Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › GFTU.L Grafton Group PlcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Grafton Group PlcGFTU.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Consumer Discretionary›Wholesale Distributors

Irish/UK builders' merchant group distributing building materials and DIY products across the UK, Ireland and Netherlands.

≈ A UK/Irish Builders FirstSource peerMomentum strong 74
Mkt cap
$2.59B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
88%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.50M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.8 pp
WACC 11.2%
Hurdle
+0 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
125 days
11 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£1,034
1D-1.5%
1W+4.5%
1M+12.2%
3M+0.2%
6M+25.1%
YTD+10.5%
1Y+11.2%
ATR %2.6%
52w lowhigh3.3% off high

What Grafton does

Irish/UK builders' merchant group distributing building materials and DIY products across the UK, Ireland and Netherlands.

Earns the markup between what manufacturers charge and what builders and tradespeople pay at its local branches, often on account terms, so credit control and local relationships matter. Repair, maintenance and improvement work keeps sales steadier than new building. The UK and Ireland carry the business, with a smaller Dutch arm.

In one line: A UK/Irish Builders FirstSource peer.

Products and services

  • Builders merchanting (UK, Ireland)
  • DIY retail (Woodie's - Ireland)
  • Manufacturing (building products)

Customers

  • Construction contractors/tradespeople
  • DIY/home improvement consumers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Discretionary
  • Builders merchant distribution
  • Building materials distribution, DIY…

What could go right

  • UK/Irish construction & repair-maintenance-improvement demand

What could go wrong

  • Construction/housing market cyclicality
  • Input cost inflation

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, installed base). Extensive branch network across UK/Ireland gives scale and local trade-relationship advantages.

Headquarters: Dublin, Ireland · Founded: 1902 · Employees: 10,001

Named competitors

Grafton at a glance

Size Grafton (GFTU.L) is a United Kingdom Consumer Discretionary company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $2.59B, the 143rd largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £1,034 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 25.1%, against -12.4% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 10 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +17.3%); the operating margin is 6.4% (peer median 11.7%).

Valuation It trades at 13.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.5× (3rd cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +0 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.8 points below its cost of capital (11.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026GFTU.L 126Peer median 85
Six months, rebased to 100: Grafton against the median of its 9 peers (local-currency closes).

Grafton financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£2.60B£2.52B£2.28B£2.32B£2.30B
Revenue growth—+10%-2%+1%—
Gross profit£167M£384M£345M£374M£417M
EBITDA£325M£313M£289M£310M£356M
Net income£130M£137M£122M£149M£209M
Free cash flow£220M£232M£231M£248M£171M
Capital expenditure£49.8M£46.2M£46.8M£52.8M£57.8M
Total debtn/a£619M£641M£633M£703M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Grafton competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%+40%GCTCRCTAEGISLOGGMDCLTDLLOYDSENTPOOLMMTCAPCSHARDACROPGFTU.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Grafton is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%10×20×30×GCTCRCTAEGISLOGGMDCLTDPOOLAPCSHARDACROPGFTU.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Grafton is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%GCTCRCTAEGISLOGPOOLAPCSHARDACROPGFTU.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Grafton is the large dot.

Grafton competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (GFTU.L vs TPK.L vs FERG vs WIX.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Grafton GFTU.L$2.59B+25%+9%6%13.6×8.8%
Travis Perkins TPK.L$1.86B+28%0%3%23.2×8.5%
Ferguson Enterprises FERG$45.2B-3%+8%10%19.4×9.9%
Wickes WIX.L$717M+36%+4%4%13.3×2.2%
Kingfisher KGF.L$8.17B+34%+1%5%13.9×5.7%
Howden Joinery HWDN.L$6.12B+16%+4%15%16.6×14.9%
SIG SIGN.SW$7.07B+23%-5%5%20.5×18.4%

How Grafton compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Grafton against its 9 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureGFTU.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+12.2%-5.1%3rd highest of 10
6-month return+25.1%-12.4%4th highest of 10
Distance from 52-week high-3.3%-27.8%highest of 10
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.6%+17.3%5th lowest of 10
Operating margin6.4%11.7%3rd lowest of 10
Forward P/E13.6×17.5×3rd cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.8%5.4%2nd most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.5%+11.4%4th highest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+0.3 pp-2.4 pp3rd most demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.8 pp+0.2 pp4th lowest of 10
EV / EBITDA6.9×14.2×2nd cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA1.0×-0.5×3rd most indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Grafton GFTU.LUnited Kingdom$2.59B+25%+9%6%13.6×8.8%+8.5%
GigaCloud Technology GCTUnited States$2.08B+45%+23%12%11.1×8.0%+36.2%
Cricut CRCTUnited States$1.84B+104%-1%17%31.3×-10.4%-5.9%
Aegis Logistics AEGISLOG.NSIndia$4.23B+54%+20%21%27.3×26.9%+16.7%
Gujarat Mineral Development GMDCLTD.NSIndia$1.56B-34%+19%15%16.0×n/an/a
Lloyds Enterprises LLOYDSENT.NSIndia$988M-12%+33%8%n/an/an/a
Pool POOLUnited States$7.56B+13%+3%11%18.6×5.9%+6.1%
MMTC MMTC.NSIndia$847M-20%-20%-6,724%n/an/an/a
ARKO Petroleum APCUnited States$704M-23%-12%2%17.5×4.8%-7.6%
Sharda Cropchem SHARDACROP.NSIndia$655M-39%+17%14%9.3×-2.6%+17.1%

Questions

Who are Grafton's main competitors?
Named competitors: Travis Perkins (TPK.L), Ferguson (Wolseley) (FERG), Wickes Group (WIX.L), Kingfisher (KGF.L), Howden Joinery (HWDN.L), SIG (SIGN.SW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes GigaCloud Technology (GCT), Cricut (CRCT), Aegis Logistics (AEGISLOG.NS), Gujarat Mineral Development (GMDCLTD.NS), Lloyds Enterprises (LLOYDSENT.NS), Pool (POOL).
Is Grafton expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.6× against a peer median of 17.5×, 3rd cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +0 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Grafton stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +25.1% against -12.4% for the median peer; over one year +11.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.