Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2258.TW Foxtron Vehicle Technologies Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Foxtron Vehicle Technologies Co., Ltd.2258.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services

Electric-vehicle joint venture between Foxconn and Yulon Motor, designing EVs on Foxconn's MIH open platform.

≈ Like Magna Steyr's contract EV manufacturingMomentum strong 67
Mkt cap
$1.50B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
11%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$362,946
20-day average traded
P/B
4.35×
price to book
ROE
-33.6%
delivered
Implied ROE
19.9%
what the price asks
Next earnings
11 days
17 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$28.30
1D-2.4%
1W-5.8%
1M-7.2%
3M-5.7%
6M+1.1%
YTD-34.3%
1Y-27.5%
ATR %3.1%
52w lowhigh36.0% off high

What Foxtron Vehicle Technologies does

Electric-vehicle joint venture between Foxconn and Yulon Motor, designing EVs on Foxconn's MIH open platform.

In one line: Like Magna Steyr's contract EV manufacturing.

Products and services

  • EV design (MIH platform)
  • Luxgen n7 and related EV models
  • Contract EV manufacturing

Customers

  • Yulon Motor / Luxgen brand
  • Potential global EV brand partners

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Automotive
  • Electric vehicles
  • EV design & manufacturing

What could go right

  • Foxconn's push into contract EV manufacturing

What could go wrong

  • EV brand execution risk
  • Competition from established automakers

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, scale). Foxconn's MIH open EV platform and scale aim to cut partners' EV development costs.

Headquarters: Taoyuan, Taiwan · Founded: 2021 · Employees: 1,085

Named competitors

Foxtron Vehicle Technologies at a glance

Size Foxtron Vehicle Technologies (2258.TW) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $1.50B, the 202nd largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$28.30 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 1.1%, against -7.7% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 50.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.5%); the operating margin is -131.8% (peer median 10.6%).

Valuation It trades at 4.35× book value against a peer median of 3.83× (9th most expensive of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 19.9%; Foxtron Vehicle Technologies delivers -33.6%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 17 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20262258.TW 100Peer median 92
Six months, rebased to 100: Foxtron Vehicle Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Foxtron Vehicle Technologies financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$3.51BNT$4.15BNT$8.52BNT$1.04BNT$296M
Revenue growth—-51%+716%+253%—
Gross profit-NT$356M-NT$30.4MNT$754M-NT$1.06B-NT$701M
EBITDA-NT$3.03B-NT$2.26B-NT$1.05B-NT$1.16B-NT$851M
Net income-NT$4.57B-NT$3.74B-NT$2.14B-NT$1.93B-NT$1.36B
Free cash flow-NT$5.05B-NT$3.35B-NT$3.73B-NT$1.21B-NT$827M
Capital expenditureNT$2.37BNT$2.07BNT$3.64BNT$1.79BNT$996M
Total debtNT$6.77BNT$450MNT$393MNT$224MNT$618,000

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Foxtron Vehicle Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-25%0%+25%AFRYCLVT600662301413MOL9917688202603406688800AWX0026079744ICFIDBG688128ECLERX688112CONCORDBIO3007256887572258.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Foxtron Vehicle Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-20%0%20%50×100×AFRYCLVT600662301413MOL99176882026034066888000026079744ICFI688128ECLERX688112CONCORDBIO3007256887572258.TWReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Foxtron Vehicle Technologies is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%50%100%0%50%100%AFRYCLVT600662301413MOL9917688202AWX0026079744ECLERXCONCORDBIO6887572258.TWROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Foxtron Vehicle Technologies is the large dot.

Foxtron Vehicle Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2258.TW vs 1211.HK vs MG.TO vs TSLA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Foxtron Vehicle Technologies 2258.TW$1.50B+1%-50%-34%4.35×19.9%
BYD 1211.HK$98.9B-26%0%14%2.32×17.8%
Magna International MG.TO$16.1B+4%0%7%1.38×16.4%
Tesla TSLA$1.42T-16%+8%4%15.86×170.2%
HyundaiMtr 005380.KS$47.5B-47%+1%8%0.64×7.9%

How Foxtron Vehicle Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Foxtron Vehicle Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2258.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.2%-8.2%10th highest of 21
6-month return+1.1%-7.7%8th highest of 21
Return on equity-33.6%9.6%lowest of 21
Price / book4.35×3.83×9th most expensive of 21
ROE the price implies19.9%24.0%8th least demanding of 21
ROE delivered-33.6%9.6%lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Foxtron Vehicle Technologies 2258.TWTaiwan$1.50B+1%-50%-34%4.35×19.9%-33.6%
AFRY AFRY.STSweden$1.50B+17%-4%7%1.11×8.9%6.7%
Clarivate CLVTUnited States$1.50B-16%-9%-7%0.33×5.9%-7.1%
Shanghai Foreign Service 600662.SSChina$1.49B-14%+1%13%1.83×13.3%13.3%
Shenzhen Ampron Technology 301413.SZChina$1.48B-7%+11%2%5.56×52.5%1.8%
Moltiply MOL.MIItaly$1.53B+6%+32%12%4.05×38.6%12.4%
Taiwan Secom 9917.TWTaiwan$1.47B-8%+3%25%3.90×10.4%24.8%
Shanghai Medicilon 688202.SSChina$1.47B+18%+42%-2%4.78×63.8%-2.2%
Yangzhou Tinfulong 603406.SSChina$1.53B-25%-4%10%2.20×14.4%10.4%
Suzhou Recodeal Interconnect System 688800.SSChina$1.47B-55%+5%9%3.75×53.7%8.8%
AEM AWX.SISingapore$1.55B-18%+15%9%3.69×20.2%8.8%
Offcn Education Technology 002607.SZChina$1.56B-36%-2%1%12.91×128.6%0.9%
MEITEC 9744.TJapan$1.57B+3%+2%26%5.65×21.9%25.8%
ICF International ICFIUnited States$1.43B+14%-8%9%1.36×8.6%8.6%
Derichebourg DBG.PAFrance$1.42B-24%-3%12%1.08×15.0%11.8%
China National Electric Apparatus Research Institute 688128.SSChina$1.42B-12%+8%16%2.57×20.0%16.4%
eClerx Services ECLERX.NSIndia$1.59B0%+22%26%5.04×63.1%26.2%
Siglent Technologies 688112.SSChina$1.41B-5%+30%11%5.65×55.9%11.5%
Concord Biotech CONCORDBIO.NSIndia$1.40B+2%+4%14%6.38×105.8%14.5%
PharmaBlock Sciences (Nanjing) 300725.SZChina$1.61B+16%+11%4%2.35×26.1%3.8%
Wintech Nano (Suzhou) 688757.SSChina$1.39B-18%+23%4%10.21×180.8%4.0%

Questions

Who are Foxtron Vehicle Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: BYD Company (1211.HK), Magna International (MG.TO), Tesla (TSLA), Hyundai Motor (005380.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes AFRY (AFRY.ST), Clarivate (CLVT), Shanghai Foreign Service (600662.SS), Shenzhen Ampron Technology (301413.SZ), Moltiply (MOL.MI), Taiwan Secom (9917.TW).
Is Foxtron Vehicle Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 4.35× against a peer median of 3.83×, 9th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 19.9%; Foxtron Vehicle Technologies delivers -33.6%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Foxtron Vehicle Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +1.1% against -7.7% for the median peer; over one year -27.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.