Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › OUT1V.HE Outokumpu OyjOpen in the cockpit ↗

Outokumpu OyjOUT1V.HECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Finland · EUR·Materials›Steel

Produces stainless steel for construction, transportation, process industries and consumer goods.

Momentum laggard 3
Mkt cap
$1.99B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$6.25M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
20.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-11.4 pp
WACC 10.6%
Hurdle
+15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · EUR€3.79
1D-15.7%
1W-15.2%
1M-22.1%
3M-33.8%
6M-31.3%
YTD-15.3%
1Y+5.0%
ATR %5.6%
52w lowhigh39.1% off high

What Outokumpu does

Produces stainless steel for construction, transportation, process industries and consumer goods.

Prices stainless steel as a base price plus an alloy surcharge that follows the cost of nickel, chromium and molybdenum, so what it earns is the margin above those metals; it also recycles scrap into new steel. Finland's Tornio works, where it also mines chrome, is the main plant.

Products and services

  • Stainless steel coil/sheet/plate
  • Ferrochrome (raw material, via Tornio site)

Customers

  • Construction and infrastructure companies
  • Automotive/transportation OEMs
  • Industrial equipment makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Stainless steel production
  • Melting, casting, rolling of stainless…

What could go right

  • Stainless steel demand from green infrastructure/energy transition

What could go wrong

  • Stainless steel price cyclicality/overcapacity (esp. Chinese exports)
  • Energy cost exposure in melting/production

Moat: narrow (scale, cost advantage). Integrated ferrochrome-to-stainless-steel production at Tornio gives a raw-material cost advantage.

Headquarters: Helsinki, Finland · Employees: 8,251

Named competitors

Outokumpu at a glance

Size Outokumpu (OUT1V.HE) is a Finland Materials company (Steel) with a market value of $1.99B, the 25th largest of 65 Finland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €3.79 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 31.3%, against -20.0% for the median peer and -2.9% for the Finland market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 7.5% over the last twelve months (peer median -0.2%); the operating margin is -0.7% (peer median 5.9%).

Valuation It trades at 20.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.0× (7th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 14% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -1%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.4 points below its cost of capital (10.6% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 78OUT1V.HE 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Outokumpu against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Outokumpu financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€5.49B€5.47B€5.94B€6.96B€9.49B
Revenue growth—-8%-15%-27%—
Gross profit€259M€180M€223M€479M€1.34B
EBITDA€180M€133M€133M€432M€1.28B
Net income-€81.0M-€137M-€40.0M-€103M€1.15B
Free cash flow€90.0M-€39.0M-€26.0M€196M€630M
Capital expenditure€117M€143M€211M€146M€155M
Total debt€594M€627M€502M€441M€632M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Outokumpu competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%600022000778WS2006KIOCLRATNAMANI03230009695471000758ALLEIJINDALSAW601969SARDAEN0347SGMAPAM002290OUT1V.HE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Outokumpu is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%10×20×30×40×600022000778WS2006RATNAMANI03230009695471002978ALLEIJINDALSAW601969SGM002290OUT1V.HERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Outokumpu is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%600022000778WS2006RATNAMANI03230009695471002978ALLEIJINDALSAW601969SARDAENSGM002290OUT1V.HEGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Outokumpu is the large dot.

Outokumpu competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (OUT1V.HE vs APAM.AS vs ACX.MC vs 005490.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Outokumpu OUT1V.HE$1.99B-31%-7%-1%20.3×14.0%
Aperam APAM.AS$2.63B-32%-4%2%13.6×12.9%
Acerinox ACX.MC$4.00B+2%0%4%15.8×18.6%
POSCO 005490.KS$14.4B-42%+4%3%11.2×n/a

How Outokumpu compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Outokumpu against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureOUT1V.HEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-22.1%-8.2%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-31.3%-20.0%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-39.1%-38.5%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-7.5%-0.2%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin-0.7%5.9%4th lowest of 20
Forward P/E20.3×18.0×7th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)14.0%10.6%7th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)-0.7%+7.0%5th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+14.7 pp+5.5 pp3rd most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-11.4 pp-3.1 pp3rd lowest of 20
Net debt / EBITDA1.2×1.1×5th most indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Outokumpu OUT1V.HEFinland$1.99B-31%-7%-1%20.3×14.0%-0.7%
Shandong Iron and Steel 600022.SSChina$1.98B-12%-10%n/a12.6×1.3%-5.1%
Xinxing Ductile Iron Pipes 000778.SZChina$2.05B-24%+15%2%20.5×-6.9%-2.8%
Worthington Steel WSUnited States$1.88B-9%+69%3%9.7×26.5%-1.5%
Tung Ho Steel Enterprise 2006.TWTaiwan$1.86B+26%-4%12%11.2×-10.3%+6.2%
KIOCL KIOCL.NSIndia$2.15B-18%+27%-6%n/an/an/a
Ratnamani Metals & Tubes RATNAMANI.NSIndia$1.83B-13%-16%14%31.8×27.4%+14.4%
Maanshan Iron & Steel 0323.HKHong Kong$2.27B-50%0%0%18.0×3.8%-1.7%
Advanced Technology & Materials 000969.SZChina$2.28B-32%+37%5%40.2×16.2%+9.8%
Daido Steel 5471.TJapan$2.29B-4%+8%7%10.8×8.8%+7.0%
Sichuan Anning Iron and Titanium 002978.SZChina$1.72B-22%-10%41%18.4×6.1%+4.2%
China Nonferrous Metal Industry's Foreign Engineering and Construction 000758.SZChina$1.72B-17%+42%7%n/a9.1%+8.4%
Alleima ALLEI.STSweden$2.32B+9%-5%7%21.5×12.9%+0.4%
Jindal Saw JINDALSAW.NSIndia$1.70B+4%-1%6%22.7×17.5%+10.9%
Chongqing Iron & Steel 1053.HKHong Kong$1.64B-27%-8%-13%n/an/an/a
Hainan Mining 601969.SSChina$2.44B-33%+29%17%13.9×0.8%+9.9%
Sarda Energy & Minerals SARDAEN.NSIndia$1.63B-27%-2%26%n/a10.6%+20.9%
Angang Steel 0347.HKHong Kong$2.48B-32%-1%-7%n/an/an/a
Sims SGM.AXAustralia$2.62B-11%+7%4%10.5×14.6%+6.2%
Aperam APAM.ASNetherlands$2.63B-32%-4%2%13.6×12.9%+10.9%
Suzhou Hesheng Special Material 002290.SZChina$1.51B-50%+1%7%42.2×34.8%+7.1%

Questions

Who are Outokumpu's main competitors?
Named competitors: Aperam (APAM.AS), Acerinox (ACX.MC), POSCO (005490.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shandong Iron and Steel (600022.SS), Xinxing Ductile Iron Pipes (000778.SZ), Worthington Steel (WS), Tung Ho Steel Enterprise (2006.TW), KIOCL (KIOCL.NS), Ratnamani Metals & Tubes (RATNAMANI.NS).
Is Outokumpu expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 20.3× against a peer median of 18.0×, 7th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 14% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -1%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Outokumpu stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -31.3% against -20.0% for the median peer; over one year +5.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.