Loading…

SiriusPoint LtdSPNTCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Financials›Property/Casualty Insurance

Bermuda-based specialty insurer and reinsurer writing property, casualty and accident/health risks globally.

Momentum leader 80
Mkt cap
$3.06B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
87%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$21.8M
20-day average traded
P/B
1.34×
price to book
ROE
23.1%
delivered
Implied ROE
9.5%
what the price asks
Official | Implied
BBB / BB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$26.33
1D+0.2%
1W+1.7%
1M+5.2%
3M+16.1%
6M+12.3%
YTD+20.3%
1Y+35.6%
ATR %2.5%
Beta0.03
52w lowhigh2.9% off high

What SiriusPoint does

Bermuda-based specialty insurer and reinsurer writing property, casualty and accident/health risks globally.

Takes risk from insurers that pass it a share of their policies, and from specialty programs written through managing general agents, firms that source and price business on its behalf. Premiums are invested until claims are paid, so investment income matters too. It was formed in 2021 when Third Point Re combined with Sirius International.

Products and services

  • Reinsurance (property & casualty)
  • Specialty insurance programs (via MGAs)
  • Accident & health

Customers

  • Insurers/cedants (reinsurance)
  • MGA partners

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Specialty insurance & reinsurance
  • Global (re)insurance underwriting
  • MGA/program business distribution

What could go right

  • Hard reinsurance pricing cycle
  • Improved underwriting discipline/loss ratios

What could go wrong

  • Catastrophe-loss exposure
  • Past volatile underwriting results/ownership changes

Moat: none (scale). Reinsurance/specialty underwriting is largely commoditized and cyclical, with limited pricing power.

Headquarters: Hamilton, Bermuda · Founded: 2020 · Employees: 1,099

Named competitors

SiriusPoint at a glance

Size SiriusPoint (SPNT) is a United States Financials company (Property/Casualty Insurance) with a market value of $3.06B, the 1540th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $26.33 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 12.3%, against +18.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 22.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.5%); the operating margin is 21.0% (peer median 17.8%).

Valuation It trades at 1.34× book value against a peer median of 1.78× (5th cheapest of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 9.5%; SiriusPoint delivers 23.1%, so the price asks less than the business earns today.

Credit SiriusPoint has 1 bond outstanding ($400M), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BB at a weighted spread of 134 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 4.8% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 118SPNT 114
Six months, rebased to 100: SiriusPoint against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

SiriusPoint financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.25B$3.21B$2.60B$2.74B$2.11B
Revenue growth—+23%-5%+30%—
Net income$506M$460M$200M$355M-$387M
Free cash flow$242M$96.1M$64.9M$581M$286M
Capital expenditure$0$0$0$0$0
Total debt$701M$713M$1.15B$815M$826M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

SiriusPoint competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%+60%+80%0%+20%NMIH7164HCI001450PLMRPRCHLREPROTARXHMNMCYKMPRMTGSIGISAFTHGTY2850DFYSCRSPNT6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. SiriusPoint is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-400%-300%-200%-100%0%00×2.50×50×7.50×NMIH7164HCI001450PLMRPROTARXHGTYSPNTReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. SiriusPoint is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

-400%-300%-200%-100%0%-400%-200%0%NMIH7164ARXHGTYSPNTROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. SiriusPoint is the large dot.

SiriusPoint competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SPNT vs RNR vs EG vs ACGL)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
SiriusPoint SPNT$3.06B+12%+23%23%1.34×9.5%
RenaissanceRe RNR$14.0B+16%-21%13%1.34×7.5%
Everest EG$15.2B+18%-9%13%1.08×6.6%
Arch Capital ACGL$36.6B+14%-5%19%1.58×8.3%

How SiriusPoint compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

SiriusPoint against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSPNTPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+5.2%+7.7%9th lowest of 21
6-month return+12.3%+18.1%8th lowest of 21
Return on equity23.1%15.4%6th highest of 20
Price / book1.34×1.78×5th cheapest of 21
Trailing P/E6.4×11.9×3rd cheapest of 18
ROE the price implies9.5%9.6%11th least demanding of 21
ROE delivered23.1%17.1%6th highest of 19
Bond spread134 bp125 bp3rd widest of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
SiriusPoint SPNTUnited States$3.06B+12%+23%23%1.34×9.5%23.1%
NMI NMIHUnited States$2.94B0%+8%15%1.10×7.9%15.4%
Zenkoku Hosho 7164.TJapan$2.69B+1%+2%14%1.74×6.2%14.1%
HCI HCIUnited States$2.31B+22%+23%34%2.15×17.3%33.8%
Hyundai M&F INS 001450.KSSouth Korea$2.29B+38%-5%21%0.51×4.2%21.0%
Palomar PLMRUnited States$4.10B+37%+60%22%4.16×17.0%22.2%
Porch PRCHUnited States$2.26B+80%+20%n/a345.11×5,821.2%n/a
Lancashire LRE.LUnited Kingdom$2.24B+18%-2%22%1.49×12.7%21.8%
Protector Forsikring PROT.OLNorway$4.19B+4%+12%35%5.34×18.1%35.2%
Accelerant ARXUnited States$4.32B+19%+55%-380%6.01×23.2%-380.1%
Horace Mann Educators HMNUnited States$2.16B+20%+4%12%1.46×7.9%n/a
Mercury General MCYUnited States$4.58B-17%+5%26%1.63×13.7%25.5%
Kemper KMPRUnited States$1.97B+10%-4%-19%0.90×9.4%-19.3%
MGIC Investment MTGUnited States$5.87B+7%-2%14%1.18×8.9%13.9%
Selective Insurance SIGIUnited States$5.87B+17%+4%15%1.81×9.1%14.7%
Safety Insurance SAFTUnited States$1.53B+46%+7%8%1.75×8.9%7.8%
Hagerty HGTYUnited States$6.18B+79%+1%5%8.42×53.7%4.6%
Shinkong Insurance 2850.TWTaiwan$1.51B+21%+22%24%2.27×6.6%24.0%
Definity Financial DFY.TOCanada$6.47B+14%+35%12%2.13×7.6%11.7%
Scor SCR.PAFrance$6.96B+10%-4%19%1.44×9.8%18.8%
Universal Insurance UVEUnited States$1.29B+19%+6%41%2.00×13.1%40.8%

SiriusPoint bonds and credit

SiriusPoint has 1 bond outstanding with $400M face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BB. Weighted yield 5.88%, a spread of 134 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are SiriusPoint's main competitors?
Named competitors: RenaissanceRe Holdings (RNR), Everest Group (EG), Arch Capital Group (ACGL). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes NMI (NMIH), Zenkoku Hosho (7164.T), HCI (HCI), Hyundai M&F INS (001450.KS), Palomar (PLMR), Porch (PRCH).
Is SiriusPoint expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 1.34× against a peer median of 1.78×, 5th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 9.5%; SiriusPoint delivers 23.1%, so the price asks less than the business earns today.
How has SiriusPoint stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +12.3% against +18.1% for the median peer; over one year +35.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.