Loading…

A. O. SmithAOSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Building Products

Makes residential and commercial water heaters, boilers and water treatment products sold through wholesale and retail channels.

Momentum strong 75
Mkt cap
$8.67B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$114M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+13.9 pp
WACC 9.6%
Hurdle
-1 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
88 days
2 Feb 2027
Close · USD$64.55
1D-3.0%
1W+2.4%
1M+14.1%
3M+3.4%
6M+10.2%
YTD-2.5%
1Y-1.2%
ATR %3.1%
Beta0.71
52w lowhigh20.7% off high

What A. O. Smith does

Makes residential and commercial water heaters, boilers and water treatment products sold through wholesale and retail channels.

Most water heaters are bought when an old one fails, so replacement demand is steady and plumbers choose the brand, with new construction a smaller and more cyclical part. Water treatment in China and India is mostly sold to households through stores and online.

Products and services

  • Residential water heaters
  • Commercial water heaters/boilers
  • Water treatment (filtration) products

Customers

  • Plumbing wholesalers/contractors
  • Home Depot/Lowe's (retail)
  • China/India water treatment consumers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Building products
  • Water heating and treatment equipment…

What could go right

  • North American replacement-driven demand (non-discretionary)
  • Heat pump water heater adoption from efficiency rules

What could go wrong

  • China water treatment market softness
  • New construction/remodeling cyclicality

Moat: wide (brand, distribution, installed base). The dominant North American water heater brand with deep plumbing-wholesale distribution and replacement-driven demand.

Headquarters: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US · Founded: 1874 · Employees: 11,500

Named competitors

A. O. Smith at a glance

Size A. O. Smith (AOS) is a United States Industrials company (Building Products) with a market value of $8.67B, the 848th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $64.55 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 10.2%, against -1.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.5%); the operating margin is 18.1% (peer median 13.2%).

Valuation It trades at 17.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.1× (9th most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.9 points above its cost of capital (9.6% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 10.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026AOS 110Peer median 96
Six months, rebased to 100: A. O. Smith against the median of its 17 peers (local-currency closes).

A. O. Smith financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.80B$3.83B$3.82B$3.85B$3.75B
Revenue growth—0%-1%+3%—
Gross profit$1.47B$1.49B$1.45B$1.48B$1.33B
EBITDA$782M$812M$793M$826M$732M
Net income$495M$546M$534M$557M$236M
Free cash flow$562M$546M$474M$598M$321M
Capital expenditure$50.8M$70.8M$108M$72.6M$70.3M
Total debt$715M$203M$228M$167M$377M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

A. O. Smith competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%SSDSPXCWSOFBIN5332000958CSL5929MASGFF53930024685947600835RWC002545KNEBVAOS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. A. O. Smith is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%10×20×SSDSPXCWSOFBIN5332000958CSL5929GFF53930024685947600835002545KNEBVAOSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. A. O. Smith is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%-10%0%10%20%SSDSPXCWSOFBIN5332CSL5929MAS0024685947600835RWC002545AOSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. A. O. Smith is the large dot.

A. O. Smith competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (AOS vs 5947.T vs ARIS.MI vs PNR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
A. O. Smith AOS$8.67B+10%-1%18%17.3×4.5%
Rinnai 5947.T$3.07B-3%+4%10%13.3×-9.5%
Ariston ARIS.MI$1.20B-17%+5%6%8.8×0.1%
Pentair PNR$10.9B-11%-4%22%13.2×7.1%

How A. O. Smith compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

A. O. Smith against its 17 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAOSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+14.1%+2.9%5th highest of 18
6-month return+10.2%-1.2%6th highest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-20.7%-22.4%9th highest of 18
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.7%+2.5%5th lowest of 18
Operating margin18.1%13.2%5th highest of 17
Forward P/E17.3×17.1×9th most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.5%5.5%7th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.8%+5.8%9th highest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-1.3 pp+2.2 pp5th least demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+13.9 pp+6.5 pp6th highest of 17
EV / EBITDA11.7×11.9×7th cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA0.6×-0.1×7th most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
A. O. Smith AOSUnited States$8.67B+10%-1%18%17.3×4.5%+5.8%
Simpson Manufacturing SSDUnited States$8.07B+4%+5%20%20.9×13.2%+13.0%
SPX Technologies SPXCUnited States$7.15B-30%+20%17%15.3×15.7%+15.0%
Watsco WSOUnited States$12.7B-28%0%9%24.3×13.2%+7.4%
Fortune Brands Innovations FBINUnited States$5.74B+27%-3%14%19.7×5.3%-6.0%
Toto 5332.TJapan$5.40B-1%+5%8%18.2×7.8%+5.0%
SPIC Industry-Finance 000958.SZChina$14.0B-14%+102%n/a22.2×n/an/a
Carlisle Companies CSLUnited States$14.5B+4%+4%20%15.9×3.7%+4.8%
Sanwa 5929.TJapan$5.10B+8%+2%11%14.8×-2.6%+9.1%
Masco MASUnited States$15.8B+15%+1%18%18.0×4.9%+1.0%
Griffon GFFUnited States$4.58B+15%-12%20%17.1×7.5%+4.0%
Nichias 5393.TJapan$3.52B-5%+3%15%15.2×7.1%+5.1%
STO Express 002468.SZChina$3.40B-8%+26%5%10.2×-12.5%+20.8%
Rinnai 5947.TJapan$3.07B-3%+4%10%13.3×-9.5%+6.4%
Shanghai Mechanical & Electrical Industry 600835.SSChina$2.34B-27%-2%2%22.5×0.6%-3.8%
Reliance Worldwide RWC.AXAustralia$2.33B+47%-5%12%16.3×9.9%+7.5%
Qingdao East Steel Tower Stock 002545.SZChina$2.25B-50%+23%32%8.5×-10.2%+13.0%
KONE KNEBV.HEFinland$33.8B+15%+2%12%27.1×5.8%+2.5%

Questions

Who are A. O. Smith's main competitors?
Named competitors: Rheem Manufacturing (private or unlisted), Bradford White (private or unlisted), Rinnai (5947.T), Ariston Holding (ARIS.MI), Pentair (PNR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Simpson Manufacturing (SSD), SPX Technologies (SPXC), Watsco (WSO), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), Toto (5332.T), SPIC Industry-Finance (000958.SZ).
Is A. O. Smith expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.3× against a peer median of 17.1×, 9th most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has A. O. Smith stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +10.2% against -1.2% for the median peer; over one year -1.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.