Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9960.T Totech CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Totech Corporation9960.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors

Japanese maker and lessor of moisture-control 'dry room' and dehumidification equipment used in battery, semiconductor and precision manufacturing plants.

≈ A niche industrial dry-room/dehumidification equipment specialistMomentum neutral 43
Mkt cap
$1.00B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
56%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.67M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
10.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.6 pp
WACC 9.8%
Hurdle
-4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥3,790
1D-7.3%
1W-13.1%
1M-11.2%
3M-2.8%
6M-0.3%
YTD+3.4%
1Y+19.4%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh17.4% off high

What Totech does

Japanese maker and lessor of moisture-control 'dry room' and dehumidification equipment used in battery, semiconductor and precision manufacturing plants.

In one line: A niche industrial dry-room/dehumidification equipment specialist.

Products and services

  • Dry room systems (rental/sale)
  • Industrial dehumidifiers
  • Related equipment distribution

Customers

  • Lithium-ion battery makers
  • Semiconductor and precision electronics manufactur

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial equipment
  • Moisture control systems
  • Dry rooms & dehumidification for…

What could go right

  • EV battery gigafactory capex boom
  • Semiconductor fab expansion

What could go wrong

  • Battery/chip capex cyclicality
  • Customer concentration in a few large plants

Moat: narrow (process know-how, installed base). Specialized dry-room engineering know-how is critical for battery/chip production lines, creating customer stickiness.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1971 · Employees: 2,855

Named competitors

Totech at a glance

Size Totech (9960.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $1.00B, the 736th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,790 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 0.3%, against -19.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.3%); the operating margin is 9.8% (peer median 3.9%).

Valuation It trades at 10.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.4× (5th cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.6 points above its cost of capital (9.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269960.T 97Peer median 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Totech against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Totech financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥171B¥170B¥156B¥141B¥127B
Revenue growth—+9%+11%+11%—
Gross profit¥47.9B¥47.5B¥41.7B¥34.0B¥31.1B
EBITDA¥19.0B¥19.4B¥16.5B¥11.8B¥9.62B
Net income¥12.9B¥13.1B¥11.2B¥7.00B¥5.23B
Free cash flown/a¥3.86B¥12.6B¥8.53B¥454M
Capital expendituren/a¥6.31B¥1.51B¥1.53B¥4.34B
Total debt¥8.21B¥7.08B¥4.82B¥9.88B¥13.3B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Totech competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%0990805160031398306050112590300893301162SNL600826000751BYWAPR00112000299330108415002173813174569960.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Totech is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×200×400×98302590300893301162SNL600826APR00299374569960.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Totech is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%09908051600313301162SNL600826APR3010841581319960.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Totech is the large dot.

Totech competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9960.T vs 1979.T vs 6367.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Totech 9960.T$1.00B0%+6%10%10.7×5.4%
Taikisha 1979.T$1.32B-5%-1%8%10.6×-13.3%
Daikin Industries 6367.T$40.4B-1%+11%8%21.8×7.4%

How Totech compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Totech against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9960.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.2%-8.0%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-0.3%-19.7%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.4%-36.6%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.3%+11.3%6th lowest of 20
Operating margin9.8%3.9%6th highest of 20
Forward P/E10.7×15.4×5th cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.4%-4.3%5th most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.2%+8.6%5th highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-3.7 pp-11.5 pp4th most demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.6 pp+1.8 pp3rd highest of 20
EV / EBITDA8.1×7.8×2nd most expensive of 6
Net debt / EBITDA-0.2×0.6×4th least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Totech 9960.TJapan$1.00B0%+6%10%10.7×5.4%+9.2%
Deep Source 0990.HKHong Kong$1.00B-31%+7%2%n/a-13.6%+6.1%
Yamazen 8051.TJapan$978M+13%+7%2%n/a-6.3%+4.5%
China Agricultural Development Seed 600313.SSChina$1.04B-16%+35%1%n/a21.8%+12.7%
Trusco Nakayama 9830.TJapan$958M+6%+10%7%9.4×n/an/a
Hangzhou Cogeneration 605011.SSChina$956M-23%-1%5%n/an/an/a
Beijing Geekplus Technology 2590.HKHong Kong$1.05B-67%+33%0%478.1×n/an/a
Zhejiang Songyuan Automotive Safety Systems 300893.SZChina$1.06B-34%+27%12%20.1×n/an/a
State Power Rixin Technology 301162.SZChina$944M-25%+12%17%36.8×22.6%+23.8%
Supply Network SNL.AXAustralia$1.06B+12%+16%17%26.9×11.7%+19.9%
Dlg Exhibitions & Events 600826.SSChina$944M-9%+2%15%18.7×6.9%-11.5%
Huludao Zinc Industry 000751.SZChina$943M-36%+17%1%n/an/an/a
BayWa BYW.DEGermany$1.07B-58%n/an/an/an/an/a
Auto Partner APR.WAPoland$928M+26%+67%8%12.2×-5.0%+21.5%
Lx International 001120.KSSouth Korea$913M-35%+11%2%4.6×n/an/a
Dongguan Aohai Technology 002993.SZChina$1.10B-44%+122%1%19.6×n/an/a
Wah Lee Industrial 3010.TWTaiwan$910M-15%+6%4%11.4×-6.5%+5.8%
Brighton-Best International (Taiwan) 8415.TWOTaiwan$1.11B+5%+11%20%7.8×-8.8%+8.8%
Innovation Medical Management 002173.SZChina$1.12B-29%-13%-18%n/an/an/a
Mitsuuroko 8131.TJapan$893M+26%0%3%n/a-3.7%+8.4%
Matsuda Sangyo 7456.TJapan$891M-12%+49%4%5.6×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Totech's main competitors?
Named competitors: Taikisha (1979.T), Daikin Industries (6367.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Deep Source (0990.HK), Yamazen (8051.T), China Agricultural Development Seed (600313.SS), Trusco Nakayama (9830.T), Hangzhou Cogeneration (605011.SS), Beijing Geekplus Technology (2590.HK).
Is Totech expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 10.7× against a peer median of 15.4×, 5th cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Totech stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -0.3% against -19.7% for the median peer; over one year +19.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.