Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Intuitive Machines, Inc. Class ALUNRCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Aerospace & Defense

Space company building and operating lunar landers under NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program.

Momentum laggard 7
Mkt cap
$2.40B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
88%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$76.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-18.7 pp
WACC 13.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · USD$10.47
1D+21.5%
1W-1.9%
1M-23.6%
3M-33.6%
6M-63.9%
YTD-35.5%
1Y+0.3%
ATR %10.0%
Beta3.73
52w lowhigh77.6% off high

What Intuitive Machines does

Space company building and operating lunar landers under NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program.

Is paid by NASA in fixed-price instalments for each lander mission, so income depends on hitting mission milestones, and NASA remains nearly its only large customer. Its first two landings, in 2024 and 2025, both ended with the lander on its side, which shows how much rides on each flight.

Products and services

  • Nova-C lunar lander
  • Lunar data/communications services
  • Orbital services

Customers

  • NASA (CLPS contracts)
  • Commercial/government payload customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Space exploration
  • Lunar lander missions

What could go right

  • NASA Artemis/lunar exploration program funding

What could go wrong

  • Mission execution/landing failure risk
  • Government contract/funding timing risk

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, first-mover approval). One of few companies with a NASA-contracted, flight-proven lunar lander program.

Headquarters: Houston, Texas, US · Founded: 2013 · Employees: 525

Named competitors

Intuitive Machines at a glance

Size Intuitive Machines (LUNR) is a United States Industrials company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $2.40B, the 1686th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $10.47 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 63.9%, against -12.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 116.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.5%); the operating margin is -19.6% (peer median 0.7%).

Valuation It trades at 7.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.5× (6th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 18.7 points below its cost of capital (13.0% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $815M at 30 Jun 2026, up 550% on a year earlier — 1.7 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 22.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

5010015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 87LUNR 32
Six months, rebased to 100: Intuitive Machines against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Intuitive Machines financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$490M$210M$228M$79.6M$85.9M
Revenue growth—-8%+187%-7%—
Gross profit$49.9M$5.39M$910,000-$25.8M$9.36M
EBITDA-$37.5M-$43.1M-$36.8M-$27.6M$38.9M
Net income-$131M-$83.3M-$283M$61.8M$0
Free cash flow-$188M-$56.0M-$67.7M-$75.2M-$15.6M
Capital expenditure$61.5M$41.7M$10.1M$29.9M$16.4M
Total debt$430M$372M$37.4M$43.5M$34.9M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Intuitive Machines competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%EXAATRO688523002389600435600391300456BOYDCO000519000697CHG2507600764RDWMTARTECHLUNR6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Intuitive Machines is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×20×40×EXAATRO688523002389600435600391300456000519000697CHG2507RDW601606600967MTARTECHLUNRRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Intuitive Machines is the large dot.

Intuitive Machines competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LUNR vs FLY vs 9348.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Intuitive Machines LUNR$2.40B-64%+117%-20%7.5×n/a
Firefly Aerospace FLY$3.48B-48%+179%-116%10.1×n/a
ispace,inc 9348.T$311M-28%-56%-681%23.0×n/a

How Intuitive Machines compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Intuitive Machines against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLUNRPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-23.6%-2.3%4th lowest of 20
6-month return-63.9%-12.6%lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-77.6%-39.4%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+116.9%+3.5%highest of 20
Operating margin-19.6%0.7%3rd lowest of 21
EV / Sales7.5×3.5×6th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-18.7 pp-5.6 pp2nd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Intuitive Machines LUNRUnited States$2.40B-64%+117%-20%7.5×n/an/a
Exail Technologies EXA.PAFrance$2.37B+10%+24%-2%3.8×42.5%+26.0%
Astronics ATROUnited States$2.36B-13%+14%14%2.9×17.3%+11.4%
Hunan Aerospace Huanyu Communication Technology 688523.SSChina$2.19B-45%-30%-8%39.9×n/an/a
Aerospace CH UAV 002389.SZChina$2.64B-17%+3%0%6.0×n/an/a
North Navigation Control Technology 600435.SSChina$2.65B-19%-32%-5%5.7×17.1%+6.8%
AECC Aero Science And Technology 600391.SSChina$2.13B+16%-15%4%4.7×29.7%+9.7%
Sai MicroElectronics 300456.SZChina$2.75B-45%-59%-99%42.5×41.7%+1.5%
Bodycote BOY.LUnited Kingdom$2.09B+35%+2%15%2.4×22.6%+4.0%
Ducommun DCOUnited States$2.04B-1%+9%10%2.7×n/an/a
North Industries Group Red Arrow 000519.SZChina$2.88B-22%+100%1%1.5×23.0%+7.5%
Sensofusion SENSO.HEFinland$1.97Bn/an/a64%47.9×n/an/a
Ligeance Aerospace Technology 000697.SZChina$1.94B-9%+24%-10%5.7×n/an/a
Chemring CHG.LUnited Kingdom$1.92B+13%-4%13%3.1×n/an/a
Cirrus Aircraft 2507.HKHong Kong$1.85B+5%+14%13%0.9×-1.4%+18.3%
AviChina Industry & Technology 2357.HKHong Kong$3.11B-13%+2%5%0.9×n/an/a
China Marine Information Electronics 600764.SSChina$1.82B-28%+9%-2%3.1×n/an/a
Redwire RDWUnited States$1.80B-35%+63%-41%3.3×n/an/a
Anhui GreatWall Military Industry 601606.SSChina$3.20B-22%-10%-7%15.7×n/an/a
Inner Mongolia First Machinery 600967.SSChina$3.22B-10%-7%0%2.0×38.2%-5.4%
MTAR Technologies MTARTECH.NSIndia$1.77B-18%+108%20%12.5×48.5%+29.2%

Intuitive Machines backlog

Intuitive Machines reported $815M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Jun 2026, up 550% from a year earlier and up 3% from the previous quarter. That is 1.7 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.11.

Questions

Who are Intuitive Machines's main competitors?
Named competitors: Firefly Aerospace (FLY), Astrobotic Technology (private or unlisted), ispace (9348.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Exail Technologies (EXA.PA), Astronics (ATRO), Hunan Aerospace Huanyu Communication Technology (688523.SS), Aerospace CH UAV (002389.SZ), North Navigation Control Technology (600435.SS), AECC Aero Science And Technology (600391.SS).
Is Intuitive Machines expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 7.5× against a peer median of 3.5×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Intuitive Machines stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -63.9% against -12.6% for the median peer; over one year +0.3%.
What is Intuitive Machines's backlog?
Intuitive Machines's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $815M at 30 Jun 2026, +550% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.