2027
Close · SEKSEK 470.20
1D+2.1%
1W-3.6%
1M-16.3%
3M-2.8%
6M-16.6%
YTD+12.2%
1Y-8.6%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh20.8% off high

What HMS Networks does

Swedish maker of industrial network technology (Anybus, Ixxat) that connects factory automation equipment to networks and the cloud.

Its products are chosen by the machine maker at the design stage and are then sold across the machine's production run, so orders follow industrial machinery output. Growth has also come from acquisitions of smaller industrial-communication firms.

In one line: A smaller, industrial-networking specialist like a mini Belden.

Products and services

  • Anybus fieldbus/network gateways
  • Industrial IoT connectivity products
  • Wireless industrial communication

Customers

  • Industrial automation OEMs
  • Machine builders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Industrial automation technology
  • Industrial network connectivity…

What could go right

  • Factory automation/Industry 4.0 investment
  • IIoT connectivity adoption

What could go wrong

  • Industrial capex cyclicality
  • Semiconductor component availability

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, installed base, customer qualification). Broad protocol support and embedded design wins in automation equipment create switching costs, in a niche but competitive market.

Headquarters: Halmstad, Sweden · Founded: 1988 · Employees: 1,134

Named competitors

HMS Networks at a glance

Size HMS Networks (HMS.ST) is a Sweden Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $2.41B, the 68th largest of 221 Sweden companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at SEK 470.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 16.6%, against -10.2% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Sweden market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.5%); the operating margin is 26.9% (peer median 8.9%).

Valuation It trades at 31.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 28.0× (9th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 14% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +20%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.7 points above its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 92HMS.ST 82
Six months, rebased to 100: HMS Networks against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

HMS Networks financials

Reported figures in SEK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueSEK 3.94BSEK 3.58BSEK 3.06BSEK 3.02BSEK 2.51B
Revenue growth—+17%+1%+21%—
Gross profitSEK 2.48BSEK 2.06BSEK 1.76BSEK 1.90BSEK 1.52B
EBITDASEK 1.33BSEK 1.05BSEK 789MSEK 903MSEK 754M
Net incomeSEK 553MSEK 435MSEK 310MSEK 571MSEK 508M
Free cash flowSEK 1.07BSEK 815MSEK 553MSEK 481MSEK 398M
Capital expenditureSEK 222MSEK 133MSEK 121MSEK 73.9MSEK 83.1M
Total debtSEK 1.98BSEK 2.26BSEK 3.17BSEK 278MSEK 311M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

HMS Networks competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%OVH300002NETCTATAELXSIFSLYTIETO3002773001700221006038816810002410002929600410GLOBCNXNATEA9449KNOSCAMSHMS.ST6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. HMS Networks is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+500%+1,000%+1,500%50×100×OVH300002NETCTATAELXSIFSLYTIETO300277300170022100603881GLOBCNXNHMS.STRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. HMS Networks is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%300002TATAELXSIFSLYTIETO300277300170022100603881002410600410GLOBATEAKNOSHMS.STGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. HMS Networks is the large dot.

HMS Networks competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (HMS.ST vs BDC vs SIE.DE vs DGII)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
HMS Networks HMS.ST$2.41B-17%+15%27%31.9×14.3%
Belden BDC$3.83B-13%+18%12%10.2×10.3%
Siemens SIE.DE$225B-4%+4%13%23.4×18.3%
Digi International DGII$2.40B-4%+20%15%20.6×20.5%
Lantronix LTRXn/a-16%n/an/an/an/a

How HMS Networks compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

HMS Networks against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureHMS.STPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.3%-0.4%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-16.6%-10.2%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-20.8%-34.7%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.7%+9.5%6th highest of 21
Operating margin26.9%8.9%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E31.9×28.0×9th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)14.3%21.7%6th least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+19.5%+8.8%2nd highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.3 pp+8.8 pp3rd least demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.7 pp+4.7 pp9th highest of 18
EV / EBITDA19.1×11.7×4th most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×0.9×4th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
HMS Networks HMS.STSweden$2.41B-17%+15%27%31.9×14.3%+19.5%
OVH Groupe OVH.PAFrance$2.41B+17%+6%38%46.6×n/an/a
Beijing Ultrapower Software 300002.SZChina$2.43B-14%+9%15%20.4×4.2%+10.2%
Netcompany Group A/S NETC.CODenmark$2.44B+1%+30%11%20.4×n/an/a
Tata Elxsi TATAELXSI.NSIndia$2.52B-10%+10%20%32.7×25.3%+15.5%
Fastly FSLYUnited States$2.52B-23%+20%-12%24.4×37.8%+16.5%
Tieto TIETO.HEFinland$2.26B-5%-17%20%10.4×-6.4%-7.8%
Hangzhou Turbine Power 300277.SZChina$2.57B-37%+1,784%3%33.2×36.4%-10.7%
Hand Enterprise Solutions 300170.SZChina$2.24B-26%+7%6%48.8×27.4%+6.5%
Posco Dx 022100.KSSouth Korea$2.24B-43%-15%3%69.6×34.8%+2.2%
Shanghai AtHub 603881.SSChina$2.66B-33%-5%16%101.4×16.9%+13.6%
Shanghai Sunmi Technology 6810.HKHong Kong$2.70B-10%+10%7%n/an/an/a
Glodon 002410.SZChina$2.15B-21%-4%8%31.6×5.4%+8.8%
Runjian 002929.SZChina$2.71B+6%-11%0%49.7×n/an/a
Beijing Teamsun Technology 600410.SSChina$2.09B-42%+19%-9%n/a26.0%+3.6%
Globant GLOBUnited States$2.05B+21%-1%10%8.0×-1.2%+24.7%
PC Connection CNXNUnited States$2.00B+19%+10%4%16.6×n/an/a
Atea ATEA.OLNorway$1.99B+6%+12%4%16.4×-5.0%-1.1%
GMO Internet 9449.TJapan$1.94B-4%+6%21%13.4×n/an/a
Kainos KNOS.LUnited Kingdom$1.92B+57%+17%11%23.2×21.7%+12.9%
Computer Age Management Services CAMS.NSIndia$1.87B-15%+9%39%32.3×n/an/a

Questions

Who are HMS Networks's main competitors?
Named competitors: Belden (BDC), Siemens (SIE.DE), Moxa (private) (private or unlisted), Softing (private or unlisted), Digi International (DGII), Lantronix (LTRX). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes OVH Groupe (OVH.PA), Beijing Ultrapower Software (300002.SZ), Netcompany Group A/S (NETC.CO), Tata Elxsi (TATAELXSI.NS), Fastly (FSLY), Tieto (TIETO.HE).
Is HMS Networks expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 31.9× against a peer median of 28.0×, 9th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 14% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +20%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has HMS Networks stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -16.6% against -10.2% for the median peer; over one year -8.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.