Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9830.T Trusco Nakayama CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Trusco Nakayama Corporation9830.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors
Momentum neutral 55
Mkt cap
$958M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
65%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.08M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.8 pp
WACC 5.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
91 days
5 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥2,291
1D-4.9%
1W-5.1%
1M-3.5%
3M-4.5%
6M+5.9%
YTD-4.7%
1Y-5.8%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh16.8% off high

What Trusco Nakayama does

Employees: 1,809

Trusco Nakayama at a glance

Size Trusco Nakayama (9830.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $958M, the 753rd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,291 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.9%, against -15.6% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.2%); the operating margin is 6.8% (peer median 4.4%).

Valuation It trades at 9.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.8× (3rd cheapest of 12).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.8 points above its cost of capital (5.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 5 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269830.T 106Peer median 85
Six months, rebased to 100: Trusco Nakayama against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Trusco Nakayama financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥349B¥320B¥295B¥268B¥246B
Revenue growth—+8%+10%+9%—
Gross profit¥64.8B¥61.2B¥55.6B¥51.3B¥45.5B
EBITDA¥30.8B¥28.4B¥26.1B¥24.7B¥21.4B
Net income¥16.4B¥15.9B¥16.1B¥12.3B¥10.6B
Free cash flown/a-¥10.3B-¥6.27B¥3.63B¥8.36B
Capital expendituren/a¥21.9B¥21.8B¥13.1B¥4.93B
Total debt¥90.0B¥80.0B¥56.5B¥50.0B¥45.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Trusco Nakayama competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%6050113011626008260007518051APR09909960001120301081317456SPB988260031325908037300893SNLBYW9830.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Trusco Nakayama is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%0×200×400×301162600826APR99600011207456SPB25903008939830.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Trusco Nakayama is the large dot.

Trusco Nakayama competitors and peer comparison

How Trusco Nakayama compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Trusco Nakayama against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9830.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.5%-10.9%6th highest of 21
6-month return+5.9%-15.6%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-16.8%-33.8%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.4%+7.2%10th highest of 20
Operating margin6.8%4.4%9th highest of 20
Forward P/E9.4×13.8×3rd cheapest of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.8 pp+2.6 pp9th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA6.3×7.7×3rd cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×0.1×3rd most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Trusco Nakayama 9830.TJapan$958M+6%+10%7%9.4×n/an/a
Hangzhou Cogeneration 605011.SSChina$956M-23%-1%5%n/an/an/a
State Power Rixin Technology 301162.SZChina$944M-25%+12%17%36.8×22.6%+23.8%
Dlg Exhibitions & Events 600826.SSChina$944M-9%+2%15%18.7×6.9%-11.5%
Huludao Zinc Industry 000751.SZChina$943M-36%+17%1%n/an/an/a
Yamazen 8051.TJapan$978M+13%+7%2%n/a-6.3%+4.5%
Auto Partner APR.WAPoland$928M+26%+67%8%12.2×-5.0%+21.5%
Deep Source 0990.HKHong Kong$1.00B-31%+7%2%n/a-13.6%+6.1%
Totech 9960.TJapan$1.00B0%+6%10%10.7×5.4%+9.2%
Lx International 001120.KSSouth Korea$913M-35%+11%2%4.6×n/an/a
Wah Lee Industrial 3010.TWTaiwan$910M-15%+6%4%11.4×-6.5%+5.8%
Mitsuuroko 8131.TJapan$893M+26%0%3%n/a-3.7%+8.4%
Matsuda Sangyo 7456.TJapan$891M-12%+49%4%5.6×n/an/a
Superior Plus SPB.TOCanada$890M-22%-7%8%13.8×-1.3%+13.7%
Yellow Hat 9882.TJapan$888M+12%+7%9%n/a-5.5%+3.1%
China Agricultural Development Seed 600313.SSChina$1.04B-16%+35%1%n/a21.8%+12.7%
Beijing Geekplus Technology 2590.HKHong Kong$1.05B-67%+33%0%478.1×n/an/a
Kamei 8037.TJapan$869M+40%+1%3%n/a-13.1%+7.6%
Zhejiang Songyuan Automotive Safety Systems 300893.SZChina$1.06B-34%+27%12%20.1×n/an/a
Supply Network SNL.AXAustralia$1.06B+12%+16%17%26.9×11.7%+19.9%
BayWa BYW.DEGermany$1.07B-58%n/an/an/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Trusco Nakayama's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hangzhou Cogeneration (605011.SS), State Power Rixin Technology (301162.SZ), Dlg Exhibitions & Events (600826.SS), Huludao Zinc Industry (000751.SZ), Yamazen (8051.T), Auto Partner (APR.WA), Deep Source (0990.HK), Totech (9960.T).
Is Trusco Nakayama expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.4× against a peer median of 13.8×, 3rd cheapest of 12 in its peer set.
How has Trusco Nakayama stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.9% against -15.6% for the median peer; over one year -5.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.