Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 603881.SS Shanghai AtHub Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai AtHub Co., Ltd. Class A603881.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Information Technology Services

Chinese internet-data-center operator that builds and runs data centers mainly leased to cloud providers.

≈ A China-focused Digital Realty/Equinix, wholesale modelMomentum laggard 18
Mkt cap
$2.66B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
59%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$58.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
101.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.7 pp
WACC 9.6%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
129 days
15 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥20.61
1D-3.7%
1W+8.8%
1M-7.8%
3M-18.9%
6M-33.0%
YTD-18.7%
1Y-24.4%
ATR %4.7%
52w lowhigh45.2% off high

What Shanghai AtHub does

Chinese internet-data-center operator that builds and runs data centers mainly leased to cloud providers.

Leases racks and data-center space in large blocks to cloud providers on multi-year contracts, so revenue grows as new capacity comes online and tenants take it. Alibaba Cloud is its anchor tenant, which makes the business depend heavily on one customer.

In one line: A China-focused Digital Realty/Equinix, wholesale model.

Products and services

  • Wholesale IDC hosting
  • Colocation services

Customers

  • Alibaba Cloud
  • Other cloud/internet firms

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • IT infrastructure
  • Data centers (IDC)

What could go right

  • Cloud/AI compute demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration (Alibaba)
  • Power-supply/land constraints

Moat: narrow (switching costs, scale). Large anchor cloud tenant and power/location permits make data centers costly to replicate.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Employees: 654

Named competitors

Shanghai AtHub at a glance

Size Shanghai AtHub (603881.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $2.66B, the 969th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥20.61 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 33.0%, against -10.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.8%); the operating margin is 15.8% (peer median 6.1%).

Valuation It trades at 101.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 31.8× (2nd most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.7 points above its cost of capital (9.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 15 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 88603881.SS 64
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai AtHub against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai AtHub financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.69BCN¥1.72BCN¥1.72BCN¥1.54BCN¥1.45B
Revenue growth—0%+12%+6%—
Gross profitCN¥1.15BCN¥599MCN¥470MCN¥411MCN¥390M
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.19BCN¥1.13BCN¥1.07BCN¥1.02B
Net incomeCN¥140MCN¥139MCN¥132MCN¥123MCN¥118M
Free cash flowCN¥653MCN¥490MCN¥949MCN¥695MCN¥147M
Capital expenditureCN¥498MCN¥777MCN¥256MCN¥385MCN¥1.04B
Total debtCN¥2.79BCN¥3.78BCN¥3.49BCN¥3.43BCN¥3.79B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai AtHub competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%6810002929300277FSLYTATAELXSINETC300002OVHHMSTIETO300170022100688333002410600410GLOBCNXNATEA0696300339603881.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai AtHub is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+500%+1,000%+1,500%0×50×100×150×002929300277FSLYTATAELXSINETCTIETO022100688333CNXN300339603881.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai AtHub is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%300277FSLYTATAELXSI300002HMSTIETO300170022100002410600410GLOBATEA0696603881.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Shanghai AtHub is the large dot.

Shanghai AtHub competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (603881.SS vs GDS vs VNET vs 300383.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Shanghai AtHub 603881.SS$2.66B-33%-5%16%101.4×16.9%
GDS Holdings Ltd. Sponsored ADR GDS$4.46B-49%+12%17%n/an/a
VNET Group, Inc. Sponsored ADR VNET$1.00B-64%+23%7%89.6×n/a
Beijing Sinnet Technology 300383.SZ$2.70B-37%-2%-11%149.7×46.5%

How Shanghai AtHub compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai AtHub against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure603881.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.8%-0.8%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-33.0%-10.5%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.2%-36.1%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.8%+9.8%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin15.8%6.1%6th highest of 21
Forward P/E101.4×31.8×2nd most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)16.9%14.3%7th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+13.6%+8.8%5th highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.3 pp+1.5 pp7th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.7 pp+3.3 pp9th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shanghai AtHub 603881.SSChina$2.66B-33%-5%16%101.4×16.9%+13.6%
Shanghai Sunmi Technology 6810.HKHong Kong$2.70B-10%+10%7%n/an/an/a
Runjian 002929.SZChina$2.71B+6%-11%0%49.7×n/an/a
Hangzhou Turbine Power 300277.SZChina$2.57B-37%+1,784%3%33.2×36.4%-10.7%
Fastly FSLYUnited States$2.52B-23%+20%-12%24.4×37.8%+16.5%
Tata Elxsi TATAELXSI.NSIndia$2.52B-10%+10%20%32.7×25.3%+15.5%
Netcompany Group A/S NETC.CODenmark$2.44B+1%+30%11%20.4×n/an/a
Beijing Ultrapower Software 300002.SZChina$2.43B-14%+9%15%20.4×4.2%+10.2%
OVH Groupe OVH.PAFrance$2.41B+17%+6%38%46.6×n/an/a
HMS Networks HMS.STSweden$2.41B-17%+15%27%31.9×14.3%+19.5%
Tieto TIETO.HEFinland$2.26B-5%-17%20%10.4×-6.4%-7.8%
Hand Enterprise Solutions 300170.SZChina$2.24B-26%+7%6%48.8×27.4%+6.5%
Posco Dx 022100.KSSouth Korea$2.24B-43%-15%3%69.6×34.8%+2.2%
Xi'an Bright Laser Technologies 688333.SSChina$3.22B-11%+12%6%69.2×n/an/a
Glodon 002410.SZChina$2.15B-21%-4%8%31.6×5.4%+8.8%
Beijing Teamsun Technology 600410.SSChina$2.09B-42%+19%-9%n/a26.0%+3.6%
Globant GLOBUnited States$2.05B+21%-1%10%8.0×-1.2%+24.7%
PC Connection CNXNUnited States$2.00B+19%+10%4%16.6×n/an/a
Atea ATEA.OLNorway$1.99B+6%+12%4%16.4×-5.0%-1.1%
TravelSky Technology 0696.HKHong Kong$3.59B-5%+7%28%9.8×-16.5%+9.0%
Jiangsu Hoperun Software 300339.SZChina$3.65B-31%+11%3%141.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Shanghai AtHub's main competitors?
Named competitors: GDS Holdings (GDS), VNET Group (VNET), Beijing Sinnet Technology (300383.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shanghai Sunmi Technology (6810.HK), Runjian (002929.SZ), Hangzhou Turbine Power (300277.SZ), Fastly (FSLY), Tata Elxsi (TATAELXSI.NS), Netcompany Group A/S (NETC.CO).
Is Shanghai AtHub expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 101.4× against a peer median of 31.8×, 2nd most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Shanghai AtHub stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -33.0% against -10.5% for the median peer; over one year -24.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.