Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › OSW OneSpaWorld Holdings Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

OneSpaWorld Holdings Ltd.OSWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Other Consumer Services

Operates spa, fitness and beauty services onboard cruise ships and at land-based destination resorts.

Momentum leader 93
Mkt cap
$3.12B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$28.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.7 pp
WACC 9.0%
Hurdle
-32 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · USD$31.13
1D+1.3%
1W+3.0%
1M+32.5%
3M+20.7%
6M+25.4%
YTD+50.1%
1Y+40.0%
ATR %3.3%
Beta0.93
52w lowhigh1.7% off high

What OneSpaWorld does

Operates spa, fitness and beauty services onboard cruise ships and at land-based destination resorts.

Holds exclusive concessions on cruise ships, selling treatments, fitness and beauty products to passengers and paying the cruise line a commission or fee for the space, so passenger numbers and onboard spending drive it. It was formed in 2019 by merging with a blank-check company.

Products and services

  • Cruise ship spa/wellness services
  • Destination resort spa services
  • Retail beauty product sales

Customers

  • Cruise passengers
  • Resort guests

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Travel/leisure services
  • Onboard spa & wellness services

What could go right

  • Cruise industry passenger volume growth
  • New ship deployments/contract renewals

What could go wrong

  • Cruise industry demand cyclicality
  • Dependence on a few large cruise line contracts

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, installed base). Long-term exclusive service contracts with major cruise lines create high switching costs for the cruise operators.

Headquarters: Nassau, Bahamas · Founded: 2004 · Employees: 5,395

Named competitors

  • Canyon Ranch private or unlisted
  • Resort/hotel spa operators (fragmented) private or unlisted

OneSpaWorld at a glance

Size OneSpaWorld (OSW) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Other Consumer Services) with a market value of $3.12B, the 1520th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $31.13 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 25.4%, against -1.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.5%); the operating margin is 9.7% (peer median 13.3%).

Valuation It trades at 24.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.0× (2nd most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +51%, so the hurdle is -32 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.7 points above its cost of capital (9.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026OSW 130Peer median 102
Six months, rebased to 100: OneSpaWorld against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

OneSpaWorld financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.03B$961M$895M$794M$546M
Revenue growth—+7%+13%+45%—
Gross profit$125M$106M$97.3M$73.4M$30.9M
EBITDA$131M$113M$103M$78.3M$37.8M
Net income$84.8M$71.6M$72.9M-$2.97M$53.2M
Free cash flow$94.3M$68.4M$72.1M$58.0M$19.9M
Capital expenditure$13.9M$15.1M$6.74M$5.42M$4.83M
Total debt$79.3M$94.4M$113M$171M$227M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

OneSpaWorld competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%LRN3012970780JET2CVSAVACIRCTCPTONBYDTUI1BFITVVVPLNT2371DRVN4666GHCFLTPRDOSAGAOSW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. OneSpaWorld is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%10×20×30×LRN0780JET2CVSAIRCTCPTONBYDTUI1BFITVVVPLNT2371DRVN4666GHCPRDOSAGAOSWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. OneSpaWorld is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%LRN0780CVSAVACIRCTCPTONBYDTUI1BFITVVV4666FLTPRDOSAGAOSWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. OneSpaWorld is the large dot.

OneSpaWorld competitors and peer comparison

How OneSpaWorld compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

OneSpaWorld against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureOSWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+32.5%+4.6%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+25.4%-1.8%6th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-1.7%-24.4%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.8%+10.5%11th highest of 21
Operating margin9.7%13.3%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E24.5×12.0×2nd most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)19.5%5.6%2nd most demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+51.4%+14.9%highest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-31.9 pp-15.7 pp3rd least demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.7 pp+5.2 pp10th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA24.2×9.7×most expensive of 20
Net debt / EBITDA0.4×1.4×8th least indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
OneSpaWorld OSWUnited States$3.12B+25%+10%10%24.5×19.5%+51.4%
Stride LRNUnited States$3.15B-15%+2%19%9.5×-19.1%+10.4%
Ferrotec (An Hui) Technology Development 301297.SZChina$3.21B-30%+37%10%n/an/an/a
Tongcheng Travel 0780.HKHong Kong$3.38B-37%+15%17%6.1×-15.0%+25.8%
Jet2 JET2.LUnited Kingdom$3.61B+34%+4%6%11.1×n/an/a
Covista CVSAUnited States$3.67B-18%+9%20%12.0×-3.7%+16.6%
Marriott Vacations Worldwide VACUnited States$3.80B+43%+5%11%11.4×7.7%+11.8%
Indian Railway Catering & Tourism IRCTC.NSIndia$3.87B-20%+15%30%24.2×28.7%+46.4%
Peloton Interactive PTONUnited States$2.50B-1%-2%9%18.7×7.2%-9.5%
Boyd Group Services BYD.TOCanada$2.48B-24%+16%5%22.1×9.4%+16.0%
Tui TUI1.DEGermany$4.31B+17%-2%4%7.4×-2.0%+24.9%
Basic-Fit BFIT.ASNetherlands$2.23B+2%+18%12%22.0×6.5%+30.4%
Valvoline VVVUnited States$4.44B-2%+16%18%19.4×10.3%-6.2%
Planet Fitness PLNTUnited States$4.56B+31%+13%31%17.3×4.8%+26.6%
Kakaku.com 2371.TJapan$4.63B+42%+17%27%31.3×4.6%+13.0%
Driven Brands DRVNUnited States$1.96B-11%-11%15%9.6×3.3%+15.5%
Park24 4666.TJapan$1.93B-2%+4%10%6.8×-5.2%+8.6%
Graham GHCUnited States$5.05B+7%+4%6%16.4×8.6%+11.2%
Flight Centre Travel FLT.AXAustralia$1.72B+17%+3%7%11.4×8.5%+48.5%
Perdoceo Education PRDOUnited States$1.68B-25%+12%25%9.1×-16.0%+4.2%
Saga SAGA.LUnited Kingdom$1.67B+56%+37%16%18.6×12.6%+14.3%

Questions

Who are OneSpaWorld's main competitors?
Named competitors: Canyon Ranch (private or unlisted), Resort/hotel spa operators (fragmented) (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Stride (LRN), Ferrotec (An Hui) Technology Development (301297.SZ), Tongcheng Travel (0780.HK), Jet2 (JET2.L), Covista (CVSA), Marriott Vacations Worldwide (VAC).
Is OneSpaWorld expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.5× against a peer median of 12.0×, 2nd most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +51%, so the hurdle is -32 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has OneSpaWorld stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +25.4% against -1.8% for the median peer; over one year +40.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.