Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › AEGISLOG.NS Aegis LogisticsOpen in the cockpit ↗

Aegis LogisticsAEGISLOG.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Consumer & Retail›Wholesale Distributors

Indian energy-logistics company operating LPG import/distribution and liquid & chemical storage terminals at major ports.

≈ India's Vopak for liquids and LPGMomentum strong 67
Mkt cap
$4.23B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
36%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$23.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
27.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.2 pp
WACC 14.6%
Hurdle
+10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
84 days
29 Jan 2027
Close · INR₹1,141
1D-3.8%
1W+4.0%
1M-21.9%
3M-18.5%
6M+54.3%
YTD+59.0%
1Y+48.2%
ATR %7.5%
Beta1.01
52w lowhigh25.4% off high

What Aegis Logistics does

Indian energy-logistics company operating LPG import/distribution and liquid & chemical storage terminals at major ports.

Earns a margin for bringing in LPG by ship, storing it at port terminals and selling it on to bottlers, industrial buyers and fuel retailers, plus fees for storing liquids and chemicals for others. Terminals are held in a joint venture with Dutch tank-storage group Vopak. Storage fees are steadier than the trading margin on LPG.

In one line: India's Vopak for liquids and LPG.

Products and services

  • LPG sourcing, storage & distribution
  • Liquid/chemical storage terminals
  • Aegis Vopak Terminals JV

Customers

  • Oil marketing companies
  • LPG bottlers/distributors
  • Chemical/petroleum shippers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy logistics
  • Terminal storage (liquids & LPG)
  • Import, storage, distribution

What could go right

  • Rising India LPG/liquid fuel import volumes
  • Terminal capacity expansion

What could go wrong

  • LPG subsidy/pricing policy changes
  • Commodity throughput volume cyclicality

Moat: narrow (installed base, regulatory licence, scale). Owns scarce port-side terminal capacity and import infrastructure that is slow and costly to replicate.

Headquarters: Mumbai, India · Founded: 1956 · Employees: 413

Named competitors

Aegis Logistics at a glance

Size Aegis Logistics (AEGISLOG.NS) is an India Consumer Discretionary company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $4.23B, the 232nd largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹1,141 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 54.3%, against +25.1% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 6 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 19.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.6%); the operating margin is 20.9% (peer median 11.7%).

Valuation It trades at 27.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.0× (2nd most expensive of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 27% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +17%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.2 points below its cost of capital (14.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026AEGISLOG.NS 158Peer median 126
Six months, rebased to 100: Aegis Logistics against the median of its 5 peers (local-currency closes).

Aegis Logistics financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹88.9B₹83.2B₹67.6B₹70.4B₹86.2B
Revenue growth—+23%-4%-18%—
Gross profit₹22.1B₹14.9B₹10.8B₹9.18B₹7.25B
EBITDA₹20.7B₹14.9B₹11.1B₹9.30B₹7.44B
Net income₹13.3B₹8.98B₹6.63B₹5.69B₹4.63B
Free cash flown/a₹13.3B-₹3.70B₹584M-₹1.85B
Capital expendituren/a₹8.21B₹9.45B₹6.16B₹5.38B
Total debt₹48.0B₹41.5B₹46.1B₹26.7B₹19.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Aegis Logistics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%+40%GFTUPOOLGCTCRCTGMDCLTDAEGISLOG.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Aegis Logistics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%10×20×30×GFTUPOOLGCTCRCTGMDCLTDAEGISLOG.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Aegis Logistics is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%GFTUPOOLGCTCRCTAEGISLOG.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Aegis Logistics is the large dot.

Aegis Logistics competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (AEGISLOG.NS vs IOC.NS vs HINDPETRO.NS vs VPK.AS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Aegis Logistics AEGISLOG.NS$4.23B+54%+20%21%27.3×26.9%
Indian Oil IOC.NS$21.9B0%+23%7%20.8×-2.3%
Hindustan Petroleum HINDPETRO.NS$8.67B-2%+17%0%n/a24.7%
Royal Vopak VPK.AS$6.51B+14%+1%29%15.5×8.8%
Adani Total Gas ATGL.NS$6.69B-11%+24%14%27.9×n/a

How Aegis Logistics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Aegis Logistics against its 5 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAEGISLOG.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-21.9%+12.2%lowest of 6
6-month return+54.3%+25.1%2nd highest of 6
Distance from 52-week high-25.4%-13.1%2nd lowest of 6
Revenue growth (TTM)+19.7%+8.6%2nd highest of 6
Operating margin20.9%11.7%highest of 6
Forward P/E27.3×16.0×2nd most expensive of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)26.9%6.9%most demanding of 5
Growth delivered (Del g)+16.7%+7.3%2nd highest of 5
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+10.2 pp-2.4 ppmost demanding of 5
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.2 pp+8.4 pp3rd lowest of 6
EV / EBITDA20.2×12.3×2nd most expensive of 6
Net debt / EBITDA-0.5×0.7×3rd least indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Aegis Logistics AEGISLOG.NSIndia$4.23B+54%+20%21%27.3×26.9%+16.7%
Grafton GFTU.LUnited Kingdom$2.59B+25%+9%6%13.6×8.8%+8.5%
Pool POOLUnited States$7.56B+13%+3%11%18.6×5.9%+6.1%
GigaCloud Technology GCTUnited States$2.08B+45%+23%12%11.1×8.0%+36.2%
Cricut CRCTUnited States$1.84B+104%-1%17%31.3×-10.4%-5.9%
Gujarat Mineral Development GMDCLTD.NSIndia$1.56B-34%+19%15%16.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Aegis Logistics's main competitors?
Named competitors: Indian Oil Corporation (IOC.NS), Hindustan Petroleum (HINDPETRO.NS), Royal Vopak (VPK.AS), Adani Total Gas (ATGL.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Grafton (GFTU.L), Pool (POOL), GigaCloud Technology (GCT), Cricut (CRCT), Gujarat Mineral Development (GMDCLTD.NS).
Is Aegis Logistics expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 27.3× against a peer median of 16.0×, 2nd most expensive of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 27% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +17%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Aegis Logistics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +54.3% against +25.1% for the median peer; over one year +48.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.