Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › POOL Pool CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Pool CorporationPOOLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Wholesale Distributors

Wholesale distributor of swimming pool supplies, equipment and related outdoor living products to pool builders and retailers.

Momentum leader 86
Mkt cap
$7.56B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$168M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.4 pp
WACC 8.8%
Hurdle
-0 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$211.70
1D-2.3%
1W+2.8%
1M+33.9%
3M+5.9%
6M+12.7%
YTD-7.5%
1Y-16.3%
ATR %3.6%
Beta0.53
52w lowhigh23.9% off high

What Pool does

Wholesale distributor of swimming pool supplies, equipment and related outdoor living products to pool builders and retailers.

Buys from equipment and chemical makers and resells through local service centres to contractors and retailers, earning a distributor's margin, with stock on hand and fast delivery as the selling point. Most sales come from maintaining and replacing equipment in existing pools, steadier than new construction. A smaller irrigation and landscape supply line, Horizon, runs alongside.

Products and services

  • Pool equipment/supplies distribution
  • Pool construction materials
  • Retail (SCP/Superior Pool Products stores)

Customers

  • Pool builders/contractors
  • Pool retailers
  • Service/repair companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Distribution
  • Pool supplies

What could go right

  • New pool construction/renovation demand
  • Aftermarket maintenance/repair growth

What could go wrong

  • Housing/discretionary spending cyclicality
  • Weather-dependent seasonal demand

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, installed base). The largest wholesale distributor in a fragmented industry, with branch coverage builders rely on.

Headquarters: Covington, Louisiana, USA · Founded: 1993 · Employees: 6,000

Named competitors

  • Leslie's, Inc. private or unlisted
  • Fluidra FDR.MC

Pool at a glance

Size Pool (POOL) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $7.56B, the 922nd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $211.70 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 12.7%, against +18.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 14 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +18.6%); the operating margin is 10.5% (peer median 8.2%).

Valuation It trades at 18.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.0× (4th most expensive of 10).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -0 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.4 points above its cost of capital (8.8% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 9.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 122POOL 115
Six months, rebased to 100: Pool against the median of its 13 peers (local-currency closes).

Pool financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$5.45B$5.29B$5.31B$5.54B$6.18B
Revenue growth—0%-4%-10%—
Gross profit$1.60B$1.57B$1.58B$1.66B$1.93B
EBITDA$630M$632M$663M$787M$1.07B
Net income$394M$404M$432M$520M$744M
Free cash flow$442M$310M$600M$828M$441M
Capital expenditure$58.0M$56.3M$59.5M$60.1M$43.6M
Total debt$1.52B$1.54B$1.27B$1.36B$1.66B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Pool competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%+40%AEGISLOGGPCGFTUGCTCRCTGMDCLTDADANIENTLLOYDSENTMMTCAPCSHARDACROPMARINESBCPOOL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Pool is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×AEGISLOGGPCGFTUGCTCRCTGMDCLTDADANIENTAPCSHARDACROPPOOLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Pool is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%AEGISLOGGPCGFTUGCTCRCTAPCSHARDACROPPOOLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Pool is the large dot.

Pool competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (POOL vs FDR.MC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Pool POOL$7.56B+13%+3%11%18.6×5.9%
Fluidra FDR.MC$4.12B+4%+2%14%14.9×5.4%

How Pool compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Pool against its 13 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePOOLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+33.9%-4.2%2nd highest of 14
6-month return+12.7%+18.5%7th lowest of 14
Distance from 52-week high-23.9%-20.3%7th lowest of 14
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.9%+18.6%4th lowest of 14
Operating margin10.5%8.2%6th highest of 14
Forward P/E18.6×16.0×4th most expensive of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.9%7.5%4th least demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.1%+8.5%3rd lowest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-0.2 pp-0.5 pp4th most demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.4 pp-1.1 pp4th highest of 14
EV / EBITDA14.2×20.2×6th cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA2.2×0.1×5th most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Pool POOLUnited States$7.56B+13%+3%11%18.6×5.9%+6.1%
Aegis Logistics AEGISLOG.NSIndia$4.23B+54%+20%21%27.3×26.9%+16.7%
Genuine Parts GPCUnited States$16.9B+19%+5%5%15.5×7.5%+8.0%
Grafton GFTU.LUnited Kingdom$2.59B+25%+9%6%13.6×8.8%+8.5%
GigaCloud Technology GCTUnited States$2.08B+45%+23%12%11.1×8.0%+36.2%
Cricut CRCTUnited States$1.84B+104%-1%17%31.3×-10.4%-5.9%
Gujarat Mineral Development GMDCLTD.NSIndia$1.56B-34%+19%15%16.0×n/an/a
Adani Enterprises ADANIENT.NSIndia$39.3B+9%+37%8%50.6×n/an/a
Lloyds Enterprises LLOYDSENT.NSIndia$988M-12%+33%8%n/an/an/a
MMTC MMTC.NSIndia$847M-20%-20%-6,724%n/an/an/a
ARKO Petroleum APCUnited States$704M-23%-12%2%17.5×4.8%-7.6%
Sharda Cropchem SHARDACROP.NSIndia$655M-39%+17%14%9.3×-2.6%+17.1%
Marine Electricals (India) MARINE.NSIndia$571M+66%+22%9%n/an/an/a
SBC Exports SBC.NSIndia$346M+102%+63%8%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Pool's main competitors?
Named competitors: Leslie's, Inc. (private or unlisted), Fluidra (FDR.MC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Aegis Logistics (AEGISLOG.NS), Genuine Parts (GPC), Grafton (GFTU.L), GigaCloud Technology (GCT), Cricut (CRCT), Gujarat Mineral Development (GMDCLTD.NS).
Is Pool expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.6× against a peer median of 16.0×, 4th most expensive of 10 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -0 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Pool stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +12.7% against +18.5% for the median peer; over one year -16.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.