Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SENSO.HE Sensofusion OyjOpen in the cockpit ↗

Sensofusion OyjSENSO.HECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Finland · EUR·Industrials›Aerospace & Defense
Mkt cap
$1.97B
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$2.91M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+105.7 pp
WACC 19.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · EUR€18.00
1D+2.6%
1W-7.2%
1Mn/a
3Mn/a
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %7.1%
52w lowhigh11.6% off high

What Sensofusion does

No business profile yet.

Sensofusion at a glance

Size Sensofusion (SENSO.HE) is a Finland Industrials company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $1.97B, the 26th largest of 65 Finland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €18.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth The operating margin is 63.5% (peer median 1.4%).

Valuation It trades at 47.9× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.7× (most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 105.7 points above its cost of capital (19.5% WACC).

Sensofusion financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025
Revenuen/a€35.1M
Revenue growth——
Gross profitn/a€26.8M
EBITDAn/a€22.7M
Net incomen/a€18.6M
Free cash flown/a€1.97M
Capital expendituren/a€1.42M
Total debtn/a€3.14M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sensofusion competitors and peer comparison

How Sensofusion compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sensofusion against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSENSO.HEPeer medianRank in peer set
Distance from 52-week high-11.6%-37.5%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin63.5%1.4%highest of 21
EV / Sales47.9×3.7×most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+105.7 pp-5.6 pphighest of 21
EV / EBITDA74.0×16.7×most expensive of 8
Net debt / EBITDA-3.1×0.7×3rd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Sensofusion SENSO.HEFinland$1.97Bn/an/a64%47.9×n/an/a
Ligeance Aerospace Technology 000697.SZChina$1.94B-9%+24%-10%5.7×n/an/a
Chemring CHG.LUnited Kingdom$1.92B+13%-4%13%3.1×n/an/a
Ducommun DCOUnited States$2.04B-1%+9%10%2.7×n/an/a
Bodycote BOY.LUnited Kingdom$2.09B+35%+2%15%2.4×22.6%+4.0%
Cirrus Aircraft 2507.HKHong Kong$1.85B+5%+14%13%0.9×-1.4%+18.3%
China Marine Information Electronics 600764.SSChina$1.82B-28%+9%-2%3.1×n/an/a
AECC Aero Science And Technology 600391.SSChina$2.13B+16%-15%4%4.7×29.7%+9.7%
Redwire RDWUnited States$1.80B-35%+63%-41%3.3×n/an/a
MTAR Technologies MTARTECH.NSIndia$1.77B-18%+108%20%12.5×48.5%+29.2%
Hunan Aerospace Huanyu Communication Technology 688523.SSChina$2.19B-45%-30%-8%39.9×n/an/a
Montana Aerospace AERO.SWSwitzerland$1.69B-2%-36%7%1.5×6.1%+6.3%
Applied Aerospace & Defense AADXUnited States$1.67Bn/a+35%-10%3.6×n/an/a
Astronics ATROUnited States$2.36B-13%+14%14%2.9×17.3%+11.4%
Exail Technologies EXA.PAFrance$2.37B+10%+24%-2%3.8×42.5%+26.0%
Intuitive Machines LUNRUnited States$2.40B-64%+117%-20%7.5×n/an/a
Avio AVIO.MIItaly$1.60B-2%+14%1%1.5×26.1%+10.6%
Aequs AEQUS.NSIndia$1.56B+8%+33%-7%10.3×n/an/a
Xi'an Triangle Defense 300775.SZChina$1.50B-39%-29%2%8.3×31.7%+21.0%
Aerospace CH UAV 002389.SZChina$2.64B-17%+3%0%6.0×n/an/a
Beijing Beimo High-tech Frictional Material 002985.SZChina$1.46B-17%+36%28%10.4×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Sensofusion's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Ligeance Aerospace Technology (000697.SZ), Chemring (CHG.L), Ducommun (DCO), Bodycote (BOY.L), Cirrus Aircraft (2507.HK), China Marine Information Electronics (600764.SS), AECC Aero Science And Technology (600391.SS), Redwire (RDW).
Is Sensofusion expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 47.9× against a peer median of 3.7×, most expensive of 21 in its peer set.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.