Loading…

Hl Mando204320.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM

Korean Tier-1 auto-parts maker of steering, braking and suspension systems, including ADAS-enabled systems, for global automakers.

≈ Korea's ZF/Continental-style chassis-systems supplierMomentum weak 22
Mkt cap
$1.13B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
68%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.49M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.0 pp
WACC 5.5%
Hurdle
-31 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · KRW₩32,600
1D-3.7%
1W-12.0%
1M-28.5%
3M-33.1%
6M-42.9%
YTD-43.6%
1Y-11.1%
ATR %6.7%
52w lowhigh58.8% off high

What Hl Mando does

Korean Tier-1 auto-parts maker of steering, braking and suspension systems, including ADAS-enabled systems, for global automakers.

Is paid per part under programmes awarded before a car model launches, so revenue follows its automaker customers' production, and Hyundai Motor Group is the largest customer. HL Group, the former Halla group, controls it. Chassis systems for EVs and driver-assistance carry more content per vehicle than conventional parts.

In one line: Korea's ZF/Continental-style chassis-systems supplier.

Products and services

  • Steering systems
  • Braking systems
  • Suspension/ADAS systems
  • EV chassis components

Customers

  • Hyundai Motor Group
  • Stellantis
  • Global OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Auto parts
  • Chassis systems…
  • ADAS-enabled hardware

What could go right

  • ADAS/EV chassis content growth
  • Non-Hyundai OEM diversification

What could go wrong

  • Auto production cyclicality
  • Customer concentration in Hyundai/Kia

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, switching costs, IP / patents). Deeply qualified chassis-systems supplier; steering/braking design cycles lock in suppliers for years.

Headquarters: Seongnam, South Korea · Founded: 1962 · Employees: 3,828

Named competitors

Hl Mando at a glance

Size Hl Mando (204320.KS) is a South Korea Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $1.13B, the 217th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩32,600 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 42.9%, against -12.7% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.8%); the operating margin is 3.5% (peer median 6.7%).

Valuation It trades at 9.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.2× (4th cheapest of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -31 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.0 points above its cost of capital (5.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 86204320.KS 56
Six months, rebased to 100: Hl Mando against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Hl Mando financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩9.59T₩9.45T₩8.85T₩8.39T₩7.52T
Revenue growth—+7%+5%+12%—
Gross profitn/a₩1.37T₩1.46T₩1.08T₩1.11T
EBITDAn/a₩716B₩694B₩601B₩587B
Net income₩82.9B₩100B₩130B₩136B₩98.3B
Free cash flown/a₩372B₩97.1B₩83.4B-₩278B
Capital expendituren/a₩390B₩380B₩414B₩385B
Total debtn/a₩2.33T₩2.37T₩2.36T₩2.27T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Hl Mando competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%SFQ001285JST72787242300473605319002516ARB301607DCH729600098000228460096059752025204320.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Hl Mando is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%10×20×30×SFQ001285JST72787242300473605319ARB301607DCH00243472960022846009605975204320.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Hl Mando is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%SFQJST7278300473605319002516ARB3016077296000980204320.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Hl Mando is the large dot.

Hl Mando competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (204320.KS vs CON.DE vs 1316.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Hl Mando 204320.KS$1.13B-43%+2%3%9.6×-19.9%
Continental CON.DE$15.8B+2%-35%n/a12.1×-0.2%
Nexteer Automotive 1316.HK$1.40B-14%+6%4%8.5×-13.5%

How Hl Mando compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Hl Mando against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure204320.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-28.5%-2.2%lowest of 21
6-month return-42.9%-12.7%lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-58.8%-30.5%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.9%+9.8%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin3.5%6.7%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E9.6×13.2×4th cheapest of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-19.9%0.9%least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.2%+12.0%7th lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-31.1 pp-11.1 ppleast demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.0 pp-0.5 pp4th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Hl Mando 204320.KSSouth Korea$1.13B-43%+2%3%9.6×-19.9%+11.2%
Saf-holland SFQ.DEGermany$1.11B+9%0%8%13.2×0.9%+12.6%
Guangzhou Ruili Kormee Automotive Electronic 001285.SZChina$1.14B-22%+21%14%17.4×n/an/a
JOST Werke JST.DEGermany$1.11B+5%+32%7%10.8×3.0%+14.1%
Exedy 7278.TJapan$1.14B-17%0%7%11.3×-6.9%+6.0%
KYB 7242.TJapan$1.15B+10%+11%6%9.6×-0.4%+8.0%
Fuxin Dare Automotive Parts 300473.SZChina$1.10B+28%+21%5%33.5×20.8%+10.0%
Wuxi Zhenhua Auto Parts 605319.SSChina$1.16B-18%+13%20%14.6×-4.7%+16.0%
Kuangda Technology 002516.SZChina$1.16B-13%+3%12%n/a9.3%+9.0%
ARB ARB.AXAustralia$1.08B+1%-4%16%17.0×15.7%+2.4%
Zhejiang EV-Tech 301607.SZChina$1.18B-7%+60%6%20.3×24.2%+35.3%
Dauch DCHUnited States$1.07B-32%+41%3%5.5×n/an/a
Zhejiang Wanliyang 002434.SZChina$1.19B-13%-30%-10%15.5×n/an/a
F.C.C.Co 7296.TJapan$1.20B+20%+10%8%9.0×-7.1%+12.3%
Sichuan Chengfei Integration Technology 002190.SZChina$1.20B-24%+9%-1%n/an/an/a
Zotye Automobile 000980.SZChina$1.05B-35%-33%-93%n/a37.5%-17.1%
Zhejiang Asia-Pacific Mechanical & Electronic 002284.SZChina$1.05B-29%+10%9%10.7×-1.8%+13.9%
Bohai Automotive Systems 600960.SSChina$1.04B-13%-26%-2%16.5×n/an/a
NASN Intelligent Tech (Zhejiang) 2261.HKHong Kong$1.21Bn/a+57%-12%n/an/an/a
Topre 5975.TJapan$1.04B+32%+5%8%7.6×-1.2%+12.0%
Ruifeng Power 2025.HKHong Kong$1.22B+29%+4%1%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Hl Mando's main competitors?
Named competitors: ZF Friedrichshafen (private or unlisted), Continental (CON.DE), Nexteer Automotive (1316.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Saf-holland (SFQ.DE), Guangzhou Ruili Kormee Automotive Electronic (001285.SZ), JOST Werke (JST.DE), Exedy (7278.T), KYB (7242.T), Fuxin Dare Automotive Parts (300473.SZ).
Is Hl Mando expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.6× against a peer median of 13.2×, 4th cheapest of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -31 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Hl Mando stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -42.9% against -12.7% for the median peer; over one year -11.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.