Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 006400.KS Samsung Sdi Co.,ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Samsung Sdi Co.,ltd.006400.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Electrical Products

Korean maker of EV and energy-storage batteries plus small-format batteries and electronic materials for semiconductors and displays.

≈ Korea's Panasonic Energy, with a materials-business tail.Momentum strong 70
Mkt cap
$26.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
73%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$290M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
45.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-9.0 pp
WACC 8.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
83 days
28 Jan 2027
Close · KRW₩468,000
1D-8.1%
1W-13.8%
1M-16.7%
3M+11.6%
6M-32.7%
YTD+73.7%
1Y+64.2%
ATR %8.7%
52w lowhigh35.3% off high

What Samsung Sdi does

Korean maker of EV and energy-storage batteries plus small-format batteries and electronic materials for semiconductors and displays.

Sells battery cells under multi-year supply contracts tied to specific car models, so revenue follows customers' production plans, with premium European makers a mainstay. It builds US capacity through joint ventures with Stellantis and General Motors in Indiana rather than alone. Samsung Electronics is its largest shareholder.

In one line: Korea's Panasonic Energy, with a materials-business tail..

Products and services

  • EV battery cells
  • Energy storage system batteries
  • Small-format batteries (IT/power tools)
  • Electronic materials (semiconductor/OLED)

Customers

  • BMW
  • Stellantis
  • Rivian
  • global electronics OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • EV supply chain
  • Battery cell manufacturing + electronic…
  • EV/ESS batteries, small cylindrical…

What could go right

  • Premium EV maker demand (BMW etc.)
  • Solid-state battery commercialization

What could go wrong

  • EV demand slowdown
  • High capex for new battery chemistries

Moat: narrow (scale, customer qualification, process know-how). Long-standing qualified supplier to premium automakers like BMW, plus materials tied to Samsung group demand.

Headquarters: Yongin, South Korea · Founded: 1970 · Employees: 12,826

Named competitors

Samsung Sdi at a glance

Size Samsung Sdi (006400.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $26.8B, the 14th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩468,000 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.7%, against -21.3% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.4%); the operating margin is -0.2% (peer median 12.5%).

Valuation It trades at 45.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.2× (4th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.0 points below its cost of capital (8.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 78006400.KS 66
Six months, rebased to 100: Samsung Sdi against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Samsung Sdi financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩15.9T₩13.3T₩16.6T₩21.4T₩20.1T
Revenue growth—-20%-23%+7%—
Gross profitn/a₩1.37T₩3.02T₩3.71T₩4.15T
EBITDAn/a₩378B₩2.21T₩3.25T₩3.27T
Net income₩332B-₩649B₩599B₩2.01T₩1.95T
Free cash flown/a-₩2.27T-₩6.41T-₩1.94T-₩168B
Capital expendituren/a₩3.13T₩6.36T₩4.06T₩2.81T
Total debtn/a₩11.1T₩11.7T₩5.80T₩5.22T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Samsung Sdi competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%600183300274600406VWSHUBB5803PRY601869ROK300014000408BHEL605117ABB600487600089AMESIEMENS1072CGPOWER006400.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Samsung Sdi is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%20×40×60×600183300274600406VWSHUBB5803601869ROK300014000408BHEL605117ABB600487600089SIEMENS1072CGPOWER006400.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Samsung Sdi is the large dot.

Samsung Sdi competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (006400.KS vs 373220.KS vs 300750.SZ vs 6752.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Samsung Sdi 006400.KS$26.8B-33%+21%0%45.9×n/a
LG Energy Solution 373220.KS$58.2B-27%+25%1%n/an/a
Contemporary Amperex Technology 300750.SZ$179B-42%+51%14%13.0×1.6%
Panasonic 6752.T$44.5B-6%+4%8%13.5×9.8%
SK Innovation 096770.KS$13.4B-25%+26%9%4.5×n/a

How Samsung Sdi compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Samsung Sdi against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure006400.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.7%-7.1%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-32.7%-21.3%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-35.3%-33.8%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.7%+16.4%10th highest of 21
Operating margin-0.2%12.5%lowest of 21
Forward P/E45.9×20.2×4th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.0 pp+3.6 pplowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Samsung Sdi 006400.KSSouth Korea$26.8B-33%+21%0%45.9×n/an/a
Shengyi Technology 600183.SSChina$25.7B-8%+56%22%20.3×20.5%+14.1%
Sungrow Power Supply 300274.SZChina$25.3B-40%-24%12%14.9×12.1%+35.8%
NARI Technology 600406.SSChina$28.6B-8%+12%13%21.7×2.5%+11.4%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S VWS.CODenmark$31.0B+8%+10%7%21.3×0.5%+4.9%
Hubbell HUBBUnited States$22.7B-13%+16%21%19.1×10.5%+9.7%
Fujikura 5803.TJapan$33.0B-50%+28%19%14.3×28.9%+12.9%
Prysmian PRY.MIItaly$33.9B-35%+17%8%20.2×13.1%+14.4%
Yangtze Optical Fibre & Cable Joint Stock 601869.SSChina$19.8B-32%+68%34%23.8×15.7%+11.6%
Rockwell Automation ROKUnited States$41.7B-17%+11%14%25.0×27.2%+5.7%
EVE Energy 300014.SZChina$17.0B-28%+51%6%15.5×n/an/a
Zangge Mining 000408.SZChina$15.5B-26%+35%51%12.5×22.0%+13.4%
Bharat Heavy Electricals BHEL.NSIndia$15.4B+3%+29%9%41.2×44.1%+14.6%
Ningbo Deye Technology 605117.SSChina$15.3B-26%+71%27%17.3×7.9%+32.1%
ABB India ABB.NSIndia$15.2B-6%+8%13%85.7×47.3%+17.8%
Hengtong Optic-Electric 600487.SSChina$14.9B-38%+21%9%11.8×n/an/a
TBEA 600089.SSChina$14.2B-29%+12%6%15.2×n/an/a
Ametek AMEUnited States$52.4B-1%+14%27%24.8×18.5%+10.3%
Siemens SIEMENS.NSIndia$13.4B-8%-12%9%72.7×n/an/a
Dongfang Electric 1072.HKHong Kong$13.1B-56%+7%5%10.4×n/an/a
CG Power & Industrial Solutions CGPOWER.NSIndia$12.9B-10%+24%12%72.3×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Samsung Sdi's main competitors?
Named competitors: LG Energy Solution (373220.KS), CATL (300750.SZ), Panasonic Energy (6752.T), SK On (SK Innovation) (096770.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shengyi Technology (600183.SS), Sungrow Power Supply (300274.SZ), NARI Technology (600406.SS), Vestas Wind Systems A/S (VWS.CO), Hubbell (HUBB), Fujikura (5803.T).
Is Samsung Sdi expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 45.9× against a peer median of 20.2×, 4th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Samsung Sdi stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.7% against -21.3% for the median peer; over one year +64.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.