Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LRE.L Lancashire Holdings LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Lancashire Holdings LimitedLRE.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Financials›Property/Casualty Insurance

Bermuda-based specialty insurer underwriting property, energy, marine and aviation risks, including via Lloyd's of London.

≈ A Bermuda specialty (re)insurer, akin to a smaller RenaissanceReMomentum strong 79
Mkt cap
$2.24B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.89M
20-day average traded
P/B
1.49×
price to book
ROE
21.8%
delivered
Implied ROE
12.7%
what the price asks
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£686.00
1D-2.1%
1W-0.1%
1M+8.0%
3M+15.7%
6M+17.6%
YTD+7.0%
1Y+3.0%
ATR %2.5%
52w lowhigh3.9% off high

What Lancashire does

Bermuda-based specialty insurer underwriting property, energy, marine and aviation risks, including via Lloyd's of London.

Earns premiums less the claims it pays, plus investment returns on money held before claims fall due, so results swing with catastrophe losses. It writes more when prices rise and less when they fall, and returns spare capital to shareholders. Business arrives through brokers and is written from Bermuda and through Lloyd's syndicates.

In one line: A Bermuda specialty (re)insurer, akin to a smaller RenaissanceRe.

Products and services

  • Property & catastrophe reinsurance
  • Energy insurance
  • Marine & aviation insurance

Customers

  • Corporate & industrial clients (via brokers)
  • Reinsurance cedants

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Financials
  • Specialty insurance/reinsurance
  • Property, energy, marine, aviation…

What could go right

  • Hardening specialty insurance pricing cycle
  • Reinsurance rate strength

What could go wrong

  • Catastrophe loss exposure (hurricanes, etc.)
  • Insurance pricing-cycle softening

Moat: narrow (scale, brand, process know-how). Specialty underwriting expertise and Lloyd's market access in niche catastrophe-exposed lines.

Headquarters: Hamilton, Bermuda · Founded: 2005 · Employees: 447

Named competitors

Lancashire at a glance

Size Lancashire (LRE.L) is a United Kingdom Financials company (Property/Casualty Insurance) with a market value of $2.24B, the 153rd largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £686.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 17.6%, against +19.6% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.8%); the operating margin is 17.8% (peer median 21.1%).

Valuation It trades at 1.49× book value against a peer median of 1.82× (7th cheapest of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 12.7%; Lancashire delivers 21.8%, so the price asks less than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 120LRE.L 118
Six months, rebased to 100: Lancashire against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Lancashire financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£1.52B£1.54B£1.50B£1.31B£1.04B
Revenue growth—+3%+14%+26%—
Net income£243M£223M£251M£259M-£12.6M
Free cash flow£353M£346M£539M£409M£282M
Capital expenditure£53.6M£54.3M£14.6M£13.4M£8.93M
Total debtn/a£355M£375M£370M£390M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lancashire competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+25%+50%+75%-20%0%+20%PRCH001450HCIHMNKMPR7164NMIHSPNTSAFT2850PLMRUFCSPROTARXASICMCYHRTGHIPOLRE.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lancashire is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-400%-200%0%00×250×500×750×001450HCIKMPRPLMRARXOIGLRE.LReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Lancashire is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

-400%-300%-200%-100%0%-400%-200%0%001450HCIKMPRARXHIPOLRE.LROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Lancashire is the large dot.

Lancashire competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LRE.L vs RNR vs AXS vs BEZ.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Lancashire LRE.L$2.24B+18%-2%22%1.49×12.7%
RenaissanceRe RNR$14.0B+16%-21%13%1.34×7.5%
Axis Capital AXS$7.60B+7%+10%16%1.33×8.1%
Beazley BEZ.Ln/a+3%n/an/an/an/a

How Lancashire compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lancashire against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLRE.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+8.0%-0.1%6th highest of 21
6-month return+17.6%+19.6%8th lowest of 20
Return on equity21.8%21.0%10th highest of 20
Price / book1.49×1.82×7th cheapest of 21
Trailing P/E7.1×11.2×5th cheapest of 19
ROE the price implies12.7%9.5%10th most demanding of 20
ROE delivered21.8%21.0%9th highest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Lancashire LRE.LUnited Kingdom$2.24B+18%-2%22%1.49×12.7%21.8%
Porch PRCHUnited States$2.26B+80%+20%n/a345.11×5,821.2%n/a
Hyundai M&F INS 001450.KSSouth Korea$2.29B+38%-5%21%0.51×4.2%21.0%
HCI HCIUnited States$2.31B+22%+23%34%2.15×17.3%33.8%
Horace Mann Educators HMNUnited States$2.16B+20%+4%12%1.46×7.9%n/a
Kemper KMPRUnited States$1.97B+10%-4%-19%0.90×9.4%-19.3%
Zenkoku Hosho 7164.TJapan$2.69B+1%+2%14%1.74×6.2%14.1%
NMI NMIHUnited States$2.94B0%+8%15%1.10×7.9%15.4%
SiriusPoint SPNTUnited States$3.06B+12%+23%23%1.34×9.5%23.1%
Safety Insurance SAFTUnited States$1.53B+46%+7%8%1.75×8.9%7.8%
Shinkong Insurance 2850.TWTaiwan$1.51B+21%+22%24%2.27×6.6%24.0%
Universal Insurance UVEUnited States$1.29B+19%+6%41%2.00×13.1%40.8%
Palomar PLMRUnited States$4.10B+37%+60%22%4.16×17.0%22.2%
United Fire UFCSUnited States$1.23B-1%+11%15%1.31×9.0%14.9%
Protector Forsikring PROT.OLNorway$4.19B+4%+12%35%5.34×18.1%35.2%
Accelerant ARXUnited States$4.32B+19%+55%-380%6.01×23.2%-380.1%
Ategrity Specialty Insurance ASICUnited States$1.16B+23%+30%16%1.89×9.3%15.8%
Mercury General MCYUnited States$4.58B-17%+5%26%1.63×13.7%25.5%
Heritage Insurance HRTGUnited States$984M+48%+2%42%1.64×14.1%41.7%
Hippo HIPOUnited States$929M+28%+21%7%1.98×22.6%7.2%
Orion180 Insurance OIGUnited States$888Mn/a+38%77%73.37×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Lancashire's main competitors?
Named competitors: RenaissanceRe Holdings (RNR), Axis Capital Holdings (AXS), Beazley plc (BEZ.L). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Porch (PRCH), Hyundai M&F INS (001450.KS), HCI (HCI), Horace Mann Educators (HMN), Kemper (KMPR), Zenkoku Hosho (7164.T).
Is Lancashire expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 1.49× against a peer median of 1.82×, 7th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 12.7%; Lancashire delivers 21.8%, so the price asks less than the business earns today.
How has Lancashire stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +17.6% against +19.6% for the median peer; over one year +3.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.