Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7278.T Exedy CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Exedy Corporation7278.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM

Maker of automotive clutches and torque converters, a key supplier for manual and hybrid transmissions.

≈ A specialized Japanese clutch-systems supplierMomentum weak 20
Mkt cap
$1.14B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
59%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$9.27M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.9 pp
WACC 6.7%
Hurdle
-13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
87 days
1 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥5,050
1D-3.1%
1W-7.2%
1M-12.2%
3M-13.8%
6M-17.4%
YTD-10.0%
1Y-4.9%
ATR %2.4%
52w lowhigh19.7% off high

What Exedy does

Maker of automotive clutches and torque converters, a key supplier for manual and hybrid transmissions.

Sells clutches and torque converters to carmakers under programmes tied to specific transmission designs, so volumes follow those vehicles' production, and also supplies replacement parts. Electric vehicles need neither part, so the shift toward them is the long-term pressure.

In one line: A specialized Japanese clutch-systems supplier.

Products and services

  • Automotive clutches
  • Torque converters
  • Motorcycle clutches

Customers

  • Global automakers and motorcycle makers (Honda, To

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Discretionary
  • Auto parts
  • Clutch & transmission components

What could go right

  • Global vehicle production growth

What could go wrong

  • Manual transmission decline as EVs grow
  • Automotive cyclicality

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, process know-how). Long-standing OEM design-in relationships in a specialized driveline-component niche.

Headquarters: Neyagawa, Japan · Founded: 1940 · Employees: 10,970

Named competitors

Exedy at a glance

Size Exedy (7278.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $1.14B, the 682nd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥5,050 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 17.4%, against -6.9% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.2%); the operating margin is 7.4% (peer median 6.3%).

Valuation It trades at 11.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.6× (6th cheapest of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.9 points above its cost of capital (6.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 927278.T 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Exedy against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Exedy financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥305B¥304B¥310B¥308B¥286B
Revenue growth—-2%0%+8%—
Gross profit¥64.8B¥60.9B¥57.7B¥51.7B¥42.6B
EBITDA¥36.5B¥37.4B¥37.3B¥35.7B¥31.8B
Net income¥12.2B¥13.7B¥12.7B-¥10.0B¥4.59B
Free cash flow¥31.8B¥33.4B¥23.9B¥28.7B¥15.3B
Capital expenditure¥8.15B¥8.35B¥8.04B¥9.48B¥12.4B
Total debt¥72.2B¥56.7B¥58.0B¥31.5B¥35.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Exedy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-25%0%+25%+50%0012857242605319002516204320SFQJST3016073004737296ARBDCH2025000678SKFINDUSJBMA0009807278.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Exedy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%10×20×30×0012857242605319204320SFQJST3016073004730024347296ARBDCH7278.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Exedy is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%7242605319002516204320JST3016073004737296ARB0009807278.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Exedy is the large dot.

Exedy competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (7278.T vs 7259.T vs 7296.T vs FR.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Exedy 7278.T$1.14B-17%0%7%11.3×-6.9%
Aisin 7259.T$9.78B-14%+6%4%10.0×-0.3%
F.C.C.Co 7296.T$1.20B+20%+10%8%9.0×-7.1%
Valeo FR.PA$3.00B-15%-2%4%7.3×-8.2%

How Exedy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Exedy against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7278.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.2%-2.5%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-17.4%-6.9%8th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-19.7%-30.6%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.2%+10.2%6th lowest of 20
Operating margin7.4%6.3%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.3×14.6×6th cheapest of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-6.9%6.2%3rd least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.0%+11.2%3rd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-12.9 pp-11.1 pp4th least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.9 pp-0.5 pp9th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA5.1×8.6×2nd cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-0.2×1.8×3rd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Exedy 7278.TJapan$1.14B-17%0%7%11.3×-6.9%+6.0%
Guangzhou Ruili Kormee Automotive Electronic 001285.SZChina$1.14B-22%+21%14%17.4×n/an/a
KYB 7242.TJapan$1.15B+10%+11%6%9.6×-0.4%+8.0%
Wuxi Zhenhua Auto Parts 605319.SSChina$1.16B-18%+13%20%14.6×-4.7%+16.0%
Kuangda Technology 002516.SZChina$1.16B-13%+3%12%n/a9.3%+9.0%
Hl Mando 204320.KSSouth Korea$1.13B-43%+2%3%9.6×-19.9%+11.2%
Saf-holland SFQ.DEGermany$1.11B+9%0%8%13.2×0.9%+12.6%
JOST Werke JST.DEGermany$1.11B+5%+32%7%10.8×3.0%+14.1%
Zhejiang EV-Tech 301607.SZChina$1.18B-7%+60%6%20.3×24.2%+35.3%
Fuxin Dare Automotive Parts 300473.SZChina$1.10B+28%+21%5%33.5×20.8%+10.0%
Zhejiang Wanliyang 002434.SZChina$1.19B-13%-30%-10%15.5×n/an/a
F.C.C.Co 7296.TJapan$1.20B+20%+10%8%9.0×-7.1%+12.3%
Sichuan Chengfei Integration Technology 002190.SZChina$1.20B-24%+9%-1%n/an/an/a
ARB ARB.AXAustralia$1.08B+1%-4%16%17.0×15.7%+2.4%
NASN Intelligent Tech (Zhejiang) 2261.HKHong Kong$1.21Bn/a+57%-12%n/an/an/a
Dauch DCHUnited States$1.07B-32%+41%3%5.5×n/an/a
Ruifeng Power 2025.HKHong Kong$1.22B+29%+4%1%n/an/an/a
Xiangyang Automobile Bearing 000678.SZChina$1.22B+53%-3%-3%n/an/an/a
SKF India (Industrial) SKFINDUS.NSIndia$1.23B+9%n/a11%33.3×36.9%n/a
JBM Auto JBMA.NSIndia$1.24B-21%+16%9%n/an/an/a
Zotye Automobile 000980.SZChina$1.05B-35%-33%-93%n/a37.5%-17.1%

Questions

Who are Exedy's main competitors?
Named competitors: Aisin Corporation (7259.T), F.C.C. Co (7296.T), Valeo (FR.PA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Guangzhou Ruili Kormee Automotive Electronic (001285.SZ), KYB (7242.T), Wuxi Zhenhua Auto Parts (605319.SS), Kuangda Technology (002516.SZ), Hl Mando (204320.KS), Saf-holland (SFQ.DE).
Is Exedy expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.3× against a peer median of 14.6×, 6th cheapest of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Exedy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -17.4% against -6.9% for the median peer; over one year -4.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.