Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › TIINDIA.NS Tube Investments of IndiaOpen in the cockpit ↗

Tube Investments of IndiaTIINDIA.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Metal & Mining›Steel

Murugappa-group engineering company making precision steel tubes, bicycles, metal-formed auto components and industrial chains, with a growing EV push.

Momentum laggard 9
Mkt cap
$4.47B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
56%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
42.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.7 pp
WACC 13.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
94 days
8 Feb 2027
Close · INR₹2,170
1D-5.7%
1W+2.4%
1M-9.1%
3M-21.2%
6M-28.0%
YTD-17.0%
1Y-29.1%
ATR %4.3%
Beta0.98
52w lowhigh34.9% off high

What Tube Investments of India does

Murugappa-group engineering company making precision steel tubes, bicycles, metal-formed auto components and industrial chains, with a growing EV push.

Buys steel and earns on converting it into tubes, strip and formed auto parts, so results depend on the gap between selling price and steel cost, with bicycles sold through retailers as a separate consumer line. The Murugappa group, a Chennai conglomerate, controls it, and a newer EV unit is still small.

Products and services

  • Precision steel tubes & strips
  • Bicycles (incl. BSA, Montra brands)
  • Metal-formed auto components
  • Industrial/roller chains
  • Electric vehicles (Montra Electric, via TI Clean Mobility)

Customers

  • Indian and global auto OEMs
  • Bicycle retailers/consumers
  • Industrial equipment makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Metal-formed components
  • Precision tubes / bicycles / auto parts

What could go right

  • Auto-component content growth per vehicle
  • EV/mobility diversification

What could go wrong

  • Auto-cycle sensitivity
  • Execution risk in new EV business

Moat: narrow (scale, brand, distribution). Long-standing Murugappa-group brand and OEM relationships across tubes, bicycles and auto components.

Headquarters: Chennai, India · Founded: 1949 · Employees: 19,253

Named competitors

Tube Investments of India at a glance

Size Tube Investments of India (TIINDIA.NS) is an India Materials company (Steel) with a market value of $4.47B, the 224th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹2,170 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 28.0%, against -13.7% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 17.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.7%); the operating margin is 6.7% (peer median 4.6%).

Valuation It trades at 42.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.0× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.7 points below its cost of capital (13.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 8 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 86TIINDIA.NS 71
Six months, rebased to 100: Tube Investments of India against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Tube Investments of India financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹238B₹228B₹195B₹169B₹150B
Revenue growth—+17%+15%+13%—
Gross profit₹50.8B₹35.4B₹31.2B₹27.8B₹24.5B
EBITDA₹22.8B₹23.4B₹20.6B₹20.4B₹19.1B
Net income₹6.07B₹6.37B₹6.74B₹12.1B₹9.56B
Free cash flown/a-₹2.74B-₹43.9M₹4.69B₹9.78B
Capital expendituren/a₹14.3B₹12.1B₹8.51B₹4.16B
Total debtn/a₹7.54B₹7.03B₹8.96B₹7.26B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tube Investments of India competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%-10%0%002203SIM5406ACX6002825444VK0009590009322027SZGJSLMINAPLAPOLLOCLF5411000709CMC002756TIINDIA.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tube Investments of India is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%20×40×002203SIM5406ACX6002825444VK0009590009322027SZGJSLMINAPLAPOLLOCLF5411000709CMC002756000825TIINDIA.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tube Investments of India is the large dot.

Tube Investments of India competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (TIINDIA.NS vs MOTHERSON.NS vs RML.NS vs BAJAJ-AUTO.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Tube Investments of India TIINDIA.NS$4.47B-28%+18%7%42.7×n/a
Samvardhana Motherson International MOTHERSON.NS$17.9B+22%+14%6%30.2×30.9%
Rane (Madras) RML.NS$367M+34%+42%5%n/an/a
Bajaj Auto BAJAJ-AUTO.NS$31.7B+3%+48%19%24.0×27.3%

How Tube Investments of India compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tube Investments of India against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTIINDIA.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-9.1%-4.6%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-28.0%-13.7%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-34.9%-27.6%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+17.6%+4.7%5th highest of 21
Operating margin6.7%4.6%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E42.7×13.0×2nd most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.7 pp-1.1 pp4th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA18.5×7.6×3rd most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-1.4×1.7×3rd least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Tube Investments of India TIINDIA.NSIndia$4.47B-28%+18%7%42.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang Hailiang 002203.SZChina$4.53B-23%+10%2%17.6×n/an/a
Grupo Simec SAB de CV Sponsored ADR SIMUnited States$4.22B+4%+17%16%14.1×-9.2%-1.1%
Kobe Steel 5406.TJapan$4.83B0%-3%5%7.7×-1.1%+7.4%
Acerinox ACX.MCSpain$4.00B+2%0%4%15.8×18.6%+4.4%
Nanjing Iron & Steel 600282.SSChina$3.99B-20%+12%5%9.5×-4.2%+1.8%
Yamato Kogyo 5444.TJapan$3.88B-13%+1%2%10.3×24.2%+3.4%
Vallourec VK.PAFrance$5.51B-31%-7%14%15.5×-7.6%+3.3%
Beijing Shougang 000959.SZChina$3.50B-34%-2%1%27.4×-9.7%+5.2%
Hunan Valin Steel 000932.SZChina$3.49B-27%-7%1%20.0×6.4%+0.9%
TA Chen Stainless Pipe 2027.TWTaiwan$3.46B+21%+24%18%8.0×-10.1%+11.4%
Salzgitter SZG.DEGermany$3.29B-14%-6%-1%10.5×n/an/a
Jindal Stainless JSL.NSIndia$6.10B-9%+12%10%16.9×21.0%+28.7%
Mineral Resources MIN.AXAustralia$6.36B-34%+44%25%13.8×4.2%+11.6%
APL Apollo Tubes APLAPOLLO.NSIndia$6.42B+11%+16%7%39.8×22.1%+22.1%
Cleveland-Cliffs CLFUnited States$6.54B+4%+8%-1%6.6×n/an/a
Jfe 5411.TJapan$6.66B+2%-4%2%8.4×13.2%+7.1%
HBIS 000709.SZChina$2.96B-16%-6%5%12.2×n/an/a
Commercial Metals CMCUnited States$6.85B-12%+20%9%9.3×6.2%+6.9%
Yongxing Special Materials Technology 002756.SZChina$2.88B-59%+30%16%11.2×-2.3%+8.4%
Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel 000825.SZChina$2.78B-24%+1%-1%65.0×7.4%+6.1%

Questions

Who are Tube Investments of India's main competitors?
Named competitors: Samvardhana Motherson International (MOTHERSON.NS), Hero Cycles (private or unlisted), Rane Group (RML.NS), Bajaj Auto (mobility) (BAJAJ-AUTO.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Zhejiang Hailiang (002203.SZ), Grupo Simec SAB de CV Sponsored ADR (SIM), Kobe Steel (5406.T), Acerinox (ACX.MC), Nanjing Iron & Steel (600282.SS), Yamato Kogyo (5444.T).
Is Tube Investments of India expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 42.7× against a peer median of 13.0×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Tube Investments of India stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -28.0% against -13.7% for the median peer; over one year -29.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.