Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MIDD Middleby CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Middleby CorporationMIDDCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Makes commercial kitchen equipment (ovens, ranges, fryers) for restaurants and foodservice chains worldwide.

Momentum leader 80
Mkt cap
$6.17B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$59.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.0 pp
WACC 9.9%
Hurdle
+2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · USD$136.50
1D+4.9%
1W+14.8%
1M+29.5%
3M+4.8%
6M+3.0%
YTD+14.1%
1Y+37.4%
ATR %2.9%
Beta0.92
52w lowhigh8.1% off high

What Middleby does

Makes commercial kitchen equipment (ovens, ranges, fryers) for restaurants and foodservice chains worldwide.

Sells through a mix of dealers, distributors and direct to large chains, and has grown mainly by buying specialist brands, which it keeps under their own names. Commercial foodservice equipment is the base, with food-processing machinery for industrial bakeries and meat plants and Viking home appliances alongside.

Products and services

  • Cooking equipment
  • Food prep/refrigeration
  • Residential kitchen (Viking)

Customers

  • Restaurant chains
  • Foodservice operators
  • Dealers/distributors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial machinery
  • Commercial foodservice equipment
  • Equipment sales to restaurants/chains

What could go right

  • Restaurant chain equipment refresh cycles
  • Automation adoption

What could go wrong

  • Restaurant capex cyclicality
  • Post-spinoff scale reduction (food processing exited)

Moat: narrow (brand, scale, installed base). Broad multi-brand equipment portfolio and chain-restaurant relationships built over decades.

Headquarters: Elgin, Illinois, United States · Founded: 1888 · Employees: 8,826

Named competitors

Middleby at a glance

Size Middleby (MIDD) is a United States Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $6.17B, the 1045th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $136.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 3.0%, against -3.7% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 7.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +18.2%); the operating margin is 17.1% (peer median 15.7%).

Valuation It trades at 18.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 25.2× (6th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.0 points above its cost of capital (9.9% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 3.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MIDD 109Peer median 97
Six months, rebased to 100: Middleby against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Middleby financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.56B$3.20B$3.15B$4.04B$4.03B
Revenue growth—+2%-22%0%—
Gross profit$1.30B$1.26B$1.25B$1.51B$1.41B
EBITDA$716M$690M$762M$857M$785M
Net income-$376M-$278M$428M$401M$437M
Free cash flow$496M$559M$650M$544M$265M
Capital expenditure$34.7M$71.8M$36.8M$87.0M$69.5M
Total debt$2.00B$2.29B$2.48B$2.54B$2.83B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Middleby competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-25%0%+25%688188WELCORP15909962VALMT688037JBTMGFMYCR688200NPO002472RORTKR3081002837ZWSSPXMIDD6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Middleby is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%50×100×150×688188WELCORP1590VALMTINDOMIM688037GF3757688200NPOROR3081002837MIDDRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Middleby is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%688188WELCORP15909962VALMTINDOMIMJBTMGF3757MYCR688200NPO002472RORTKR002837ZWSSPXMIDDGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Middleby is the large dot.

Middleby competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MIDD vs ITW vs SXI vs 6465.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Middleby MIDD$6.17B+3%-7%17%18.5×6.9%
Illinois Tool Works ITW$79.8B+11%+5%27%23.4×9.7%
Standex International SXI$2.76B-13%+8%18%20.9×15.2%
HOSHIZAKI 6465.T$4.93B+5%+12%10%17.8×-4.5%

How Middleby compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Middleby against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMIDDPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+29.5%-10.9%highest of 21
6-month return+3.0%-3.7%6th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-8.1%-23.7%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-7.2%+18.2%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin17.1%15.7%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E18.5×25.2×6th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)6.9%19.3%4th least demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.0%+12.0%4th lowest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.0 pp+9.5 pp8th least demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.0 pp+4.1 pp9th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA11.2×14.9×4th cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA2.6×0.3×2nd most indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Middleby MIDDUnited States$6.17B+3%-7%17%18.5×6.9%+5.0%
Shanghai BOCHU Electronic Technology 688188.SSChina$6.16B0%+20%44%29.6×18.0%+30.9%
Welspun WELCORP.NSIndia$6.13B+70%+14%12%25.5×24.9%+19.0%
Airtac International 1590.TWTaiwan$6.11B-30%+23%33%15.8×5.0%+12.4%
MISUMI 9962.TJapan$6.25B+3%+24%13%17.9×9.3%+7.3%
Valmet VALMT.HEFinland$5.97B+30%+3%10%13.8×2.1%+6.8%
INDO-MIM INDOMIM.NSIndia$6.39Bn/a+26%20%60.8×30.3%+15.8%
KINGSEMI 688037.SSChina$6.56B-7%+41%-5%264.1×n/an/a
JBT Marel JBTMUnited States$6.66B-8%+20%10%14.2×12.7%+17.0%
Georg Fischer GF.SWSwitzerland$5.65B+32%-20%3%19.9×29.2%-1.2%
Robotechnik Intelligent Technology 3757.HKHong Kong$6.76Bn/a+217%9%140.6×53.9%+11.6%
Mycronic MYCR.STSweden$5.57B-4%+17%29%24.9×10.1%+15.6%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology 688200.SSChina$6.87B-4%+44%36%50.0×47.7%+27.6%
Enpro NPOUnited States$5.47B-16%+16%16%23.2×26.1%+1.3%
Zhejiang Shuanghuan Driveline 002472.SZChina$5.46B+9%+15%15%26.9×11.0%+20.0%
Rotork ROR.LUnited Kingdom$5.40B+65%+2%24%27.9×27.6%+5.2%
Timken TKRUnited States$7.07B-14%+6%15%14.5×3.7%+5.5%
LandMark Optoelectronics 3081.TWOTaiwan$5.38B-32%+105%38%54.3×n/an/a
Shenzhen Envicool Technology 002837.SZChina$7.13B-49%+22%9%53.5×56.2%+29.0%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions ZWSUnited States$7.18B-15%+10%23%21.8×10.9%-2.4%
Spirax SPX.LUnited Kingdom$7.24B+2%+5%18%22.7×20.5%+7.4%

Questions

Who are Middleby's main competitors?
Named competitors: Illinois Tool Works (food equipment) (ITW), Ali Group (private or unlisted), Standex International (SXI), Hoshizaki (6465.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shanghai BOCHU Electronic Technology (688188.SS), Welspun (WELCORP.NS), Airtac International (1590.TW), MISUMI (9962.T), Valmet (VALMT.HE), INDO-MIM (INDOMIM.NS).
Is Middleby expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.5× against a peer median of 25.2×, 6th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Middleby stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +3.0% against -3.7% for the median peer; over one year +37.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.