Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 001386.SZ Marco Polo Holdings Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Marco Polo Holdings Co., Ltd. Class A001386.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors

Major Chinese ceramic tile manufacturer selling building materials under the Marco Polo brand.

≈ China's Mohawk Industries for tileMomentum strong 77
Mkt cap
$2.80B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.13M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+5.9 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · CNYCN¥15.76
1D-1.3%
1W+0.4%
1M+0.5%
3M+3.7%
6M-15.4%
YTD-30.7%
1Y-49.9%
ATR %3.3%
52w lowhigh49.0% off high

What Marco Polo does

Major Chinese ceramic tile manufacturer selling building materials under the Marco Polo brand.

Sells tiles through two routes: a large share goes to property developers on project contracts, and the rest through retail dealers and showrooms to home renovators. Developer sales bring credit risk when the property market is weak.

In one line: China's Mohawk Industries for tile.

Products and services

  • Ceramic floor/wall tiles
  • Porcelain slabs
  • Sanitaryware

Customers

  • Real estate developers
  • Home renovation retailers/distributors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Building materials
  • Ceramic tiles

What could go right

  • Home renovation/replacement demand

What could go wrong

  • Real estate downturn exposure
  • Developer receivables risk

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, scale). Well-known premium tile brand with a wide dealer/showroom network across China.

Headquarters: Foshan, Guangdong, China · Founded: 1998 · Employees: 5,316

Named competitors

Marco Polo at a glance

Size Marco Polo (001386.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $2.80B, the 913th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥15.76 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 15.4%, against +0.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 11.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.9%); the operating margin is 20.9% (peer median 4.8%).

Valuation It trades at 2.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 0.7× (5th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -6%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.9 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 101001386.SZ 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Marco Polo against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Marco Polo financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenuen/aCN¥6.42BCN¥7.27BCN¥8.86BCN¥8.61B
Revenue growth—-12%-18%+3%—
Gross profitn/aCN¥2.39BCN¥2.68BCN¥3.05BCN¥2.89B
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.73BCN¥1.98BCN¥1.95BCN¥2.19B
Net incomen/aCN¥1.21BCN¥1.33BCN¥1.35BCN¥1.51B
Free cash flown/aCN¥1.95BCN¥1.54BCN¥2.81BCN¥2.55B
Capital expendituren/aCN¥227MCN¥303MCN¥256MCN¥490M
Total debtCN¥2.14BCN¥1.63BCN¥2.12BCN¥2.11BCN¥2.49B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Marco Polo competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%002245INCH80888012RUS08117564BUFABBCC3132DNOWOEM-B8078DXPE688433600704GEI600825CURY3048001386.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Marco Polo is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×2.5×5×7.5×002245INCH80888012RUS08117564BUFABBCC3132DNOWOEM-BDXPE688433GEI600825001386.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Marco Polo is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%002245INCH80888012RUS08117564BUFABBCCOEM-BDXPE600704GEI600825CURY3048001386.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Marco Polo is the large dot.

Marco Polo competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (001386.SZ vs 003012.SZ vs MHK vs KAJARIACER.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Marco Polo 001386.SZ$2.80B-15%-12%21%2.4×-7.2%
Guangdong Dongpeng 003012.SZ$779M-24%-15%0%0.7×-3.8%
Mohawk Industries MHK$8.75B+45%+4%7%0.9×6.4%
Kajaria Ceramics KAJARIACER.NS$1.96B+7%+14%16%3.4×26.2%

How Marco Polo compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Marco Polo against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure001386.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.5%-5.4%5th highest of 21
6-month return-15.4%+0.7%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-49.0%-20.7%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-11.8%+7.9%lowest of 21
Operating margin20.9%4.8%highest of 21
EV / Sales2.4×0.7×5th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.2%5.5%3rd least demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)-5.5%+8.8%lowest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-1.6 pp-3.5 pp7th most demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.9 pp+0.8 pp4th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA9.0×8.9×6th cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-1.8×1.3×2nd least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Marco Polo 001386.SZChina$2.80B-15%-12%21%2.4×-7.2%-5.5%
Jiangsu Azure 002245.SZChina$2.82B-21%+27%12%2.2×11.8%+13.8%
Inchcape INCH.LUnited Kingdom$2.87B-21%+7%6%0.3×-6.0%+5.9%
IWATANI 8088.TJapan$2.73B-4%+5%5%0.7×4.3%+10.1%
Nagase & 8012.TJapan$2.96B-9%+8%5%0.6×3.5%+3.2%
Russel Metals RUS.TOCanada$2.98B+36%+18%5%0.8×8.7%+11.5%
Xinhua Winshare Publishing & Media 0811.HKHong Kong$2.60B-15%+1%7%0.9×-10.6%+4.7%
Workman 7564.TJapan$2.57B-31%+21%19%1.9×4.6%+8.7%
Bufab BUFAB.STSweden$2.55B+16%+8%13%3.3×18.7%+11.2%
Boise Cascade BCCUnited States$2.44B-1%+1%3%0.4×7.7%+3.2%
Macnica 3132.TJapan$3.23B+8%+35%4%0.4×n/an/a
DNOW DNOWUnited States$2.40B+2%+70%-3%0.7×9.8%+11.7%
OEM International OEM-B.STSweden$2.34B+11%+11%15%3.8×14.6%+10.1%
Hanwa 8078.TJapan$2.29B+7%+6%2%0.2×-4.2%+8.8%
DXP Enterprises DXPEUnited States$2.18B-10%+11%9%1.3×6.6%+14.9%
Farsoon Technologies 688433.SSChina$3.76B-24%+52%5%30.0×n/an/a
Wuchan Zhongda 600704.SSChina$3.86B0%+3%1%0.2×-2.5%+8.1%
Gibson Energy GEI.TOCanada$3.87B+13%+26%3%0.6×6.4%+16.7%
Shanghai Xinhua Media 600825.SSChina$2.03B+118%+1%-1%8.4×44.5%+2.3%
Currys CURY.LUnited Kingdom$1.97B+16%+6%2%0.2×4.3%-2.2%
BIC Cameras 3048.TJapan$1.94B+10%+7%4%0.3×-8.2%+4.5%

Questions

Who are Marco Polo's main competitors?
Named competitors: Guangdong Dongpeng Holdings (003012.SZ), Mohawk Industries (MHK), Kajaria Ceramics (KAJARIACER.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jiangsu Azure (002245.SZ), Inchcape (INCH.L), IWATANI (8088.T), Nagase & (8012.T), Russel Metals (RUS.TO), Xinhua Winshare Publishing & Media (0811.HK).
Is Marco Polo expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.4× against a peer median of 0.7×, 5th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -6%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Marco Polo stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -15.4% against +0.7% for the median peer; over one year -49.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.