Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CP.TO Canadian Pacific Kansas City LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Canadian Pacific Kansas City LimitedCP.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Industrials›Railroads

Only single-line railway connecting Canada, the US and Mexico, hauling bulk freight, intermodal containers and industrial goods.

≈ A Canadian-Mexican Union Pacific/BNSF peer.Momentum strong 76
Mkt cap
$80.6B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$119M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.6 pp
WACC 8.5%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
88 days
2 Feb 2027
Close · CADC$129.97
1D-1.1%
1W+3.7%
1M+9.1%
3M+1.8%
6M+11.8%
YTD+28.6%
1Y+30.9%
ATR %2.1%
52w lowhigh2.7% off high

What Canadian Pacific Kansas City does

Only single-line railway connecting Canada, the US and Mexico, hauling bulk freight, intermodal containers and industrial goods.

Earns freight charges per shipment, with grain, potash, coal and containers carrying volumes. It bought Kansas City Southern, completing the merger in 2023, which gave it a rail link into Mexico and made it the only railway running from Canada through the US to Mexico on one network.

In one line: A Canadian-Mexican Union Pacific/BNSF peer..

Products and services

  • Bulk commodities (grain, potash, coal)
  • Intermodal container freight
  • Merchandise/industrial freight
  • Automotive freight

Customers

  • Grain elevators/agribusiness
  • Industrial manufacturers
  • Intermodal/container shippers
  • Automakers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Transportation
  • Rail freight
  • Cross-border rail network

What could go right

  • Cross-border trade growth (Mexico nearshoring)
  • Grain/potash volume growth

What could go wrong

  • Rail regulatory/labor disruption risk
  • Trade policy/tariff risk on cross-border volumes

Moat: wide (scale, regulatory licence, installed base). Owns the only single-line rail network spanning Canada-US-Mexico; new competing track is essentially impossible.

Headquarters: Calgary, Canada · Founded: 1881 · Employees: 19,479

Named competitors

Canadian Pacific Kansas City at a glance

Size Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP.TO) is a Canada Industrials company (Railroads) with a market value of $80.6B, the 12th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$129.97 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 11.8%, against +10.1% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.4%); the operating margin is 36.8% (peer median 37.0%).

Valuation It trades at 23.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.3× (most expensive of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.6 points below its cost of capital (8.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10010511011511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CP.TO 110Peer median 110
Six months, rebased to 100: Canadian Pacific Kansas City against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Canadian Pacific Kansas City financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$16.0BC$15.1BC$14.5BC$12.6BC$8.81B
Revenue growth—+4%+16%+42%—
Gross profitC$6.28BC$6.08BC$5.64BC$4.80BC$3.52B
EBITDAC$7.97BC$7.70BC$7.20BC$6.07BC$4.24B
Net incomeC$3.86BC$4.14BC$3.72BC$3.93BC$3.52B
Free cash flowC$2.93BC$2.17BC$2.41BC$1.64BC$2.58B
Capital expenditureC$2.85BC$3.14BC$2.86BC$2.50BC$1.56B
Total debtC$25.8BC$23.6BC$23.0BC$22.8BC$19.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Canadian Pacific Kansas City competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

+5%+10%+15%0%+5%+10%+15%CNRNSCCSX601816UNP9020CP.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Canadian Pacific Kansas City is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+4%+6%+8%17.5×20×22.5×CNRNSCCSX601816UNP9020CP.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Canadian Pacific Kansas City is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+5%+10%+15%0%10%CNRNSCCSX601816UNPCP.TOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Canadian Pacific Kansas City is the large dot.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CP.TO vs CNR.TO vs UNP vs NSC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Canadian Pacific Kansas City CP.TO$80.6B+12%+7%37%23.0×17.4%
Canadian National Railway CNR.TO$75.0B+16%+7%38%20.0×9.4%
Union Pacific UNP$172B+10%+7%40%20.7×8.8%
Norfolk Southern NSC$71.9B+3%+6%33%22.6×16.6%

How Canadian Pacific Kansas City compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCP.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+9.1%+5.2%3rd highest of 7
6-month return+11.8%+10.1%3rd highest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-2.7%-8.1%2nd highest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.5%+6.4%4th highest of 7
Operating margin36.8%37.0%4th highest of 7
Forward P/E23.0×20.3×most expensive of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)17.4%9.4%most demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.4%+4.6%highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.0 pp+4.8 pp2nd least demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.6 pp+2.5 pplowest of 7
EV / EBITDA17.5×15.3×most expensive of 6
Net debt / EBITDA3.2×2.5×2nd most indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Canadian Pacific Kansas City CP.TOCanada$80.6B+12%+7%37%23.0×17.4%+14.4%
Canadian National Railway CNR.TOCanada$75.0B+16%+7%38%20.0×9.4%+4.6%
Norfolk Southern NSCUnited States$71.9B+3%+6%33%22.6×16.6%+4.5%
CSX CSXUnited States$90.5B+10%+6%36%21.5×13.6%+5.9%
Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway 601816.SSChina$39.3B+9%+3%44%18.7×-2.8%+11.3%
Union Pacific UNPUnited States$172B+10%+7%40%20.7×8.8%+4.6%
East Japan Railway 9020.TJapan$27.4B+13%+9%14%15.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Canadian Pacific Kansas City's main competitors?
Named competitors: Canadian National Railway (CNR.TO), Union Pacific (UNP), BNSF (Berkshire Hathaway) (private or unlisted), Norfolk Southern (NSC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Canadian National Railway (CNR.TO), Norfolk Southern (NSC), CSX (CSX), Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway (601816.SS), Union Pacific (UNP), East Japan Railway (9020.T).
Is Canadian Pacific Kansas City expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.0× against a peer median of 20.3×, most expensive of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Canadian Pacific Kansas City stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +11.8% against +10.1% for the median peer; over one year +30.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.