Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600326.SS Xizang Tianlu Co Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Xizang Tianlu Co Ltd. Class A600326.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Other Transportation

Tibet-based construction and building-materials company, also involved in regional infrastructure projects.

Momentum weak 23
Mkt cap
$1.24B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
72%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
26.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.4 pp
WACC 6.5%
Hurdle
+38 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
165 days
20 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥6.05
1D-1.8%
1W+5.0%
1M-7.3%
3M-13.6%
6M-35.4%
YTD-45.1%
1Y-50.1%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh53.2% off high

What Xizang Tianlu does

Tibet-based construction and building-materials company, also involved in regional infrastructure projects.

Products and services

  • Construction contracting
  • Cement/building materials

Customers

  • Government infrastructure projects in Tibet

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Construction/infrastructure
  • Building materials + construction…

What could go right

  • Tibet/regional infrastructure investment

What could go wrong

  • Project-based revenue volatility
  • Regional economic dependence

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence). Established, government-linked construction/materials supplier in geographically isolated Tibet.

Headquarters: Lhasa, Tibet, China · Employees: 1,836

Xizang Tianlu at a glance

Size Xizang Tianlu (600326.SS) is a China Industrials company (Other Transportation) with a market value of $1.24B, the 1921st largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥6.05 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 35.4%, against -3.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 7.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.3%); the operating margin is 0.1% (peer median 15.0%).

Valuation It trades at 26.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.8× (2nd most expensive of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -13%, so the hurdle is +38 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.4 points below its cost of capital (6.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 20 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 97600326.SS 64
Six months, rebased to 100: Xizang Tianlu against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Xizang Tianlu financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.22BCN¥3.53BCN¥3.12BCN¥4.08BCN¥3.83B
Revenue growth—+13%-23%+7%—
Gross profitCN¥723MCN¥482MCN¥441MCN¥317MCN¥105M
EBITDAn/aCN¥295MCN¥251MCN¥44.7M-CN¥157M
Net income-CN¥143M-CN¥56.8M-CN¥104M-CN¥532M-CN¥498M
Free cash flowCN¥29.4MCN¥297MCN¥371MCN¥65.5M-CN¥157M
Capital expenditureCN¥263MCN¥23.0MCN¥86.5MCN¥174MCN¥122M
Total debtCN¥2.96BCN¥3.26BCN¥4.11BCN¥5.04BCN¥5.20B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Xizang Tianlu competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-10%0%+10%9031SVI0007556000200152600611603128600033600368SHREEJISPG9003FGP00202330133926450694600897600326.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Xizang Tianlu is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%0×100×903160002001526031289003000828FGP0694600897S61600326.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Xizang Tianlu is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%SVI000755600020600611603128600033000828FGP00202330133926450694600897600326.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Xizang Tianlu is the large dot.

Xizang Tianlu competitors and peer comparison

How Xizang Tianlu compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Xizang Tianlu against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600326.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.3%-1.2%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-35.4%-3.4%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-53.2%-21.1%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-7.8%+7.3%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin0.1%15.0%4th lowest of 21
Forward P/E26.3×11.8×2nd most expensive of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)24.9%-3.0%3rd most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)-13.0%+7.0%lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+37.9 pp-9.8 ppmost demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.4 pp-1.1 pp3rd lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Xizang Tianlu 600326.SSChina$1.24B-35%-8%0%26.3×24.9%-13.0%
Nishi-Nippon Railroad 9031.TJapan$1.37B0%+10%7%9.0×n/an/a
StorageVault Canada SVI.TOCanada$1.09B-4%+9%23%n/a21.9%+16.6%
Shanxi Hi-speed 000755.SZChina$1.07B-3%+3%47%n/a-7.2%+8.4%
Henan Zhongyuan Expressway 600020.SSChina$1.43B+5%-11%20%9.4×5.9%+5.4%
Shenzhen International 0152.HKHong Kong$1.49B-35%+15%11%6.1×n/an/a
Dazhong Transportation (Group) 600611.SSChina$1.02B-12%-12%-9%n/a5.8%-3.3%
CTS International Logistics 603128.SSChina$1.02B-5%+15%3%15.0×-5.1%+5.0%
Fujian Expressway Development 600033.SSChina$1.51B+1%-3%47%n/a-16.1%+5.6%
Guangxi Wuzhou Communications 600368.SSChina$1.01B+8%-40%48%n/an/an/a
Shreeji Shipping Global SHREEJISPG.NSIndia$1.53B+111%+21%24%n/an/an/a
Sotetsu 9003.TJapan$1.55B-4%+9%13%10.1×n/an/a
Dongguan Development (Holdings) 000828.SZChina$1.57B-3%-4%39%10.7×0.7%+4.4%
FirstGroup FGP.LUnited Kingdom$1.60B+40%-6%5%11.4×-7.6%+1.9%
Sichuan Haite High-Tech 002023.SZChina$948M-31%+14%-28%n/a31.4%+10.4%
Jiangsu Tongxingbao Intelligent Transportation Tech 301339.SZChina$948M-17%+9%20%13.8×-4.9%+17.9%
Evergreen Aviation Technologies 2645.TWTaiwan$1.67B-8%+10%17%16.2×-1.0%+11.2%
Beijing Capital International Airport 0694.HKHong Kong$914M-21%+6%0%183.1×40.5%+8.7%
Xiamen International Airport 600897.SSChina$892M-12%+33%28%12.1×-16.5%+11.4%
Hamburger Hafen und Logistik HHFA.DEGermany$1.72B-2%+3%7%n/an/an/a
SBS Transit S61.SISingapore$866M-2%+2%4%19.0×-10.6%+4.3%

Questions

Which companies are Xizang Tianlu's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Nishi-Nippon Railroad (9031.T), StorageVault Canada (SVI.TO), Shanxi Hi-speed (000755.SZ), Henan Zhongyuan Expressway (600020.SS), Shenzhen International (0152.HK), Dazhong Transportation (Group) (600611.SS), CTS International Logistics (603128.SS), Fujian Expressway Development (600033.SS).
Is Xizang Tianlu expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 26.3× against a peer median of 11.8×, 2nd most expensive of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -13%, so the hurdle is +38 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Xizang Tianlu stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -35.4% against -3.4% for the median peer; over one year -50.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.