Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002245.SZ Jiangsu Azure Corporation Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Jiangsu Azure Corporation Class A002245.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors

Makes cylindrical lithium battery cells and LED chips, and still runs a metal-materials distribution business.

Momentum laggard 5
Mkt cap
$2.82B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
83%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$167M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.5 pp
WACC 10.0%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
172 days
27 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥11.01
1D-3.5%
1W+5.4%
1M-32.7%
3M-30.2%
6M-21.1%
YTD-8.5%
1Y-9.1%
ATR %6.9%
52w lowhigh52.6% off high

What Jiangsu Azure does

Makes cylindrical lithium battery cells and LED chips, and still runs a metal-materials distribution business.

Earns most of its income from cylindrical lithium battery cells sold to makers of power tools, cleaning appliances and e-mobility products, with LED chips and an older metal-materials distribution business as the other lines. Formerly Aoyang Shunchang, it grew the battery side and plans a cell plant in Malaysia.

Products and services

  • Cylindrical lithium battery cells
  • LED chips
  • Metal-materials distribution

Customers

  • Power-tool makers
  • Cleaning-appliance makers
  • E-mobility and energy-storage makers
  • LED lighting and display buyers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Batteries and optoelectronics
  • Cylindrical lithium cells, LED chips…

What could go right

  • Planned Malaysia cylindrical-cell plant
  • Energy storage and backup-power battery demand

What could go wrong

  • Intense lithium-battery price competition
  • LED chip price cycles

Moat: narrow (scale, customer qualification). Battery cells need long customer approval; scale in cylindrical cells helps cost, but rivals are large.

Headquarters: Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu, China · Employees: 4,237

Named competitors

Jiangsu Azure at a glance

Size Jiangsu Azure (002245.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $2.82B, the 908th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥11.01 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 21.1%, against +0.1% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 27.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.9%); the operating margin is 12.2% (peer median 4.9%).

Valuation It trades at 14.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.1× (9th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.5 points above its cost of capital (10.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 27 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 101002245.SZ 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Jiangsu Azure against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Jiangsu Azure financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥9.84BCN¥8.09BCN¥6.75BCN¥5.20BCN¥6.27B
Revenue growth—+20%+30%-17%—
Gross profitCN¥2.43BCN¥1.56BCN¥1.15BCN¥611MCN¥939M
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.36BCN¥964MCN¥448MCN¥644M
Net incomeCN¥1.04BCN¥711MCN¥488MCN¥141MCN¥378M
Free cash flowCN¥279MCN¥637MCN¥422MCN¥250M-CN¥302M
Capital expenditureCN¥1.01BCN¥971MCN¥748MCN¥360MCN¥809M
Total debtCN¥4.01BCN¥2.46BCN¥2.46BCN¥2.75BCN¥2.98B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Jiangsu Azure competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%001386INCH80888012RUS08117564BUFAB3132BCCDNOWOEM-B8078DXPE688433600704GEI600825CURYRUI002245.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Jiangsu Azure is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%0×100×200×INCH8088RUS7564BUFAB3132DNOW688433GEI002245.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Jiangsu Azure is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%001386INCH80888012RUS08117564BUFABBCCOEM-BDXPE600704GEI600825CURY002245.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Jiangsu Azure is the large dot.

Jiangsu Azure competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002245.SZ vs 300014.SZ vs 373220.KS vs 006400.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Jiangsu Azure 002245.SZ$2.82B-21%+27%12%14.6×11.8%
EVE Energy 300014.SZ$17.0B-28%+51%6%15.5×n/a
LG Energy Solution 373220.KS$58.2B-27%+25%1%n/an/a
Samsung Sdi 006400.KS$26.8B-33%+21%0%45.9×n/a
Sanan Optoelectronics 600703.SS$6.87B-33%-22%-7%n/an/a

How Jiangsu Azure compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Jiangsu Azure against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002245.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-32.7%-5.0%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-21.1%+0.1%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-52.6%-20.7%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+27.2%+7.9%4th highest of 21
Operating margin12.2%4.9%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E14.6×13.1×9th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)11.8%4.5%4th most demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+13.8%+8.8%3rd highest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-1.9 pp-3.5 pp9th most demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.5 pp+0.6 pp11th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Jiangsu Azure 002245.SZChina$2.82B-21%+27%12%14.6×11.8%+13.8%
Marco Polo 001386.SZChina$2.80B-15%-12%21%n/a-7.2%-5.5%
Inchcape INCH.LUnited Kingdom$2.87B-21%+7%6%7.5×-6.0%+5.9%
IWATANI 8088.TJapan$2.73B-4%+5%5%7.6×4.3%+10.1%
Nagase & 8012.TJapan$2.96B-9%+8%5%10.9×3.5%+3.2%
Russel Metals RUS.TOCanada$2.98B+36%+18%5%14.4×8.7%+11.5%
Xinhua Winshare Publishing & Media 0811.HKHong Kong$2.60B-15%+1%7%6.6×-10.6%+4.7%
Workman 7564.TJapan$2.57B-31%+21%19%17.1×4.6%+8.7%
Bufab BUFAB.STSweden$2.55B+16%+8%13%29.2×18.7%+11.2%
Macnica 3132.TJapan$3.23B+8%+35%4%11.8×n/an/a
Boise Cascade BCCUnited States$2.44B-1%+1%3%24.1×7.7%+3.2%
DNOW DNOWUnited States$2.40B+2%+70%-3%23.6×9.8%+11.7%
OEM International OEM-B.STSweden$2.34B+11%+11%15%29.9×14.6%+10.1%
Hanwa 8078.TJapan$2.29B+7%+6%2%7.8×-4.2%+8.8%
DXP Enterprises DXPEUnited States$2.18B-10%+11%9%20.7×6.6%+14.9%
Farsoon Technologies 688433.SSChina$3.76B-24%+52%5%234.8×n/an/a
Wuchan Zhongda 600704.SSChina$3.86B0%+3%1%7.2×-2.5%+8.1%
Gibson Energy GEI.TOCanada$3.87B+13%+26%3%19.5×6.4%+16.7%
Shanghai Xinhua Media 600825.SSChina$2.03B+118%+1%-1%n/a44.5%+2.3%
Currys CURY.LUnited Kingdom$1.97B+16%+6%2%10.4×4.3%-2.2%
Rubis SCA RUI.PAFrance$4.10B0%+11%7%10.3×3.1%+10.9%

Questions

Who are Jiangsu Azure's main competitors?
Named competitors: EVE Energy (300014.SZ), LG Energy Solution (373220.KS), Samsung SDI (006400.KS), San'an Optoelectronics (600703.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Marco Polo (001386.SZ), Inchcape (INCH.L), IWATANI (8088.T), Nagase & (8012.T), Russel Metals (RUS.TO), Xinhua Winshare Publishing & Media (0811.HK).
Is Jiangsu Azure expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.6× against a peer median of 13.1×, 9th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Jiangsu Azure stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -21.1% against +0.1% for the median peer; over one year -9.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.