Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 253450.KS Studio Dragon Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Studio Dragon Corp.253450.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Communication Services›Movies/Entertainment
Momentum strong 78
Mkt cap
$515M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
45%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.25M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.7 pp
WACC 5.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · KRW₩23,250
1D-3.9%
1W+2.4%
1M+12.3%
3M+1.8%
6M-33.3%
YTD-45.6%
1Y-47.0%
ATR %5.3%
52w lowhigh54.0% off high

What Studio Dragon does

Employees: 179

Studio Dragon at a glance

Size Studio Dragon (253450.KS) is a South Korea Communication Services company (Movies/Entertainment) with a market value of $515M, the 328th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩23,250 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 33.3%, against -1.5% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 24.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.9%); the operating margin is 8.7% (peer median 8.6%).

Valuation It trades at 19.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.7× (4th most expensive of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.7 points below its cost of capital (5.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 97253450.KS 67
Six months, rebased to 100: Studio Dragon against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Studio Dragon financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩583B₩531B₩550B₩753B₩698B
Revenue growth—-4%-27%+8%—
Gross profit₩75.1B₩54.6B₩65.5B₩85.6B₩97.8B
EBITDA₩184B₩165B₩182B₩241B₩219B
Net income₩31.3B₩10.3B₩33.5B₩30.1B₩50.6B
Free cash flow-₩68.5B-₩6.75B₩178B₩37.8B-₩70.0B
Capital expenditure₩2.16B₩1.04B₩2.28B₩3.65B₩7.23B
Total debt₩75.7B₩24.9B₩7.24B₩177B₩175B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Studio Dragon competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%002905LUCKTIV18961228700933300426RNKTWC002343600136STRZANGX5253WVIACGX603721300027253450.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Studio Dragon is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%10×20×30×40×18961228700933RNK0023435253WVIACGX300027253450.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Studio Dragon is the large dot.

Studio Dragon competitors and peer comparison

How Studio Dragon compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Studio Dragon against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure253450.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+12.3%+2.6%7th highest of 21
6-month return-33.3%-1.5%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-54.0%-24.7%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+24.2%+3.9%4th highest of 21
Operating margin8.7%8.6%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E19.9×13.7×4th most expensive of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.7 pp-2.2 pp8th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA3.9×8.9×3rd cheapest of 16
Net debt / EBITDA0.1×1.0×7th least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Studio Dragon 253450.KSSouth Korea$515M-33%+24%9%19.9×n/an/a
Guangzhou Jinyi Media 002905.SZChina$515M-11%-15%-14%n/a8.1%+14.3%
Lucky Strike Entertainment LUCKUnited States$518M-54%+4%13%n/an/an/a
Tivoli A/S TIV.CODenmark$536M-3%+6%10%n/a8.8%+23.0%
Maoyan Entertainment 1896.HKHong Kong$547M-38%-7%9%12.0×n/an/a
YG Entertainment 122870.KSSouth Korea$578M-22%+60%11%17.2×-5.7%+16.4%
Viva Goods 0933.HKHong Kong$578M-23%+4%4%9.1×2.5%+65.8%
Zhejiang Huazhi Digital Media 300426.SZChina$578M+30%-71%27%n/a33.6%-10.6%
Rank RNK.LUnited Kingdom$583M-3%+5%9%10.3×5.8%+20.4%
TWC Enterprises TWC.TOCanada$447M+4%-3%19%n/a-6.0%+12.0%
Ciwen Media 002343.SZChina$610M+38%-55%-35%39.0×32.0%-9.9%
Blue Ant Media BAMI.TOCanada$429M-1%+5%10%n/a12.7%-2.1%
Wuhan MC Culture & Sports 600136.SSChina$425M-22%-39%-4%n/a51.0%-6.4%
Starz Entertainment STRZUnited States$425M+25%-8%-5%n/an/an/a
CJ CGV 079160.KSSouth Korea$629M+5%+12%5%n/a8.2%+31.3%
Angel Studios ANGXUnited States$633M+1%+233%-30%n/an/an/a
COVER 5253.TJapan$633M+11%+4%14%13.6×11.4%+53.8%
Winvia Entertainment WVIA.LUnited Kingdom$417M+31%+100%10%13.7×7.6%+99.9%
Cineplex CGX.TOCanada$641M+26%-2%9%33.9×3.2%+25.2%
TVZone Media 603721.SSChina$412M-6%+6%3%n/an/an/a
Huayi Brothers Media 300027.SZChina$648M-14%-24%-125%20.0×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Studio Dragon's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Guangzhou Jinyi Media (002905.SZ), Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK), Tivoli A/S (TIV.CO), Maoyan Entertainment (1896.HK), YG Entertainment (122870.KS), Viva Goods (0933.HK), Zhejiang Huazhi Digital Media (300426.SZ), Rank (RNK.L).
Is Studio Dragon expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.9× against a peer median of 13.7×, 4th most expensive of 10 in its peer set.
How has Studio Dragon stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -33.3% against -1.5% for the median peer; over one year -47.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.