Loading…

Acerinox SAACX.MCCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Spain · EUR·Materials›Steel

Spanish stainless steel producer making flat and long products, with major operations in Spain, US and South Africa.

≈ A global stainless-steel maker like a smaller Outokumpu/Allegheny TechnologiesMomentum laggard 18
Mkt cap
$4.00B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
71%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$13.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.1 pp
WACC 8.5%
Hurdle
+14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
112 days
26 Feb 2027
Close · EUR€14.94
1D-3.5%
1W-7.0%
1M-9.6%
3M-18.3%
6M+1.6%
YTD+18.0%
1Y+32.7%
ATR %3.5%
52w lowhigh19.6% off high

What Acerinox does

Spanish stainless steel producer making flat and long products, with major operations in Spain, US and South Africa.

Sells stainless steel with a surcharge that follows the nickel price, so metal prices and the timing of inventory purchases move results as much as volumes do. Its large US mill, North American Stainless, and VDM Metals, a maker of high-value nickel alloys for aerospace and energy, widen it beyond Spain.

In one line: A global stainless-steel maker like a smaller Outokumpu/Allegheny Technologies.

Products and services

  • Flat stainless steel products
  • Long stainless steel products
  • Ferronickel/raw material processing

Customers

  • Industrial fabricators
  • Appliance/automotive manufacturers
  • Construction

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Steel
  • Stainless steel manufacturing

What could go right

  • Global industrial demand cycle
  • Nickel/raw-material cost pass-through

What could go wrong

  • Steel price cyclicality
  • Chinese overcapacity/import competition

Moat: narrow (scale, cost advantage). Vertical integration (own ferronickel/scrap sourcing) and global plant footprint, but steel is a cyclical commodity.

Headquarters: Madrid, Spain · Founded: 1970 · Employees: 9,156

Named competitors

Acerinox at a glance

Size Acerinox (ACX.MC) is a Spain Materials company (Steel) with a market value of $4.00B, the 31st largest of 97 Spain companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €14.94 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 1.6%, against -23.5% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Spain market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue was unchanged over the last twelve months (peer median -0.5%); the operating margin is 3.6% (peer median 3.8%).

Valuation It trades at 15.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.8× (8th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.1 points below its cost of capital (8.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ACX.MC 103Peer median 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Acerinox against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Acerinox financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€5.69B€5.78B€5.41B€6.61B€8.69B
Revenue growth—+7%-18%-24%—
Gross profit€1.11B€1.04B€1.03B€1.37B€2.24B
EBITDA€404M€343M€377M€679M€1.27B
Net income€54.1M-€40.1M€225M€228M€556M
Free cash flow€24.3M€151M€91.8M€310M€411M
Capital expenditure€333M€310M€205M€175M€137M
Total debtn/a€2.18B€2.40B€2.15B€2.00B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Acerinox competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%6002825444SIMTIINDIA00220300095900093220275406SZG000709VK002756002318600126004020APAMSGMACX.MC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Acerinox is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%20×40×60×6002825444SIMTIINDIA00220300095900093220275406SZG000709VK002756000825002318004020SGMACX.MCRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Acerinox is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%6002825444SIM00095900093220275406VK002756000825601123002318600126APAMSGMACX.MCGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Acerinox is the large dot.

Acerinox competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ACX.MC vs OUT1V.HE vs APAM.AS vs ATI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Acerinox ACX.MC$4.00B+2%0%4%15.8×18.6%
Outokumpu OUT1V.HE$1.99B-31%-7%-1%20.3×14.0%
Aperam APAM.AS$2.63B-32%-4%2%13.6×12.9%
ATI ATI$23.9B+11%+9%18%28.0×20.6%
POSCO 005490.KS$14.4B-42%+4%3%11.2×n/a

How Acerinox compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Acerinox against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureACX.MCPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-9.6%-5.7%7th lowest of 21
6-month return+1.6%-23.5%3rd highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-19.6%-38.5%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)0.0%-0.5%11th highest of 21
Operating margin3.6%3.8%10th lowest of 21
Forward P/E15.8×13.8×8th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)18.6%2.6%4th most demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.4%+5.7%7th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+14.2 pp-5.0 pp3rd most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.1 pp-1.3 pp8th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA12.2×7.9×4th most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA3.4×0.5×2nd most indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Acerinox ACX.MCSpain$4.00B+2%0%4%15.8×18.6%+4.4%
Nanjing Iron & Steel 600282.SSChina$3.99B-20%+12%5%9.5×-4.2%+1.8%
Yamato Kogyo 5444.TJapan$3.88B-13%+1%2%10.3×24.2%+3.4%
Grupo Simec SAB de CV Sponsored ADR SIMUnited States$4.22B+4%+17%16%14.1×-9.2%-1.1%
Tube Investments of India TIINDIA.NSIndia$4.47B-28%+18%7%42.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang Hailiang 002203.SZChina$4.53B-23%+10%2%17.6×n/an/a
Beijing Shougang 000959.SZChina$3.50B-34%-2%1%27.4×-9.7%+5.2%
Hunan Valin Steel 000932.SZChina$3.49B-27%-7%1%20.0×6.4%+0.9%
TA Chen Stainless Pipe 2027.TWTaiwan$3.46B+21%+24%18%8.0×-10.1%+11.4%
Kobe Steel 5406.TJapan$4.83B0%-3%5%7.7×-1.1%+7.4%
Salzgitter SZG.DEGermany$3.29B-14%-6%-1%10.5×n/an/a
HBIS 000709.SZChina$2.96B-16%-6%5%12.2×n/an/a
Vallourec VK.PAFrance$5.51B-31%-7%14%15.5×-7.6%+3.3%
Yongxing Special Materials Technology 002756.SZChina$2.88B-59%+30%16%11.2×-2.3%+8.4%
Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel 000825.SZChina$2.78B-24%+1%-1%65.0×7.4%+6.1%
Fujian Makeng Mining 601123.SSChina$2.76Bn/a-3%41%n/a29.1%-1.0%
Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals 002318.SZChina$2.75B-37%-38%4%25.9×15.4%+19.5%
Hangzhou Iron & Steel 600126.SSChina$2.73B-38%-58%-1%n/a19.3%+9.8%
Hyundai Steel 004020.KSSouth Korea$2.73B-34%+2%1%74.3×-1.2%+4.8%
Aperam APAM.ASNetherlands$2.63B-32%-4%2%13.6×12.9%+10.9%
Sims SGM.AXAustralia$2.62B-11%+7%4%10.5×14.6%+6.2%

Questions

Who are Acerinox's main competitors?
Named competitors: Outokumpu (OUT1V.HE), Aperam (APAM.AS), Allegheny Technologies (ATI), POSCO (005490.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Nanjing Iron & Steel (600282.SS), Yamato Kogyo (5444.T), Grupo Simec SAB de CV Sponsored ADR (SIM), Tube Investments of India (TIINDIA.NS), Zhejiang Hailiang (002203.SZ), Beijing Shougang (000959.SZ).
Is Acerinox expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.8× against a peer median of 13.8×, 8th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Acerinox stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +1.6% against -23.5% for the median peer; over one year +32.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.