Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › PRN.L Princes Group PlcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Princes Group PlcPRN.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Consumer Staples›Beverages: Non-Alcoholic

UK food and drinks manufacturer making canned goods, juices and cooking oils under the Princes and other brands.

≈ A UK Conagra/Del Monte for packaged foodMomentum strong 60
Mkt cap
$1.21B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
38%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$471,897
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.5 pp
WACC 7.0%
Hurdle
-16 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£366.50
1D+4.3%
1W+6.2%
1M+11.7%
3M+9.9%
6M-3.0%
YTD-18.6%
1Y-21.8%
ATR %4.9%
52w lowhigh26.4% off high

What Princes does

UK food and drinks manufacturer making canned goods, juices and cooking oils under the Princes and other brands.

In one line: A UK Conagra/Del Monte for packaged food.

Products and services

  • Canned foods (fish, fruit, vegetables)
  • Juices & soft drinks
  • Cooking oils

Customers

  • UK grocery retailers
  • Foodservice/wholesale

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Staples
  • Packaged food & beverage manufacturing
  • Canned goods, juices, edible oils

What could go right

  • UK grocery private-label/branded demand

What could go wrong

  • Commodity input cost inflation
  • Retailer pricing pressure

Moat: narrow (brand, scale, distribution). Long-established Princes brand with strong UK grocery-retailer shelf presence.

Headquarters: Liverpool, UK · Founded: 1880

Named competitors

Princes at a glance

Size Princes (PRN.L) is a United Kingdom Consumer Staples company (Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) with a market value of $1.21B, the 204th largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £366.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.0%, against +2.1% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 29.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.6%); the operating margin is 4.0% (peer median 8.7%).

Valuation It trades at 12.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.1× (5th cheapest of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.5 points below its cost of capital (7.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 102PRN.L 97
Six months, rebased to 100: Princes against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Princes financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2022FY2021
Revenuen/a£1.87B£1.44B£1.74B£1.44B
Revenue growth—+30%-17%+22%—
Gross profitn/a£383M£235M£267M£253M
EBITDAn/a£147M£67.5M£63.7M£75.4M
Net incomen/a£35.7M-£5.79M-£42.7M£17.2M
Free cash flown/a£124Mn/a-£50.0M-£10.7M
Capital expendituren/a£75.1Mn/a£37.6M£39.8M
Total debtn/a£266M£653M£695M£630M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Princes competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%-10%0%+10%+20%LAS-AFEVR0000190073900506BAG00530024602590000716600962NICL6053372588FIZZ258512341115AKO-BPRN.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Princes is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%10×20×30×LAS-AFEVR0506BAG00530024602590NICL605337FIZZ2585AKO-BPRN.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Princes is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%LAS-AFEVR0000190506005300000716NICL2588FIZZ1234AKO-BPRN.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Princes is the large dot.

Princes competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (PRN.L vs NOMD vs KHC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Princes PRN.L$1.21B-3%+30%4%12.6×-7.1%
Nomad Foods NOMD$1.64B+24%+3%13%7.3×-4.1%
Kraft Heinz KHC$29.2B+5%-2%17%12.5×-3.9%

How Princes compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Princes against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePRN.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+11.7%-0.3%3rd highest of 21
6-month return-3.0%+2.1%8th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-26.4%-21.8%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+29.6%+2.6%3rd highest of 20
Operating margin4.0%8.7%5th lowest of 20
Forward P/E12.6×15.1×5th cheapest of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.1%0.2%4th least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.3%+5.2%3rd highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-16.3 pp-7.8 pp4th least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.5 pp+3.6 pp7th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA4.4×9.1×2nd cheapest of 16
Net debt / EBITDA-1.9×0.7×3rd least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Princes PRN.LUnited Kingdom$1.21B-3%+30%4%12.6×-7.1%+9.3%
Lassonde Industries LAS-A.TOCanada$1.14B+4%+2%9%8.9×-13.2%+8.2%
Fevertree Drinks FEVR.LUnited Kingdom$1.36B+18%+2%9%33.0×27.9%+5.2%
Shenzhen Cereals 000019.SZChina$1.04B-20%+1%6%n/a4.6%-14.3%
NATURECELL 007390.KSSouth Korea$1.04B+14%-15%-18%n/an/an/a
China Foods 0506.HKHong Kong$1.43B+8%+4%8%10.1×-17.0%+4.3%
A.G. BARR p.l.c BAG.LUnited Kingdom$887M-2%+7%15%12.4×n/an/a
LotteChilsung 005300.KSSouth Korea$791M-9%+1%5%11.2×-2.0%+12.0%
China Resources Beverage (Holdings) 2460.HKHong Kong$2.27B-14%-19%6%18.1×n/an/a
DyDo 2590.TJapan$624M+21%+3%4%17.3×n/an/a
Nanfang Black Sesame 000716.SZChina$590M+2%+5%2%n/a28.5%-10.1%
SDIC Zhonglu Fruit Juice 600962.SSChina$2.62B-1%+100%n/an/an/an/a
Nichols NICL.LUnited Kingdom$539M+18%+3%18%15.1×0.2%+8.1%
Zhe Jiang Li Zi Yuan Food 605337.SSChina$526M-17%-4%12%22.1×n/an/a
Premium Water 2588.TJapan$483M+4%+4%16%n/a-11.0%+7.4%
National Beverage FIZZUnited States$3.48B+6%-2%18%19.2×3.4%+1.9%
Lifedrink 2585.TJapan$410M-12%+21%10%14.6×n/an/a
Hey-Song 1234.TWTaiwan$389M-9%-8%5%n/a10.4%+0.7%
Suja Life SUJAUnited States$382Mn/an/a-6%57.6×n/an/a
5100 Xizang Glacier 1115.HKHong Kong$349M-10%+67%21%n/an/an/a
Embotelladora Andina S.A. Sponsored ADR Pfd AKO-BUnited States$4.26B+7%+10%13%14.6×-4.2%+10.4%

Questions

Who are Princes's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nomad Foods (NOMD), Bakkavor Group (private or unlisted), Kraft Heinz (KHC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Lassonde Industries (LAS-A.TO), Fevertree Drinks (FEVR.L), Shenzhen Cereals (000019.SZ), NATURECELL (007390.KS), China Foods (0506.HK), A.G. BARR p.l.c (BAG.L).
Is Princes expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.6× against a peer median of 15.1×, 5th cheapest of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Princes stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.0% against +2.1% for the median peer; over one year -21.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.