Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3081.TWO LandMark Optoelectronics Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

LandMark Optoelectronics Corp.3081.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Makes compound-semiconductor epitaxial wafers used in VCSEL lasers for 3D sensing and optical communication.

≈ A niche epi-wafer supplier feeding VCSEL chipmakers like LumentumMomentum weak 20
Mkt cap
$5.38B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
87%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$281M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
54.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+16.1 pp
WACC 13.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
89 days
3 Feb 2027
Close · TWDNT$1,750
1D-7.4%
1W-26.2%
1M-41.7%
3M-10.9%
6M-31.6%
YTD+214.0%
1Y+350.3%
ATR %11.9%
52w lowhigh51.4% off high

What LandMark Optoelectronics does

Makes compound-semiconductor epitaxial wafers used in VCSEL lasers for 3D sensing and optical communication.

Grows crystal layers on wafers to its customers' recipes, then sells these epitaxial wafers to chipmakers that cut them into lasers, so it is a materials supplier in the optical chip chain rather than a chipmaker. Orders follow demand for 3D sensing in phones and for optical modules in data centers.

In one line: A niche epi-wafer supplier feeding VCSEL chipmakers like Lumentum.

Products and services

  • VCSEL epi wafers
  • Laser diode epi wafers
  • Photodetector epi wafers

Customers

  • VCSEL chip makers (Lumentum, Coherent)
  • Optical communication module makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Compound semiconductor epitaxy
  • VCSEL/laser diode epi wafers

What could go right

  • 3D sensing/Face-ID content growth
  • AR/VR and lidar demand

What could go wrong

  • Smartphone unit cyclicality
  • Customer concentration

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Specialized epitaxy process know-how qualified into major VCSEL chipmakers' supply chains.

Headquarters: Hsinchu, Taiwan · Founded: 1996 · Employees: 362

Named competitors

LandMark Optoelectronics at a glance

Size LandMark Optoelectronics (3081.TWO) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $5.38B, the 87th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$1,750 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 31.6%, against -11.7% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 105.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.2%); the operating margin is 38.0% (peer median 15.7%).

Valuation It trades at 54.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.9× (most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 16.1 points above its cost of capital (13.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 893081.TWO 73
Six months, rebased to 100: LandMark Optoelectronics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

LandMark Optoelectronics financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$3.32BNT$2.20BNT$1.21BNT$1.06BNT$2.38B
Revenue growth—+82%+14%-56%—
Gross profitNT$1.71BNT$894MNT$185MNT$87.2MNT$709M
EBITDANT$1.56BNT$817MNT$280MNT$178MNT$811M
Net incomeNT$1.08BNT$428M-NT$54.5M-NT$212MNT$330M
Free cash flowNT$87.6MNT$627MNT$306MNT$88.5MNT$276M
Capital expenditureNT$844MNT$108MNT$81.6MNT$151MNT$461M
Total debtNT$342MNT$290MNT$297MNT$306MNT$313M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

LandMark Optoelectronics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-25%0%+25%ROR002472NPOMYCRESABGFKGX6465VALMT685615909880WELCORPAAON603298688188300776MIDD6036993081.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. LandMark Optoelectronics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×ROR002472NPOMYCRESABGFKGX1590WELCORPAAON688188300776MIDD96303081.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. LandMark Optoelectronics is the large dot.

LandMark Optoelectronics competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3081.TWO vs IQE.L vs 3105.TWO vs COHR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
LandMark Optoelectronics 3081.TWO$5.38B-32%+105%38%54.3×n/a
IQE IQE.L$514M-39%+20%-11%n/an/a
Win Semiconductors 3105.TWO$5.19B-27%+24%11%28.5×48.8%
Coherent COHR$38.0B-42%+23%14%16.6×n/a
Sanan Optoelectronics 600703.SS$6.87B-33%-22%-7%n/an/a

How LandMark Optoelectronics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

LandMark Optoelectronics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3081.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-41.7%-3.3%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-31.6%-11.7%4th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-51.4%-28.9%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+105.1%+12.2%highest of 21
Operating margin38.0%15.7%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E54.3×19.9×most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+16.1 pp+3.8 pp5th highest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA-0.8×1.4×5th least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
LandMark Optoelectronics 3081.TWOTaiwan$5.38B-32%+105%38%54.3×n/an/a
Rotork ROR.LUnited Kingdom$5.40B+65%+2%24%27.9×27.6%+5.2%
Zhejiang Shuanghuan Driveline 002472.SZChina$5.46B+9%+15%15%26.9×11.0%+20.0%
Enpro NPOUnited States$5.47B-16%+16%16%23.2×26.1%+1.3%
Mycronic MYCR.STSweden$5.57B-4%+17%29%24.9×10.1%+15.6%
ESAB ESABUnited States$5.15B-18%+11%13%14.0×12.7%+7.8%
Georg Fischer GF.SWSwitzerland$5.65B+32%-20%3%19.9×29.2%-1.2%
Kion KGX.DEGermany$5.05B-25%+3%6%10.4×n/an/a
HOSHIZAKI 6465.TJapan$4.93B+5%+12%10%17.8×-4.5%+15.3%
Valmet VALMT.HEFinland$5.97B+30%+3%10%13.8×2.1%+6.8%
Horiba 6856.TJapan$4.79B-17%+12%17%14.4×11.2%+12.2%
Airtac International 1590.TWTaiwan$6.11B-30%+23%33%15.8×5.0%+12.4%
UBTECH ROBOTICS 9880.HKHong Kong$4.73B-41%+90%-21%n/an/an/a
Welspun WELCORP.NSIndia$6.13B+70%+14%12%25.5×24.9%+19.0%
AAON AAONUnited States$4.72B-59%+54%11%20.7×n/an/a
Hangcha 603298.SSChina$4.71B-12%+7%12%13.3×2.9%+9.1%
Shanghai BOCHU Electronic Technology 688188.SSChina$6.16B0%+20%44%29.6×18.0%+30.9%
Wuhan DR Laser Technology 300776.SZChina$4.69B-24%-23%19%37.9×51.8%+13.6%
Middleby MIDDUnited States$6.17B+3%-7%17%18.5×6.9%+5.0%
Circuit Fabology Microelectronics Equipment 9630.HKHong Kong$4.68Bn/a+103%27%36.1×8.5%+34.4%
Neway Valve (Suzhou) 603699.SSChina$4.66B-36%+11%26%17.9×10.0%+16.5%

Questions

Who are LandMark Optoelectronics's main competitors?
Named competitors: IQE plc (IQE.L), Visual Photonics Epitaxy (3105.TWO), Coherent (COHR), Sanan Optoelectronics (600703.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Rotork (ROR.L), Zhejiang Shuanghuan Driveline (002472.SZ), Enpro (NPO), Mycronic (MYCR.ST), ESAB (ESAB), Georg Fischer (GF.SW).
Is LandMark Optoelectronics expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 54.3× against a peer median of 19.9×, most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has LandMark Optoelectronics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -31.6% against -11.7% for the median peer; over one year +350.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.