Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › AADX Applied Aerospace & Defense, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Applied Aerospace & Defense, Inc.AADXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Aerospace & Defense

US aerospace & defense company; specific product line not confirmed.

Mkt cap
$1.67B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
26%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$25.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-9.9 pp
WACC 6.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · USD$9.67
1D+13.0%
1W-13.3%
1M-13.3%
3M-55.1%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %9.4%
52w lowhigh60.1% off high

What Applied Aerospace & Defense does

US aerospace & defense company; specific product line not confirmed.

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Aerospace & defense (inferred)

Moat: none

Headquarters: United States · Employees: 1,542

Applied Aerospace & Defense at a glance

Size Applied Aerospace & Defense (AADX) is a United States Industrials company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $1.67B, the 1917th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $9.67 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 35.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.6%); the operating margin is -10.2% (peer median 5.1%).

Valuation It trades at 23.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 27.1× (7th cheapest of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.9 points below its cost of capital (6.2% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $948M at 30 Jun 2026. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 3.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Applied Aerospace & Defense financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024
Revenue$576M$499M$400M
Revenue growth—+25%—
Gross profit$116M$113M$74.6M
EBITDA-$18.6M$98.3M$69.5M
Net income-$174M-$17.0M-$34.8M
Free cash flown/a-$46.4M-$10.2M
Capital expendituren/a$17.4M$14.9M
Total debt$432M$707M$646M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Applied Aerospace & Defense competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×100×200×AEROAVIOMTARTECH60076425073007750029852634CHG300065CDRE600391AADXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Applied Aerospace & Defense is the large dot.

Applied Aerospace & Defense competitors and peer comparison

How Applied Aerospace & Defense compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Applied Aerospace & Defense against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAADXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-13.3%-5.5%7th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-60.1%-35.8%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+35.2%+8.6%4th highest of 20
Operating margin-10.2%5.1%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E23.4×27.1×7th cheapest of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.9 pp-4.3 pp5th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Applied Aerospace & Defense AADXUnited States$1.67Bn/a+35%-10%23.4×n/an/a
Montana Aerospace AERO.SWSwitzerland$1.69B-2%-36%7%20.5×6.1%+6.3%
Avio AVIO.MIItaly$1.60B-2%+14%1%89.7×26.1%+10.6%
MTAR Technologies MTARTECH.NSIndia$1.77B-18%+108%20%64.7×48.5%+29.2%
Aequs AEQUS.NSIndia$1.56B+8%+33%-7%n/an/an/a
Redwire RDWUnited States$1.80B-35%+63%-41%n/an/an/a
China Marine Information Electronics 600764.SSChina$1.82B-28%+9%-2%85.3×n/an/a
Cirrus Aircraft 2507.HKHong Kong$1.85B+5%+14%13%10.6×-1.4%+18.3%
Xi'an Triangle Defense 300775.SZChina$1.50B-39%-29%2%17.6×31.7%+21.0%
Beijing Beimo High-tech Frictional Material 002985.SZChina$1.46B-17%+36%28%38.2×n/an/a
Aerospace Industrial Development 2634.TWTaiwan$1.46B+3%+3%6%19.5×4.1%+11.0%
Chemring CHG.LUnited Kingdom$1.92B+13%-4%13%27.0×n/an/a
Beijing Highlander Digital Technology 300065.SZChina$1.44B-48%-32%-1%78.8×n/an/a
Ligeance Aerospace Technology 000697.SZChina$1.94B-9%+24%-10%n/an/an/a
Sensofusion SENSO.HEFinland$1.97Bn/an/a64%n/an/an/a
Cadre CDREUnited States$1.40B+9%+20%11%22.5×16.9%+8.6%
Beijing LeiKe Defense Technology 002413.SZChina$1.39B-46%-5%-6%n/an/an/a
Hefei Jianghang Aircraft Equipment 688586.SSChina$1.38B-11%-4%2%27.1×49.7%+2.6%
Ducommun DCOUnited States$2.04B-1%+9%10%27.6×n/an/a
Bodycote BOY.LUnited Kingdom$2.09B+35%+2%15%18.1×22.6%+4.0%
AECC Aero Science And Technology 600391.SSChina$2.13B+16%-15%4%253.6×29.7%+9.7%

Applied Aerospace & Defense backlog

Applied Aerospace & Defense reported $948M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Jun 2026.

Questions

Which companies are Applied Aerospace & Defense's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Montana Aerospace (AERO.SW), Avio (AVIO.MI), MTAR Technologies (MTARTECH.NS), Aequs (AEQUS.NS), Redwire (RDW), China Marine Information Electronics (600764.SS), Cirrus Aircraft (2507.HK), Xi'an Triangle Defense (300775.SZ).
Is Applied Aerospace & Defense expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.4× against a peer median of 27.1×, 7th cheapest of 16 in its peer set.
What is Applied Aerospace & Defense's backlog?
Applied Aerospace & Defense's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $948M at 30 Jun 2026.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.