Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9962.T MISUMI Group Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

MISUMI Group Inc.9962.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Sells configurable mechanical, electronic and factory automation components via a fast-delivery catalog model.

≈ Japan's McMaster-Carr for factory automation partsMomentum neutral 42
Mkt cap
$6.25B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
91%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$50.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.7 pp
WACC 9.9%
Hurdle
+2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
77 days
22 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥3,681
1D-6.5%
1W-3.8%
1M-11.1%
3M-6.9%
6M+2.6%
YTD+50.4%
1Y+56.6%
ATR %5.1%
52w lowhigh12.4% off high

What MISUMI does

Sells configurable mechanical, electronic and factory automation components via a fast-delivery catalog model.

Takes orders from catalogue and website for parts made to the customer's dimensions and ships them within days, earning a premium for convenience and short lead times rather than selling only off-the-shelf stock. Factory-automation parts carry the group, with a growing share of orders placed through its Meviy service, where an engineer uploads a 3D drawing and gets a quote at once.

In one line: Japan's McMaster-Carr for factory automation parts.

Products and services

  • Mechanical components (FA)
  • Die/mold components
  • Configurable parts platform

Customers

  • Factory automation engineers
  • Machine builders/manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial distribution
  • Configurable component…
  • Factory automation parts catalog + fast…

What could go right

  • Global factory automation growth

What could go wrong

  • Manufacturing capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (distribution, scale, switching costs). Vast configurable-parts catalog and fast delivery create engineer habit and switching friction.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1963 · Employees: 11,304

Named competitors

MISUMI at a glance

Size MISUMI (9962.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $6.25B, the 202nd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,681 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 2.6%, against -3.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 24.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.5%); the operating margin is 12.8% (peer median 16.7%).

Valuation It trades at 17.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 25.2× (5th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.7 points above its cost of capital (9.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 22 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269962.T 107Peer median 97
Six months, rebased to 100: MISUMI against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

MISUMI financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥509B¥441B¥402B¥368B¥373B
Revenue growth—+10%+9%-1%—
Gross profit¥242B¥189B¥173B¥154B¥171B
EBITDA¥87.3B¥67.8B¥64.2B¥55.9B¥63.2B
Net income¥51.5B¥40.5B¥36.5B¥28.2B¥34.3B
Free cash flow¥51.5B¥37.9B¥45.0B¥36.6B¥17.8B
Capital expenditure¥15.5B¥14.3B¥15.4B¥18.0B¥13.6B
Total debtn/a¥8.77B¥7.54B¥6.82B¥7.68B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

MISUMI competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-25%0%+25%MIDD688188WELCORP1590VALMT688037JBTM688200GFMYCRTKR002837NPO002472ZWSRORSPX30819962.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. MISUMI is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%50×100×150×MIDD688188WELCORPINDOMIM1590VALMT6880373757688200GF002837NPOROR30819962.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. MISUMI is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%MIDD688188WELCORPINDOMIM1590VALMTJBTM3757688200GFMYCRTKR002837NPO002472ZWSRORSPX9962.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. MISUMI is the large dot.

MISUMI competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9962.T vs RS1.L vs GWW vs 3064.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
MISUMI 9962.T$6.25B+3%+24%13%17.9×9.3%
RS Group PLC RS1.L$4.85B+33%-1%8%18.6×15.1%
W. W. Grainger GWW$67.9B+17%+9%17%28.2×11.9%
MonotaRO 3064.T$7.04B+22%+19%14%29.6×9.7%
Trusco Nakayama 9830.T$958M+6%+10%7%9.4×n/a
Fastenal FAST$60.8B+20%+14%21%38.3×14.2%

How MISUMI compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

MISUMI against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9962.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.1%-10.5%10th lowest of 21
6-month return+2.6%-3.7%7th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-12.4%-23.7%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+24.3%+16.5%6th highest of 21
Operating margin12.8%16.7%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E17.9×25.2×5th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.3%19.3%5th least demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.3%+12.0%8th lowest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.0 pp+9.5 pp9th least demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.7 pp+3.3 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA10.0×14.9×3rd cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA-1.2×0.7×2nd least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
MISUMI 9962.TJapan$6.25B+3%+24%13%17.9×9.3%+7.3%
Middleby MIDDUnited States$6.17B+3%-7%17%18.5×6.9%+5.0%
Shanghai BOCHU Electronic Technology 688188.SSChina$6.16B0%+20%44%29.6×18.0%+30.9%
Welspun WELCORP.NSIndia$6.13B+70%+14%12%25.5×24.9%+19.0%
INDO-MIM INDOMIM.NSIndia$6.39Bn/a+26%20%60.8×30.3%+15.8%
Airtac International 1590.TWTaiwan$6.11B-30%+23%33%15.8×5.0%+12.4%
Valmet VALMT.HEFinland$5.97B+30%+3%10%13.8×2.1%+6.8%
KINGSEMI 688037.SSChina$6.56B-7%+41%-5%264.1×n/an/a
JBT Marel JBTMUnited States$6.66B-8%+20%10%14.2×12.7%+17.0%
Robotechnik Intelligent Technology 3757.HKHong Kong$6.76Bn/a+217%9%140.6×53.9%+11.6%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology 688200.SSChina$6.87B-4%+44%36%50.0×47.7%+27.6%
Georg Fischer GF.SWSwitzerland$5.65B+32%-20%3%19.9×29.2%-1.2%
Mycronic MYCR.STSweden$5.57B-4%+17%29%24.9×10.1%+15.6%
Timken TKRUnited States$7.07B-14%+6%15%14.5×3.7%+5.5%
Shenzhen Envicool Technology 002837.SZChina$7.13B-49%+22%9%53.5×56.2%+29.0%
Enpro NPOUnited States$5.47B-16%+16%16%23.2×26.1%+1.3%
Zhejiang Shuanghuan Driveline 002472.SZChina$5.46B+9%+15%15%26.9×11.0%+20.0%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions ZWSUnited States$7.18B-15%+10%23%21.8×10.9%-2.4%
Rotork ROR.LUnited Kingdom$5.40B+65%+2%24%27.9×27.6%+5.2%
Spirax SPX.LUnited Kingdom$7.24B+2%+5%18%22.7×20.5%+7.4%
LandMark Optoelectronics 3081.TWOTaiwan$5.38B-32%+105%38%54.3×n/an/a

Questions

Who are MISUMI's main competitors?
Named competitors: RS Group (RS1.L), Grainger (GWW), MonotaRO (3064.T), Trusco Nakayama (9830.T), Fastenal (FAST). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Middleby (MIDD), Shanghai BOCHU Electronic Technology (688188.SS), Welspun (WELCORP.NS), INDO-MIM (INDOMIM.NS), Airtac International (1590.TW), Valmet (VALMT.HE).
Is MISUMI expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.9× against a peer median of 25.2×, 5th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has MISUMI stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +2.6% against -3.7% for the median peer; over one year +56.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.