Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9936.T Ohsho Food Service Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Ohsho Food Service Corp.9936.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants

Operates 'Gyoza no Ohsho', Japan's iconic Chinese-style dumpling (gyoza) restaurant chain.

≈ Japan's dumpling-focused Panda ExpressMomentum neutral 56
Mkt cap
$1.11B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
52%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.39M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
27.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.7 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
84 days
29 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥2,888
1D-4.2%
1W-0.2%
1M+1.1%
3M-1.2%
6M-1.4%
YTD-10.2%
1Y-17.0%
ATR %2.1%
52w lowhigh17.7% off high

What Ohsho Food Service does

Operates 'Gyoza no Ohsho', Japan's iconic Chinese-style dumpling (gyoza) restaurant chain.

Many of the restaurants are run by franchisees who buy their food supplies from the company's own plants, so Ohsho earns on selling ingredients and collecting fees as well as on its own restaurants' sales. Stores are built around cheap, quick meals and drinks.

In one line: Japan's dumpling-focused Panda Express.

Products and services

  • Gyoza no Ohsho restaurants

Customers

  • Value-conscious diners in Japan

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Restaurants
  • Chinese-style quick dining

What could go right

  • Value dining demand

What could go wrong

  • Food input cost inflation
  • Labor shortage

Moat: narrow (brand, cost advantage). Iconic gyoza brand with in-house central-kitchen supply keeping food costs low.

Headquarters: Kyoto, Japan · Founded: 1967 · Employees: 2,501

Named competitors

Ohsho Food Service at a glance

Size Ohsho Food Service (9936.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $1.11B, the 694th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,888 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.4%, against +22.0% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.5%); the operating margin is 7.1% (peer median 5.4%).

Valuation It trades at 27.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.6× (6th most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.7 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1229936.T 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Ohsho Food Service against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Ohsho Food Service financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥116B¥117B¥111B¥101B¥93.0B
Revenue growth—+5%+9%+9%—
Gross profitn/a¥76.3B¥73.4B¥67.6B¥61.8B
EBITDAn/a¥13.7B¥14.0B¥13.1B¥10.7B
Net income¥5.84B¥7.47B¥8.07B¥7.91B¥6.21B
Free cash flown/a¥6.35B¥7.04B¥8.73B¥4.12B
Capital expendituren/a¥4.36B¥4.18B¥3.48B¥3.21B
Total debtn/a¥3.00B¥5.00B¥7.00B¥9.00B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Ohsho Food Service competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%+60%-10%0%+10%WESTLIFE76300999BJRIDOM3087BH603043JDW81793543SG26958153CBRLARCOBLMNDMP309776169936.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Ohsho Food Service is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%0×100×200×300×WESTLIFE76300999BJRI3087603043354326958153CBRLBLMNDMP30979936.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Ohsho Food Service is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%WESTLIFE76300999BJRIDOM3087BHJDW8179354326958153ARCOBLMNDMP30979936.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Ohsho Food Service is the large dot.

Ohsho Food Service competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9936.T vs 3197.T vs 7611.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Ohsho Food Service 9936.T$1.11B-1%0%7%27.5×4.2%
Skylark 3197.T$5.18B+19%+11%7%38.5×6.4%
Hiday Hidaka 7611.T$760M+11%+10%11%23.5×-3.3%

How Ohsho Food Service compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Ohsho Food Service against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9936.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.1%+8.2%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-1.4%+22.0%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.7%-8.0%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.1%+6.5%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin7.1%5.4%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E27.5×19.6×6th most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.2%9.5%8th least demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.7%+12.3%7th lowest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-3.5 pp+1.4 pp10th least demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.7 pp-0.5 pp8th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Ohsho Food Service 9936.TJapan$1.11B-1%0%7%27.5×4.2%+7.7%
Westlife Foodworld WESTLIFE.NSIndia$1.08B+31%+10%5%343.5×49.0%+21.7%
Ichibanya 7630.TJapan$1.06B+21%+8%6%57.3×12.2%+8.2%
Xiaocaiyuan International 0999.HKHong Kong$1.17B+16%+3%15%13.1×-9.6%+15.8%
BJ's Restaurants BJRIUnited States$1.18B+30%+4%3%22.5×26.8%+12.4%
Domino's Pizza DOM.LUnited Kingdom$1.19B+24%+6%15%13.1×9.5%+6.3%
Doutor Nichires 3087.TJapan$1.03B+33%+8%7%16.3×-4.7%+10.6%
Biglari BHUnited States$1.01B+5%+8%5%n/a22.1%-1.8%
Guangzhou Restaurant 603043.SSChina$1.31B0%+9%11%17.3×-3.5%+10.4%
J D Wetherspoon JDW.LUnited Kingdom$1.33B+69%+5%5%19.6×7.7%+23.7%
Royal 8179.TJapan$887M+5%+7%5%24.6×5.7%+14.4%
KOMEDA 3543.TJapan$859M-4%+13%17%19.2×-0.7%+14.7%
Sweetgreen SGUnited States$1.43B+72%-1%-18%n/an/an/a
Kura Sushi 2695.TJapan$848M-2%+4%1%48.1×21.5%+12.5%
Mos Food Services 8153.TJapan$845M+10%+6%5%30.3×2.2%+7.4%
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store CBRLUnited States$1.45B+106%-5%0%30.3×14.0%+3.3%
Arcos Dorados ARCOUnited States$1.45B-23%+11%6%9.1×-3.5%+18.7%
Bloomin' Brands BLMNUnited States$835M+23%-2%3%10.5×10.6%+4.5%
Domino's Pizza Enterprises DMP.AXAustralia$1.48B+48%-11%5%16.9×17.9%-1.4%
Monogatari 3097.TJapan$1.50B+43%+22%8%25.4×2.0%+18.8%
Colowide 7616.TJapan$1.51B+21%+16%4%n/a13.6%+12.3%

Questions

Who are Ohsho Food Service's main competitors?
Named competitors: Bamiyan (Skylark) (3197.T), Hiday Hidaka (7611.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Westlife Foodworld (WESTLIFE.NS), Ichibanya (7630.T), Xiaocaiyuan International (0999.HK), BJ's Restaurants (BJRI), Domino's Pizza (DOM.L), Doutor Nichires (3087.T).
Is Ohsho Food Service expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 27.5× against a peer median of 19.6×, 6th most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Ohsho Food Service stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.4% against +22.0% for the median peer; over one year -17.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.