Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › UWMC UWM Holdings Corp. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

UWM Holdings Corp. Class AUWMCCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Financials›Finance/Rental/Leasing

Largest wholesale mortgage lender in the US, originating loans exclusively through independent mortgage brokers.

Momentum neutral 50
Mkt cap
$2.44B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
89%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$19.5M
20-day average traded
P/B
2.67×
price to book
ROE
2.1%
delivered
Implied ROE
32.8%
what the price asks
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · USD$1.52
1D-6.8%
1W-3.2%
1M+39.5%
3M+7.8%
6M-56.5%
YTD-65.3%
1Y-74.0%
ATR %9.4%
Beta1.30
52w lowhigh75.3% off high

What UWM does

Largest wholesale mortgage lender in the US, originating loans exclusively through independent mortgage brokers.

Makes money by originating loans through brokers and selling them into government-backed securities, taking fees and a gain on sale, and by keeping the right to service them for a fee. Volume rises and falls with mortgage rates. Mat Ishbia's SFS Corp controls it.

Products and services

  • Wholesale mortgage origination
  • Mortgage servicing

Customers

  • Independent mortgage brokers
  • Homebuyers/homeowners (via brokers)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Financials
  • Wholesale mortgage lending
  • Broker-channel loan origination

What could go right

  • Mortgage origination volume recovery (lower rates)
  • Broker channel share gains from retail lenders

What could go wrong

  • Interest-rate sensitivity of origination volume
  • Dual-class ownership/governance concerns

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, brand). Dominant broker-channel scale and technology platform give pricing/speed advantages brokers value.

Headquarters: Pontiac, Michigan, US · Founded: 1986 · Employees: 9,100

Named competitors

UWM at a glance

Size UWM (UWMC) is a United States Financials company (Finance/Rental/Leasing) with a market value of $2.44B, the 1670th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $1.52 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 56.5%, against -5.0% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.7%); the operating margin is 21.7% (peer median 30.8%).

Valuation It trades at 2.67× book value against a peer median of 1.75× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 32.8%; UWM delivers 2.1%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Short interest Short interest is 24.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

25507510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95UWMC 45
Six months, rebased to 100: UWM against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

UWM financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$2.87B$3.46B$2.46B$2.17B$2.09B
Revenue growth—+41%+14%+4%—
Gross profit$2.39B$3.05B$2.11B$1.88B$1.79B
EBITDA$680M$1.90B$1.17B$1.14B$1.03B
Net income$19.6M$27.4M$14.4M-$13.2M$41.7M
Free cash flown/a-$2.72B-$6.28B$139M$8.24B
Capital expendituren/a$74.0M$39.5M$26.4M$26.6M
Total debt$14.6B$14.4B$12.8B$8.73B$9.78B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

UWM competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%0%+20%CGCL8425ECPG84241606UPSTCTOSIIFLCHOLAHLDNGPNBHOUSINGMGRCHTGC8252SLMLICHSGFINAGMMANAPPURAMCREDITACCUWMC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. UWM is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

5%10%15%20%25%10×20×CGCL8425ECPG84241606UPSTCTOSIIFLCHOLAHLDNGAADHARHFCPNBHOUSINGMGRC8570HTGC8252SLMLICHSGFINAGMMANAPPURAMCREDITACCUWMCReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. UWM is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%10%20%30%40%0%20%40%CGCL8425ECPG84241606UPSTCTOSIIFLPNBHOUSINGMGRC8570HTGCSLMLICHSGFINCREDITACCUWMCROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. UWM is the large dot.

UWM competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (UWMC vs RKT vs PFSI vs LDI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
UWM UWMC$2.44B-56%+16%2%2.67×32.8%
Rocket Companies RKT$42.7B-4%+88%8%1.76×26.3%
PennyMac Financial Services PFSI$3.41B-28%+4%6%0.78×10.2%
loanDepot LDIn/a-54%n/an/an/an/a

How UWM compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

UWM against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureUWMCPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+39.5%-2.5%highest of 21
6-month return-56.5%-5.0%lowest of 21
Return on equity2.1%13.4%lowest of 21
Price / book2.67×1.75×2nd most expensive of 21
Trailing P/E187.7×11.6×most expensive of 21
ROE the price implies32.8%16.7%3rd most demanding of 21
ROE delivered2.1%13.3%lowest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
UWM UWMCUnited States$2.44B-56%+16%2%2.67×32.8%2.1%
Capri Global Capital CGCL.NSIndia$2.44B+20%+53%18%2.90×21.5%17.9%
Mizuho Leasing 8425.TJapan$2.45B-13%+16%13%0.77×6.0%13.3%
Encore Capital ECPGUnited States$2.42B+36%+29%31%2.24×21.7%30.5%
Fuyo General Lease 8424.TJapan$2.34B-6%+19%5%0.72×4.8%4.5%
China Development Bank Financial Leasing 1606.HKHong Kong$2.66B+4%-5%13%0.40×4.5%12.6%
Upstart UPSTUnited States$2.17B-24%+39%8%2.44×37.8%8.0%
Custom Truck One Source CTOSUnited States$2.12B-4%+6%4%2.58×26.7%3.7%
IIFL Finance IIFL.NSIndia$2.83B+35%+36%18%1.73×23.7%17.6%
Cholamandalam Financial CHOLAHLDNG.NSIndia$2.89B-17%+18%17%1.77×26.2%n/a
Aadhar Housing Finance AADHARHFC.NSIndia$1.99B-14%+18%16%2.48×31.1%n/a
PNB Housing Finance PNBHOUSING.NSIndia$3.03B+5%+11%12%1.42×19.4%12.3%
McGrath RentCorp MGRCUnited States$3.05B+9%+2%13%2.38×13.2%12.9%
AEON Financial Service 8570.TJapan$1.95B-9%+8%5%0.67×5.2%4.9%
Hercules Capital HTGCUnited States$3.06B0%+40%16%1.32×10.4%15.7%
Marui 8252.TJapan$3.09B-7%+8%12%2.12×7.1%12.4%
SLM SLMUnited States$3.10B-25%-6%25%1.55×13.8%24.7%
LIC Housing Finance LICHSGFIN.NSIndia$3.12B-9%-1%14%0.67×11.6%14.3%
Federal Agricultural Mortgage AGMUnited States$1.90B0%+31%13%1.56×14.0%13.5%
Manappuram Finance MANAPPURAM.NSIndia$3.23B+3%+5%7%1.90×33.0%n/a
CreditAccess Grameen CREDITACC.NSIndia$1.84B-27%+17%20%1.95×20.5%19.7%

Questions

Who are UWM's main competitors?
Named competitors: Rocket Companies (RKT), PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI), loanDepot (LDI), Guild Holdings (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Capri Global Capital (CGCL.NS), Mizuho Leasing (8425.T), Encore Capital (ECPG), Fuyo General Lease (8424.T), China Development Bank Financial Leasing (1606.HK), Upstart (UPST).
Is UWM expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 2.67× against a peer median of 1.75×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 32.8%; UWM delivers 2.1%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has UWM stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -56.5% against -5.0% for the median peer; over one year -74.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.