Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › TRI.TO Thomson Reuters CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Thomson Reuters CorporationTRI.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Industrials›Internet Software/Services

Global provider of legal, tax, accounting and news information and software, including the Reuters news agency.

≈ Canada's Bloomberg/RELX hybridMomentum leader 89
Mkt cap
$49.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
29%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$99.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.8 pp
WACC 5.1%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · CADC$158.85
1D-3.9%
1W-3.9%
1M+12.1%
3M+11.8%
6M+24.8%
YTD-12.3%
1Y-21.9%
ATR %4.5%
52w lowhigh21.7% off high

What Thomson Reuters does

Global provider of legal, tax, accounting and news information and software, including the Reuters news agency.

Earns recurring subscription revenue from legal, tax and accounting customers, with Reuters news as a smaller, separate business. It sold the majority of its financial-data arm, now part of LSEG, to Blackstone in 2018 to become a legal, tax and news company. Woodbridge, the Thomson family's holding company, controls it.

In one line: Canada's Bloomberg/RELX hybrid.

Products and services

  • Legal research/software (Westlaw, Practical Law)
  • Tax & accounting software
  • Reuters news agency
  • Risk/compliance solutions

Customers

  • Law firms/corporate legal departments
  • Accounting firms/tax professionals
  • Media outlets (Reuters content licensing)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information services
  • Professional information & software
  • Legal (Westlaw) + tax/accounting + news…

What could go right

  • AI-powered product upsell to existing customers
  • Subscription/software revenue growth

What could go wrong

  • Legal/professional services spending cyclicality
  • AI disruption risk to traditional research products

Moat: wide (switching costs, scale, brand). Deeply embedded legal/tax research and workflow software with proprietary content that is costly to switch away from.

Headquarters: Toronto, Canada · Founded: 2008 · Employees: 27,100

Named competitors

Thomson Reuters at a glance

Size Thomson Reuters (TRI.TO) is a Canada Industrials company (Internet Software/Services) with a market value of $49.1B, the 26th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$158.85 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 24.8%, against +10.0% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.7%); the operating margin is 26.2% (peer median 17.9%).

Valuation It trades at 24.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.1× (2nd most expensive of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.8 points above its cost of capital (5.1% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $18.8B at 31 Dec 2025, up 4% on a year earlier — 2.5 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026TRI.TO 125Peer median 110
Six months, rebased to 100: Thomson Reuters against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Thomson Reuters financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$10.9BC$10.4BC$9.94BC$9.17BC$8.63B
Revenue growth—+5%+8%+6%—
Gross profitC$2.86BC$2.78BC$2.67BC$2.61BC$2.31B
EBITDAC$4.23BC$4.25BC$3.79BC$3.59BC$3.25B
Net incomeC$2.19BC$2.10BC$3.03BC$3.64BC$1.74B
Free cash flowC$2.93BC$2.82BC$2.53BC$2.43BC$1.77B
Capital expenditureC$924MC$886MC$832MC$734MC$775M
Total debtC$5.41BC$3.25BC$4.42BC$4.67BC$6.77B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Thomson Reuters competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+5%+10%+15%+20%WCNCNRCPBBD-BWSPRBATRI.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Thomson Reuters is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+6%+8%+10%15×20×25×30×WCNCNRCPBBD-BWSPRBATRI.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Thomson Reuters is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%10%20%30%WCNCNRCPBBD-BWSPRBATRI.TOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Thomson Reuters is the large dot.

Thomson Reuters competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (TRI.TO vs REL.L vs WKL.AS vs INTU)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Thomson Reuters TRI.TO$49.1B+25%+6%26%24.8×2.7%
Relx REL.L$70.4B+23%+2%32%21.3×1.8%
Wolters Kluwer WKL.AS$22.0B+54%0%26%15.9×-3.0%
Intuit INTU$91.3B-14%+14%29%14.8×3.1%
Intapp INTA$3.35B+76%+14%-4%25.7×4.3%

How Thomson Reuters compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Thomson Reuters against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTRI.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+12.1%+10.4%3rd highest of 7
6-month return+24.8%+10.0%2nd highest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-21.7%-10.8%2nd lowest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.9%+7.7%2nd lowest of 7
Operating margin26.2%17.9%3rd highest of 7
Forward P/E24.8×21.1×2nd most expensive of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.7%10.0%2nd least demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.4%+13.5%2nd lowest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.7 pp+0.6 pp3rd least demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.8 pp+2.3 pp2nd highest of 7
EV / EBITDA17.1×15.5×3rd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×2.8×least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Thomson Reuters TRI.TOCanada$49.1B+25%+6%26%24.8×2.7%+5.4%
Waste Connections WCN.TOCanada$47.6B+27%+6%18%31.6×10.7%+12.6%
Canadian National Railway CNR.TOCanada$75.0B+16%+7%38%20.0×9.4%+4.6%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City CP.TOCanada$80.6B+12%+7%37%23.0×17.4%+14.4%
Bombardier BBD-B.TOCanada$22.5B+8%+11%11%22.1×19.0%+8.9%
WSP Global WSP.TOCanada$17.5B-19%+10%10%14.4×0.0%+15.7%
RB Global RBA.TOCanada$17.4B-7%+9%18%19.9×6.9%+28.3%

Thomson Reuters backlog

Thomson Reuters reported $18.8B of remaining performance obligations at 31 Dec 2025, up 4% from a year earlier. That is 2.5 years of trailing revenue already under contract.

Questions

Who are Thomson Reuters's main competitors?
Named competitors: RELX Group (REL.L), Wolters Kluwer (WKL.AS), Intuit (INTU), Intapp (INTA). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Waste Connections (WCN.TO), Canadian National Railway (CNR.TO), Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP.TO), Bombardier (BBD-B.TO), WSP Global (WSP.TO), RB Global (RBA.TO).
Is Thomson Reuters expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.8× against a peer median of 21.1×, 2nd most expensive of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Thomson Reuters stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +24.8% against +10.0% for the median peer; over one year -21.9%.
What is Thomson Reuters's backlog?
Thomson Reuters's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $18.8B at 31 Dec 2025, +4% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.