Loading…

Slcorp005850.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM

Korean Tier-1 auto-parts maker specializing in vehicle lighting (headlamps, taillamps) for Hyundai/Kia and other automakers.

Momentum strong 61
Mkt cap
$1.54B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
29%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.66M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
5.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+7.9 pp
WACC 7.1%
Hurdle
-36 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩47,050
1D-3.9%
1W-2.8%
1M-7.6%
3M-13.0%
6M-25.2%
YTD+14.4%
1Y+36.2%
ATR %4.7%
52w lowhigh40.8% off high

What Slcorp does

Korean Tier-1 auto-parts maker specializing in vehicle lighting (headlamps, taillamps) for Hyundai/Kia and other automakers.

Wins business platform by platform when Hyundai or Kia chooses a lighting supplier for a new model, then supplies it for the model's life. It runs plants near the automakers' overseas assembly sites, including the US and Mexico, so output follows their global vehicle production.

Products and services

  • Headlamps
  • Taillamps
  • LED lighting modules

Customers

  • Hyundai Motor Group
  • Kia
  • GM

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Auto parts
  • Automotive lighting
  • OEM Tier-1 supplier

What could go right

  • Hyundai/Kia global vehicle production
  • LED content growth per vehicle

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration in Hyundai/Kia
  • Auto production cyclicality

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, switching costs). Qualified lighting supplier on Hyundai/Kia platforms; re-sourcing lighting mid-cycle is costly.

Headquarters: Daegu, South Korea · Founded: 1954 · Employees: 4,881

Named competitors

Slcorp at a glance

Size Slcorp (005850.KS) is a South Korea Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $1.54B, the 163rd largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩47,050 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 25.2%, against -17.6% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.4%); the operating margin is 8.3% (peer median 4.8%).

Valuation It trades at 5.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.4× (cheapest of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -36 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.9 points above its cost of capital (7.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 81005850.KS 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Slcorp against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Slcorp financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩5.47T₩5.24T₩4.97T₩4.84T₩4.17T
Revenue growth—+5%+3%+16%—
Gross profit₩788B₩722B₩678B₩629B₩458B
EBITDA₩616B₩569B₩557B₩538B₩336B
Net income₩381B₩311B₩368B₩336B₩155B
Free cash flow₩356B₩320B₩235B₩271B₩11.6B
Capital expenditure₩227B₩201B₩253B₩167B₩165B
Total debt₩378B₩308B₩323B₩363B₩434B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Slcorp competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%THRM0179OPM6995007340CIEINDIASEDEMAC600480LUMAXTECH13166004580028963009266053331057300580MINDACORP005850.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Slcorp is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%0×50×100×THRM0179OPM6995SEDEMAC600480LUMAXTECH0028961319300926605333300580300100MINDACORP005850.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Slcorp is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%THRM0179OPM6995007340CIEINDIA600480LUMAXTECH13161057300580300100MINDACORP005850.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Slcorp is the large dot.

Slcorp competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (005850.KS vs 204320.KS vs 7276.T vs VARROC.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Slcorp 005850.KS$1.54B-25%+10%8%5.7×-19.7%
Hl Mando 204320.KS$1.13B-43%+2%3%9.6×-19.9%
Koito Manufacturing 7276.T$4.27B-6%+6%6%13.3×-0.8%
Varroc Engineering VARROC.NS$1.28B+40%+22%6%31.5×29.9%

How Slcorp compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Slcorp against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure005850.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.6%-4.5%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-25.2%-17.6%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-40.8%-43.3%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.3%+7.4%10th highest of 21
Operating margin8.3%4.8%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E5.7×13.4×cheapest of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-19.7%-4.6%least demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+15.9%+8.9%5th highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-35.6 pp-12.6 pp2nd least demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.9 pp+0.3 pphighest of 21
EV / EBITDA2.4×6.2×3rd cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA-1.1×1.0×2nd least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Slcorp 005850.KSSouth Korea$1.54B-25%+10%8%5.7×-19.7%+15.9%
Gentherm THRMUnited States$1.55B-7%+9%5%9.8×21.7%+10.4%
Johnson Electric 0179.HKHong Kong$1.56B-53%0%8%10.8×-16.4%+3.1%
OPmobility OPM.PAFrance$1.51B-42%-3%4%8.2×-8.1%+7.6%
Tokai Rika 6995.TJapan$1.57B0%+5%5%9.9×-4.6%+7.9%
Dn Automotive 007340.KSSouth Korea$1.46B-20%+17%15%n/a-16.2%+35.6%
CIE Automotive India CIEINDIA.NSIndia$1.42B-26%+12%11%12.2×8.6%+9.2%
SEDEMAC Mechatronics SEDEMAC.NSIndia$1.42B+56%+61%15%73.8×n/an/a
Lingyun Industrial 600480.SSChina$1.41B-25%+3%5%17.1×-12.3%+8.0%
Lumax Auto Technologies LUMAXTECH.NSIndia$1.68B+36%+33%10%37.2×34.9%+34.5%
Nexteer Automotive 1316.HKHong Kong$1.40B-14%+6%4%8.5×-13.5%+8.7%
Zhuzhou Times New Materials Technology 600458.SSChina$1.39B-17%+1%2%14.7×n/an/a
Ningbo Zhongda Leader Intelligent Transmission 002896.SZChina$1.69B-18%+22%4%132.1×n/an/a
Tong Yang Industry 1319.TWTaiwan$1.35B-1%-12%15%10.9×-5.9%+7.7%
Jiangsu Bojun Industrial Technology 300926.SZChina$1.35B-31%+54%13%9.0×n/an/a
Gestamp Automocion GEST.MCSpain$1.77B-13%-3%5%7.3×-5.7%+8.8%
Kunshan Huguang Auto Harness 605333.SSChina$1.32B-16%-2%2%31.8×n/an/a
Zhejiang Shibao 1057.HKHong Kong$1.32B-33%+22%4%n/a26.8%+25.6%
Wuxi Best Precision Machinery 300580.SZChina$1.32B-40%+12%16%29.4×20.8%+10.1%
Shuanglin 300100.SZChina$1.80B-27%-11%4%32.6×25.5%+8.9%
Minda MINDACORP.NSIndia$1.80B+33%+33%8%37.6×32.0%+21.3%

Questions

Who are Slcorp's main competitors?
Named competitors: HL Mando (204320.KS), Koito Manufacturing (7276.T), Varroc Engineering (VARROC.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Gentherm (THRM), Johnson Electric (0179.HK), OPmobility (OPM.PA), Tokai Rika (6995.T), Dn Automotive (007340.KS), CIE Automotive India (CIEINDIA.NS).
Is Slcorp expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 5.7× against a peer median of 13.4×, cheapest of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -36 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Slcorp stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -25.2% against -17.6% for the median peer; over one year +36.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.