Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › KGF.L Kingfisher PlcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Kingfisher PlcKGF.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Consumer Discretionary›Home Improvement Chains

UK/European home-improvement retailer operating B&Q and Screwfix stores selling DIY, building and trade products.

≈ The UK's Home Depot/Lowe's equivalentMomentum leader 92
Mkt cap
$8.17B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$26.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.7 pp
WACC 11.0%
Hurdle
+5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
137 days
23 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£374.50
1D-1.3%
1W+6.5%
1M+16.2%
3M+16.9%
6M+34.3%
YTD+19.8%
1Y+20.8%
ATR %3.4%
52w lowhigh3.9% off high

What Kingfisher does

UK/European home-improvement retailer operating B&Q and Screwfix stores selling DIY, building and trade products.

Runs its own big-box stores and trade counters, keeping the full retail margin, with a growing share from own-brand products it designs and sources directly rather than buying branded goods. The UK and France are the largest markets, and tradespeople, who buy far more often than homeowners, are the core of Screwfix.

In one line: The UK's Home Depot/Lowe's equivalent.

Products and services

  • B&Q (DIY retail)
  • Screwfix (trade retail)
  • Castorama/Brico Depot (France, Poland)

Customers

  • DIY homeowners
  • Small trade contractors across UK, France, Poland

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Home improvement retail
  • DIY & trade stores

What could go right

  • Home-improvement/renovation spending
  • Screwfix international rollout

What could go wrong

  • Housing-market slowdown reducing DIY spend
  • French/Polish market weakness

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, brand). Screwfix's fast trade-focused fulfilment and B&Q/Castorama scale give purchasing and logistics advantages.

Headquarters: London, UK · Founded: 1982 · Employees: 69,720

Named competitors

Kingfisher at a glance

Size Kingfisher (KGF.L) is a United Kingdom Consumer Discretionary company (Home Improvement Chains) with a market value of $8.17B, the 59th largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £374.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 34.3%, against +10.4% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 16 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.7%); the operating margin is 5.1% (peer median 6.3%).

Valuation It trades at 13.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.7× (7th most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.7 points below its cost of capital (11.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026KGF.L 133Peer median 111
Six months, rebased to 100: Kingfisher against the median of its 15 peers (local-currency closes).

Kingfisher financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2026-01-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£13.0B£12.9B£12.8B£13.0B£13.1B
Revenue growth—+1%-2%-1%—
Gross profit£5.00B£4.80B£4.64B£4.67B£4.71B
EBITDA£1.34B£1.30B£1.28B£1.29B£1.42B
Net income£298M£245M£185M£345M£471M
Free cash flow£967M£1.14B£996M£964M£368M
Capital expenditure£421M£401M£322M£367M£456M
Total debtn/a£2.34B£2.32B£2.48B£2.56B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kingfisher competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%0%+10%+20%FNDCLAS-BHBH3050821881303191LOWBMAXVIC2790HDKGF.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kingfisher is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+2%+4%+6%+8%+10%10×20×30×FNDCLAS-BHBH305082188130WES75169842LOWBMAXVICHDKGF.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kingfisher is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%-10%0%10%20%FNDCLAS-BHBH305082188130WES75169842LOWBMAXVICHDKGF.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kingfisher is the large dot.

Kingfisher competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (KGF.L vs HD vs LOW vs WIX.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kingfisher KGF.L$8.17B+34%+1%5%13.9×5.7%
Home Depot (The) HD$343B+9%+2%12%22.4×9.0%
Lowe's LOW$126B-2%+8%11%18.0×2.7%
Wickes WIX.L$717M+36%+4%4%13.3×2.2%
Travis Perkins TPK.L$1.86B+28%0%3%23.2×8.5%

How Kingfisher compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kingfisher against its 15 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKGF.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+16.2%+7.0%5th highest of 16
6-month return+34.3%+10.4%2nd highest of 16
Distance from 52-week high-3.9%-7.5%4th highest of 16
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.2%+4.7%2nd lowest of 16
Operating margin5.1%6.3%5th lowest of 16
Forward P/E13.9×13.7×7th most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.7%1.6%6th most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.0%+3.9%5th lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+4.8 pp-0.5 pp2nd most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.7 pp+0.2 pp3rd lowest of 16
EV / EBITDA6.0×9.4×4th cheapest of 15
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×2.0×7th least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kingfisher KGF.LUnited Kingdom$8.17B+34%+1%5%13.9×5.7%+1.0%
Floor & Decor FNDUnited States$5.34B-1%+2%6%27.3×17.7%+14.1%
Clas Ohlson CLAS-B.STSweden$3.49B+33%+10%13%23.7×6.8%+8.6%
HORNBACH Holding AG & Co. KGaA HBH.DEGermany$1.66B+18%+5%4%10.2×-3.6%+3.4%
DCM 3050.TJapan$1.40B+10%+5%6%12.5×-1.7%+2.9%
Komeri 8218.TJapan$1.21B+17%+3%6%11.8×-6.8%0.0%
Sangetsu 8130.TJapan$1.15B+4%+4%10%13.7×-10.8%+7.3%
Wesfarmers WES.AXAustralia$64.0B+14%+3%9%30.5×20.6%+6.9%
Kohnan Shoji 7516.TJapan$925M+15%+6%5%10.1×0.4%+3.3%
Joyful Honda 3191.TJapan$859M+10%+5%6%n/a1.1%+0.3%
Arclands 9842.TJapan$748M+6%+8%4%9.4×2.2%+14.2%
Lowe's LOWUnited States$126B-2%+8%11%18.0×2.7%-0.8%
Byggmax BMAX.STSweden$393M+42%+2%6%13.7×-0.4%-2.0%
Victorian Plumbing VIC.LUnited Kingdom$386M+15%+7%6%16.9×11.0%+8.2%
NAFCO 2790.TJapan$346M-12%-3%1%n/an/an/a
Home Depot (The) HDUnited States$343B+9%+2%12%22.4×9.0%+4.5%

Questions

Who are Kingfisher's main competitors?
Named competitors: Home Depot (HD), Lowe's (LOW), Wickes Group (WIX.L), Travis Perkins (TPK.L), Leroy Merlin (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Floor & Decor (FND), Clas Ohlson (CLAS-B.ST), HORNBACH Holding AG & Co. KGaA (HBH.DE), DCM (3050.T), Komeri (8218.T), Sangetsu (8130.T).
Is Kingfisher expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.9× against a peer median of 13.7×, 7th most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Kingfisher stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +34.3% against +10.4% for the median peer; over one year +20.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.