Loading…

DNOW Inc.DNOWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors

Distributes pipes, valves and fittings and other products to oil & gas, industrial and energy-transition customers.

Momentum weak 31
Mkt cap
$2.40B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$45.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-11.9 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
104 days
18 Feb 2027
Close · USD$13.27
1D-3.3%
1W-18.6%
1M-15.2%
3M-20.3%
6M+1.5%
YTD+0.1%
1Y-8.9%
ATR %5.3%
Beta0.77
52w lowhigh23.1% off high

What DNOW does

Distributes pipes, valves and fittings and other products to oil & gas, industrial and energy-transition customers.

Buys pipe, valves and fittings from manufacturers and resells them through branches and on-site stores at a markup, so profit is the gap between buying and selling prices on high volume. Demand follows drilling, pipeline and plant activity. It was spun off from National Oilwell Varco in 2014.

Products and services

  • Pipes, valves & fittings
  • Process/production equipment
  • Energy-transition products (water, solar)

Customers

  • Oil & gas E&P and midstream companies
  • Industrial/manufacturing customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy/industrial distribution
  • Pipe, valve & fitting (PVF)…
  • Supply-chain/inventory management…

What could go right

  • Oil & gas drilling/completion activity
  • Diversification into industrial/energy-transition

What could go wrong

  • Oil & gas capex cyclicality
  • Commodity price swings

Moat: none (distribution). Distribution scale and branch network, but PVF distribution is competitive and largely commoditized.

Headquarters: Houston, Texas · Founded: 2014 · Employees: 5,300

Named competitors

DNOW at a glance

Size DNOW (DNOW) is a United States Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $2.40B, the 1683rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $13.27 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 1.5%, against +3.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 69.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.1%); the operating margin is -2.5% (peer median 5.9%).

Valuation It trades at 23.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.2× (6th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.9 points below its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 5.4% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012013011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 104DNOW 101
Six months, rebased to 100: DNOW against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

DNOW financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$4.08B$2.82B$2.37B$2.32B$2.14B
Revenue growth—+19%+2%+9%—
Gross profit$649M$478M$531M$535M$506M
EBITDA-$27.0M$35.0M$157M$174M$170M
Net income-$188M-$89.0M$78.0M$243M$126M
Free cash flow$136M$134M$289M$171M-$9.00M
Capital expenditure$28.0M$21.0M$9.00M$17.0M$9.00M
Total debt$631M$614M$67.0M$63.0M$49.0M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

DNOW competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%BCCOEM-B8078601811BUFAB7564DXPE8088001386002245600825INCHCURY80123048RUSDBI5857TPK600397DNOW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. DNOW is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-100%-50%0%+50%0×50×100×150×BCCOEM-B807880880022455857600397DNOWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. DNOW is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%BCCOEM-B8078601811DXPE001386600825DBI5857DNOWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. DNOW is the large dot.

DNOW competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (DNOW vs MRC.TO vs DXPE vs RUS.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
DNOW DNOW$2.40B+2%+70%-3%23.6×9.8%
Morguard MRC.TO$844M-6%-1%49%5.1×n/a
DXP Enterprises DXPE$2.18B-10%+11%9%20.7×6.6%
Russel Metals RUS.TO$2.98B+36%+18%5%14.4×8.7%
Ferguson Enterprises FERG$45.2B-3%+8%10%19.4×9.9%

How DNOW compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

DNOW against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureDNOWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.2%-5.0%4th lowest of 21
6-month return+1.5%+3.6%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-23.1%-20.7%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+69.8%+7.1%highest of 21
Operating margin-2.5%5.9%lowest of 20
Forward P/E23.6×15.2×6th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.8%4.6%5th most demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.7%+8.7%5th highest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-1.9 pp-2.9 pp9th most demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-11.9 pp+1.0 pplowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
DNOW DNOWUnited States$2.40B+2%+70%-3%23.6×9.8%+11.7%
Boise Cascade BCCUnited States$2.44B-1%+1%3%24.1×7.7%+3.2%
OEM International OEM-B.STSweden$2.34B+11%+11%15%29.9×14.6%+10.1%
Hanwa 8078.TJapan$2.29B+7%+6%2%7.8×-4.2%+8.8%
Xinhua Winshare Publishing & Media 601811.SSChina$2.52B+26%-4%7%15.2×-11.4%+5.4%
Bufab BUFAB.STSweden$2.55B+16%+8%13%29.2×18.7%+11.2%
Workman 7564.TJapan$2.57B-31%+21%19%17.1×4.6%+8.7%
DXP Enterprises DXPEUnited States$2.18B-10%+11%9%20.7×6.6%+14.9%
IWATANI 8088.TJapan$2.73B-4%+5%5%7.6×4.3%+10.1%
Marco Polo 001386.SZChina$2.80B-15%-12%21%n/a-7.2%-5.5%
Jiangsu Azure 002245.SZChina$2.82B-21%+27%12%14.6×11.8%+13.8%
Shanghai Xinhua Media 600825.SSChina$2.03B+118%+1%-1%n/a44.5%+2.3%
Inchcape INCH.LUnited Kingdom$2.87B-21%+7%6%7.5×-6.0%+5.9%
Currys CURY.LUnited Kingdom$1.97B+16%+6%2%10.4×4.3%-2.2%
Nagase & 8012.TJapan$2.96B-9%+8%5%10.9×3.5%+3.2%
BIC Cameras 3048.TJapan$1.94B+10%+7%4%15.2×-8.2%+4.5%
Russel Metals RUS.TOCanada$2.98B+36%+18%5%14.4×8.7%+11.5%
Dalrymple Bay Infrastructure DBI.AXAustralia$1.92B+6%+11%29%26.2×7.8%+104.8%
ARE 5857.TJapan$1.89B+1%+38%7%9.3×2.0%+29.4%
Travis Perkins TPK.LUnited Kingdom$1.86B+28%0%3%23.2×8.5%+4.3%
Jiangxi Tungsten Rare and Precious Equipment 600397.SSChina$1.86B-13%-92%n/a156.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are DNOW's main competitors?
Named competitors: MRC Global (MRC.TO), Wilson International (private or unlisted), DXP Enterprises (DXPE), Edgen Group (private or unlisted), Russel Metals (RUS.TO), Ferguson Enterprises (FERG). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Boise Cascade (BCC), OEM International (OEM-B.ST), Hanwa (8078.T), Xinhua Winshare Publishing & Media (601811.SS), Bufab (BUFAB.ST), Workman (7564.T).
Is DNOW expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.6× against a peer median of 15.2×, 6th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has DNOW stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +1.5% against +3.6% for the median peer; over one year -8.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.