Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 373220.KS LG Energy SolutionOpen in the cockpit ↗

LG Energy Solution373220.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Electrical Products

Korean maker of lithium-ion EV and energy-storage batteries, spun off from LG Chem, supplying global automakers.

≈ Korea's Panasonic Energy — a pure-play EV battery cell maker.Momentum strong 69
Mkt cap
$58.2B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
20%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$144M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-6.2 pp
WACC 6.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Official | Implied
BBB / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
77 days
22 Jan 2027
Close · KRW₩337,500
1D-2.5%
1W-6.1%
1M-13.7%
3M+2.7%
6M-26.7%
YTD-8.4%
1Y-31.8%
ATR %6.4%
52w lowhigh36.0% off high

What LG Energy Solution does

Korean maker of lithium-ion EV and energy-storage batteries, spun off from LG Chem, supplying global automakers.

Sells battery cells under multi-year supply agreements, with several North American plants run as joint ventures with carmakers, including GM and Stellantis, so factory use depends on partners' EV sales. It was split from LG Chem in 2020 and listed in 2022; LG Chem still owns most of the shares.

In one line: Korea's Panasonic Energy — a pure-play EV battery cell maker..

Products and services

  • EV battery cells (pouch/cylindrical)
  • Energy storage system batteries
  • Battery materials joint-venture stakes

Customers

  • General Motors
  • Hyundai/Kia
  • Stellantis
  • Tesla
  • Honda

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • EV supply chain
  • Battery cell manufacturing
  • Lithium-ion cells and packs for EVs and…

What could go right

  • EV adoption growth in US/Europe
  • New joint-venture plants with automakers

What could go wrong

  • EV demand slowdown / tariff uncertainty
  • Chinese LFP price competition

Moat: narrow (scale, customer qualification, switching costs). Long-term, qualified supply contracts with major automakers, though its cost curve still trails CATL.

Headquarters: Seoul, South Korea · Founded: 2020 · Employees: 12,922

Named competitors

LG Energy Solution at a glance

Size LG Energy Solution (373220.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $58.2B, the 4th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩337,500 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 26.7%, against -22.6% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 24.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.4%); the operating margin is 0.7% (peer median 13.5%).

Valuation It trades at 2.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.5× (10th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.2 points below its cost of capital (6.7% WACC).

Credit LG Energy Solution has 9 bonds outstanding ($4.80B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 115 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 22 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 77373220.KS 72
Six months, rebased to 100: LG Energy Solution against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

LG Energy Solution financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩29.9T₩23.7T₩25.6T₩33.7T₩25.6T
Revenue growth—-8%-24%+32%—
Gross profitn/a₩3.67T₩3.05T₩4.68T₩4.08T
EBITDAn/a₩3.39T₩2.14T₩4.45T₩3.06T
Net income-₩2.23T-₩1.07T-₩1.02T₩1.24T₩767B
Free cash flown/a-₩6.40T-₩7.29T-₩5.48T-₩6.80T
Capital expendituren/a₩11.0T₩12.5T₩10.0T₩6.30T
Total debtn/a₩22.5T₩15.4T₩10.9T₩8.11T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

LG Energy Solution competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-30%-20%-10%0%-40%-20%0%65037011AMEROK002594PRY5803VWS600406006400600183ETN300274HUBBSU601869300750300014373220.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. LG Energy Solution is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%2×4×6×65037011AMEROK002594PRY5803VWSENR600406006400600183ETN300274ABBNHUBBSU601869300750300014373220.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. LG Energy Solution is the large dot.

LG Energy Solution competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (373220.KS vs 300750.SZ vs 6752.T vs 006400.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
LG Energy Solution 373220.KS$58.2B-27%+25%1%2.6×n/a
Contemporary Amperex Technology 300750.SZ$179B-42%+51%14%2.0×1.6%
Panasonic 6752.T$44.5B-6%+4%8%1.0×9.8%
Samsung Sdi 006400.KS$26.8B-33%+21%0%2.3×n/a
SK Innovation 096770.KS$13.4B-25%+26%9%0.2×n/a
BYD 1211.HK$98.9B-26%0%4%1.0×n/a

How LG Energy Solution compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

LG Energy Solution against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure373220.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-13.7%-14.2%11th highest of 21
6-month return-26.7%-22.6%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-36.0%-34.0%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+24.7%+13.4%6th highest of 21
Operating margin0.7%13.5%2nd lowest of 21
EV / Sales2.6×2.5×10th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.2 pp+4.4 pp2nd lowest of 21
Bond spread115 bp72 bpwidest of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
LG Energy Solution 373220.KSSouth Korea$58.2B-27%+25%1%2.6×n/an/a
Mitsubishi Electric 6503.TJapan$59.9B-28%+12%10%1.4×13.2%+7.1%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries 7011.TJapan$62.1B-37%-3%10%1.8×9.0%+6.1%
Ametek AMEUnited States$52.4B-1%+14%27%7.2×18.5%+10.3%
Rockwell Automation ROKUnited States$41.7B-17%+11%14%5.0×27.2%+5.7%
BYD 002594.SZChina$96.6B-17%-4%4%1.0×n/an/a
Prysmian PRY.MIItaly$33.9B-35%+17%8%1.5×13.1%+14.4%
Fujikura 5803.TJapan$33.0B-50%+28%19%3.9×28.9%+12.9%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S VWS.CODenmark$31.0B+8%+10%7%1.4×0.5%+4.9%
Siemens Energy ENR.DEGermany$111B-33%+9%9%2.2×17.3%+7.3%
NARI Technology 600406.SSChina$28.6B-8%+12%13%2.6×2.5%+11.4%
Samsung Sdi 006400.KSSouth Korea$26.8B-33%+21%0%2.3×n/an/a
Shengyi Technology 600183.SSChina$25.7B-8%+56%22%4.4×20.5%+14.1%
Eaton ETNUnited States$133B-15%+20%19%4.8×19.1%+9.0%
Sungrow Power Supply 300274.SZChina$25.3B-40%-24%12%2.4×12.1%+35.8%
ABB ABBN.SWSwitzerland$147B-17%+1%18%4.2×4.3%+2.3%
Hubbell HUBBUnited States$22.7B-13%+16%21%4.2×10.5%+9.7%
Schneider Electric SU.PAFrance$151B-16%+7%18%3.6×18.0%+9.8%
Yangtze Optical Fibre & Cable Joint Stock 601869.SSChina$19.8B-32%+68%34%5.9×15.7%+11.6%
Contemporary Amperex Technology 300750.SZChina$179B-42%+51%14%2.0×1.6%+53.1%
EVE Energy 300014.SZChina$17.0B-28%+51%6%1.6×n/an/a

LG Energy Solution bonds and credit

LG Energy Solution has 9 bonds outstanding with $4.80B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 5.80%, a spread of 115 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are LG Energy Solution's main competitors?
Named competitors: CATL (300750.SZ), Panasonic Energy (6752.T), Samsung SDI (006400.KS), SK On (SK Innovation) (096770.KS), BYD (1211.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Mitsubishi Electric (6503.T), Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (7011.T), Ametek (AME), Rockwell Automation (ROK), BYD (002594.SZ), Prysmian (PRY.MI).
Is LG Energy Solution expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.6× against a peer median of 2.5×, 10th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has LG Energy Solution stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -26.7% against -22.6% for the median peer; over one year -31.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.