Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › BH Biglari Holdings, Inc. Class BOpen in the cockpit ↗

Biglari Holdings, Inc. Class BBHCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants

Holding company controlled by Sardar Biglari, owning Steak n Shake and Western Sizzlin restaurants plus insurance and investments.

≈ A small, restaurant-anchored Berkshire Hathaway-style holding companyMomentum weak 37
Mkt cap
$1.01B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$34.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-4.5 pp
WACC 7.5%
Hurdle
+24 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · USD$322.43
1D-2.7%
1W-18.1%
1M-12.3%
3M-16.4%
6M+5.1%
YTD-3.0%
1Y-12.7%
ATR %5.8%
Beta0.97
52w lowhigh33.3% off high

What Biglari does

Holding company controlled by Sardar Biglari, owning Steak n Shake and Western Sizzlin restaurants plus insurance and investments.

Restaurants carry the business: Steak n Shake earns from burger sales at company-run units and, increasingly, from fees and royalties paid by franchisees. Insurance premiums and swings in the value of an investment portfolio add volatility. Sardar Biglari is chairman and chief executive and controls the company through its dual share-class structure.

In one line: A small, restaurant-anchored Berkshire Hathaway-style holding company.

Products and services

  • Steak n Shake restaurants
  • Western Sizzlin restaurants
  • First Guard insurance
  • Investment portfolio (incl. Cracker Barrel stake)

Customers

  • Steak n Shake/Western Sizzlin diners
  • Insurance policyholders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Diversified holding company
  • Restaurants, insurance and investments
  • Multi-business conglomerate

What could go right

  • Investment portfolio gains
  • Steak n Shake franchising model

What could go wrong

  • Concentrated, illiquid investment bets
  • Governance/minority-shareholder concerns

Moat: none. Diversified conglomerate with no unifying operating moat; results depend on capital-allocation decisions.

Headquarters: San Antonio, Texas, US · Founded: 1934 · Employees: 2,359

Named competitors

Biglari at a glance

Size Biglari (BH) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $1.01B, the 2237th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $322.43 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.1%, against +12.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.5%); the operating margin is 5.2% (peer median 5.8%).

Valuation It trades at 2.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.3× (3rd most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +24 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.5 points below its cost of capital (7.5% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 8.4% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026BH 130Peer median 113
Six months, rebased to 100: Biglari against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Biglari financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$406M$395M$362M$365M$368M
Revenue growth—+9%-1%-1%—
Gross profit$118M$109M$98.8M$116M$116M
EBITDA$62.0M$58.9M$63.0M$78.4M$82.2M
Net income-$29.7M-$37.5M-$3.76M$54.9M-$32.0M
Free cash flow$49.9M$76.6M$19.1M$49.6M$98.1M
Capital expenditure$34.0M$30.4M$30.6M$23.4M$29.7M
Total debt$358M$359M$150M$101M$119M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Biglari competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%+60%-10%0%+10%30877630WESTLIFE993681790999BJRIDOM354326958153BLMNFWRG2589603043JDWCKF76119887SGBH6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Biglari is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%+15%1×2×30877630WESTLIFE993681790999BJRIDOM354326958153BLMNFWRG258960304376119887SGBHRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Biglari is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%30877630WESTLIFE993681790999BJRIDOM354326952589JDWCKFBHGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Biglari is the large dot.

Biglari competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (BH vs BRK-B vs L vs SHAK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Biglari BH$1.01B+5%+8%5%2.5×22.1%
Berkshire Hathaway BRK-B$1.22T+20%+4%16%n/an/a
Loews L$22.2B+5%+3%12%n/an/a
Shake Shack SHAK$3.08B+2%+17%5%2.4×n/a

How Biglari compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Biglari against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBHPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.3%+9.0%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return+5.1%+12.9%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-33.3%-12.9%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.5%+6.5%10th highest of 21
Operating margin5.2%5.8%9th lowest of 21
EV / Sales2.5×1.3×3rd most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)22.1%4.2%3rd most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)-1.8%+12.4%lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+23.9 pp-7.0 pp2nd most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.5 pp+1.5 pp5th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA16.6×10.5×3rd most expensive of 18
Net debt / EBITDA0.2×2.0×7th least indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Biglari BHUnited States$1.01B+5%+8%5%2.5×22.1%-1.8%
Doutor Nichires 3087.TJapan$1.03B+33%+8%7%0.8×-4.7%+10.6%
Ichibanya 7630.TJapan$1.06B+21%+8%6%2.3×12.2%+8.2%
Westlife Foodworld WESTLIFE.NSIndia$1.08B+31%+10%5%4.3×49.0%+21.7%
Ohsho Food Service 9936.TJapan$1.11B-1%0%7%1.5×4.2%+7.7%
Royal 8179.TJapan$887M+5%+7%5%1.0×5.7%+14.4%
Xiaocaiyuan International 0999.HKHong Kong$1.17B+16%+3%15%1.4×-9.6%+15.8%
BJ's Restaurants BJRIUnited States$1.18B+30%+4%3%1.1×26.8%+12.4%
Domino's Pizza DOM.LUnited Kingdom$1.19B+24%+6%15%2.0×9.5%+6.3%
KOMEDA 3543.TJapan$859M-4%+13%17%2.8×-0.7%+14.7%
Kura Sushi 2695.TJapan$848M-2%+4%1%0.7×21.5%+12.5%
Mos Food Services 8153.TJapan$845M+10%+6%5%1.1×2.2%+7.4%
Bloomin' Brands BLMNUnited States$835M+23%-2%3%0.7×10.6%+4.5%
First Watch Restaurant FWRGUnited States$794M+6%+16%3%1.4×n/an/a
Auntea Jenny (Shanghai) Industrial 2589.HKHong Kong$784M-61%+36%15%0.7×-7.1%+23.7%
Guangzhou Restaurant 603043.SSChina$1.31B0%+9%11%1.6×-3.5%+10.4%
J D Wetherspoon JDW.LUnited Kingdom$1.33B+69%+5%5%0.9×7.7%+23.7%
Collins Foods CKF.AXAustralia$762M+15%+5%8%1.2×1.4%+8.4%
Hiday Hidaka 7611.TJapan$760M+11%+10%11%1.6×-3.3%+16.1%
Matsuya Foods 9887.TJapan$733M+7%+18%4%0.8×n/an/a
Sweetgreen SGUnited States$1.43B+72%-1%-18%2.4×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Biglari's main competitors?
Named competitors: Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B), Loews Corporation (L), Shake Shack (SHAK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Doutor Nichires (3087.T), Ichibanya (7630.T), Westlife Foodworld (WESTLIFE.NS), Ohsho Food Service (9936.T), Royal (8179.T), Xiaocaiyuan International (0999.HK).
Is Biglari expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.5× against a peer median of 1.3×, 3rd most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +24 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Biglari stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.1% against +12.9% for the median peer; over one year -12.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.