Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3162.TWO United Alloy-Tech Company LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

United Alloy-Tech Company Ltd3162.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Consumer Discretionary›Motor Vehicles
Momentum neutral 54
Mkt cap
$317M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$2.65M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.8 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$68.00
1D-4.6%
1W-5.0%
1M-21.8%
3M+7.8%
6M-18.1%
YTD+19.8%
1Y+25.8%
ATR %6.1%
52w lowhigh30.5% off high

What United Alloy-Tech does

Employees: 1,416

United Alloy-Tech at a glance

Size United Alloy-Tech (3162.TWO) is a Taiwan Consumer Discretionary company (Motor Vehicles) with a market value of $317M, the 630th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$68.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 18.1%, against -21.8% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 26.0% over the last twelve months (peer median -4.3%); the operating margin is 1.1% (peer median 1.3%).

Valuation It trades at 14.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.8× (3rd most expensive of 11).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.8 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 793162.TWO 76
Six months, rebased to 100: United Alloy-Tech against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

United Alloy-Tech financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$8.39BNT$7.70BNT$4.65BNT$3.59BNT$2.43B
Revenue growth—+65%+29%+48%—
Gross profitNT$924MNT$960MNT$557MNT$391MNT$281M
EBITDANT$610MNT$637MNT$361MNT$159M-NT$148M
Net incomeNT$97.6MNT$222MNT$70.3MNT$131M-NT$211M
Free cash flow-NT$940M-NT$399M-NT$432M-NT$770M-NT$3.13B
Capital expenditureNT$1.38BNT$1.41BNT$574MNT$902MNT$2.44B
Total debtNT$2.59BNT$2.75BNT$2.61BNT$1.75BNT$1.14B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

United Alloy-Tech competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%-20%-10%603787893700362015365306SANDHAR30099422275243600653000868000017AMLAOV300978MLR625899140025013162.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. United Alloy-Tech is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%10×15×20×15365306SANDHAR30099422275243AOVMLR625899143162.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. United Alloy-Tech is the large dot.

United Alloy-Tech competitors and peer comparison

How United Alloy-Tech compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

United Alloy-Tech against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3162.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-21.8%-12.1%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-18.1%-21.8%9th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-30.5%-44.3%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+26.0%-4.3%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin1.1%1.3%11th highest of 21
Forward P/E14.9×11.8×3rd most expensive of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.8 pp-3.6 pp10th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA20.3×7.3×most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA3.0×0.6×4th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
United Alloy-Tech 3162.TWOTaiwan$317M-18%+26%1%14.9×n/an/a
Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle 603787.SSChina$318M-23%-12%-3%n/an/an/a
Her Chee Industrial 8937.TWOTaiwan$314M-36%+333%-45%n/an/an/a
KG Mobility 003620.KSSouth Korea$311M-52%+25%1%n/an/an/a
Hota Industrial Manufacturing 1536.TWTaiwan$309M-35%-4%-12%23.6×23.8%-1.6%
KMC (Kuei Meng) International 5306.TWTaiwan$325M+6%-2%22%12.0×-8.8%-5.3%
Sandhar Technologies SANDHAR.NSIndia$305M-9%+27%5%13.5×n/an/a
Joy Kie 300994.SZChina$345M-29%-3%2%13.3×9.9%+8.0%
Yulon Nissan Motor 2227.TWTaiwan$379M-21%-24%-5%10.7×n/an/a
Eson Precision Ind 5243.TWTaiwan$382M-31%-11%10%11.3×-7.0%+4.1%
Liaoning Shenhua 600653.SSChina$450M-16%-42%-3%n/a35.7%-11.9%
Anhui Ankai Automobile 000868.SZChina$468M-26%-1%-4%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen China Bicycle Company (Holdings) 000017.SZChina$469M-1%-39%6%n/a31.4%+44.2%
Aston Martin Lagonda Global AML.LUnited Kingdom$474M-26%0%-12%n/an/an/a
Amotiv AOV.AXAustralia$476M-19%+3%16%6.5×-4.7%+13.0%
WINBO-Dongjian Automotive Technology 300978.SZChina$522M-24%-8%11%n/a2.2%+6.7%
Miller Industries MLRUnited States$526M-4%-21%3%16.4×4.0%+3.9%
Jiangsu Yueda Investment 600805.SSChina$559M-17%-4%0%n/an/an/a
Hirata 6258.TJapan$564M-14%+9%11%11.0×4.1%+7.8%
Merida Industry 9914.TWTaiwan$573M+9%-16%6%11.5×-4.9%-0.3%
Jilin Liyuan Precision Manufacturing 002501.SZChina$591M-25%-9%-55%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are United Alloy-Tech's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle (603787.SS), Her Chee Industrial (8937.TWO), KG Mobility (003620.KS), Hota Industrial Manufacturing (1536.TW), KMC (Kuei Meng) International (5306.TW), Sandhar Technologies (SANDHAR.NS), Joy Kie (300994.SZ), Yulon Nissan Motor (2227.TW).
Is United Alloy-Tech expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.9× against a peer median of 11.8×, 3rd most expensive of 11 in its peer set.
How has United Alloy-Tech stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -18.1% against -21.8% for the median peer; over one year +25.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.