Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 4666.T Park24 Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Park24 Co., Ltd.4666.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Other Consumer Services

Japan's largest parking lot operator (Times brand), also running car-sharing and car-rental services.

≈ A Japanese SP+ (parking) combined with ZipcarMomentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$1.93B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
77%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$19.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.2 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
45 days
21 Dec 2026
Close · JPY¥1,784
1D-4.0%
1W+1.9%
1M+2.3%
3M-8.6%
6M-2.4%
YTD-14.6%
1Y-1.4%
ATR %2.9%
52w lowhigh23.4% off high

What Park24 does

Japan's largest parking lot operator (Times brand), also running car-sharing and car-rental services.

Mostly leases small plots of land, installs payment machines and keeps the hourly or daily parking fees, paying the landowner rent, so occupancy of its lots and rent levels set profit. It also runs lots under management contracts, and car-sharing is a growing sideline.

In one line: A Japanese SP+ (parking) combined with Zipcar.

Products and services

  • Times parking lots
  • Car sharing (Times Car)
  • Car rental

Customers

  • Drivers needing parking
  • Car-sharing/rental customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Parking and mobility services
  • Parking lots, car sharing, car rental

What could go right

  • Car-sharing adoption growth
  • Urban parking demand

What could go wrong

  • Declining car ownership in dense cities

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, network effects). Largest network of parking locations in Japan creates convenience and site-acquisition advantages.

Headquarters: Nagoya, Japan · Founded: 1965 · Employees: 5,734

Named competitors

Park24 at a glance

Size Park24 (4666.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Other Consumer Services) with a market value of $1.93B, the 500th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,784 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.4%, against -11.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.6%); the operating margin is 10.0% (peer median 13.3%).

Valuation It trades at 6.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.4× (2nd cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.2 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 21 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20264666.T 98Peer median 88
Six months, rebased to 100: Park24 against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Park24 financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-10-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥414B¥406B¥371B¥330B¥290B
Revenue growth—+10%+12%+14%—
Gross profit¥111B¥104B¥102B¥89.6B¥70.6B
EBITDA¥80.6B¥74.4B¥73.9B¥63.5B¥52.2B
Net income¥42.3B¥15.9B¥18.6B¥17.5B¥2.48B
Free cash flow¥6.64B¥21.9B¥26.7B¥26.6B¥16.2B
Capital expenditure¥63.7B¥45.6B¥36.1B¥29.1B¥17.1B
Total debt¥172B¥173B¥144B¥171B¥195B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Park24 competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%DRVNFLTPRDOSAGABFIT603099BYDPTON0697ACADOSWLRN301297STRA0004300780301215JET2CVSAVAC4666.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Park24 is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×60×DRVNFLTPRDOSAGABFIT603099BYDPTON0697ACADOSWLRNSTRA0780CVSA4666.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Park24 is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%DRVNFLTPRDOSAGABFIT603099BYDPTON0697ACADOSWLRNSTRA0780CVSA4666.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Park24 is the large dot.

Park24 competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (4666.T vs 2353.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Park24 4666.T$1.93B-2%+4%10%6.8×-5.2%
Nippon Parking Development 2353.T$527M+8%+11%21%13.8×-7.8%

How Park24 compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Park24 against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure4666.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.3%+3.4%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-2.4%-11.4%10th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-23.4%-28.4%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.5%+8.6%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.0%13.3%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E6.8×11.4×2nd cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-5.2%6.9%5th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.6%+15.4%4th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-13.8 pp-18.5 pp8th most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.2 pp+2.7 pp7th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA5.5×8.3×6th cheapest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA1.8×1.1×8th most indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Park24 4666.TJapan$1.93B-2%+4%10%6.8×-5.2%+8.6%
Driven Brands DRVNUnited States$1.96B-11%-11%15%9.6×3.3%+15.5%
Flight Centre Travel FLT.AXAustralia$1.72B+17%+3%7%11.4×8.5%+48.5%
Perdoceo Education PRDOUnited States$1.68B-25%+12%25%9.1×-16.0%+4.2%
Saga SAGA.LUnited Kingdom$1.67B+56%+37%16%18.6×12.6%+14.3%
Basic-Fit BFIT.ASNetherlands$2.23B+2%+18%12%22.0×6.5%+30.4%
Changbai Mountain Tourism 603099.SSChina$1.54B+8%+2%20%71.9×15.4%+39.7%
Boyd Group Services BYD.TOCanada$2.48B-24%+16%5%22.1×9.4%+16.0%
Peloton Interactive PTONUnited States$2.50B-1%-2%9%18.7×7.2%-9.5%
Shoucheng 0697.HKHong Kong$1.33B-27%-1%16%15.5×21.2%+15.3%
AcadeMedia ACAD.STSweden$1.22B+20%+8%7%9.9×-1.8%+8.7%
OneSpaWorld OSWUnited States$3.12B+25%+10%10%24.5×19.5%+51.4%
Stride LRNUnited States$3.15B-15%+2%19%9.5×-19.1%+10.4%
Ferrotec (An Hui) Technology Development 301297.SZChina$3.21B-30%+37%10%n/an/an/a
Strategic Education STRAUnited States$1.16B-35%+4%16%7.9×-12.6%+4.3%
Zhang Jia Jie Tourism 000430.SZChina$1.15B-22%+20%-81%n/an/an/a
Tongcheng Travel 0780.HKHong Kong$3.38B-37%+15%17%6.1×-15.0%+25.8%
CATARC Automotive Proving Ground 301215.SZChina$1.10B-12%+23%43%n/an/an/a
Jet2 JET2.LUnited Kingdom$3.61B+34%+4%6%11.1×n/an/a
Covista CVSAUnited States$3.67B-18%+9%20%12.0×-3.7%+16.6%
Marriott Vacations Worldwide VACUnited States$3.80B+43%+5%11%11.4×7.7%+11.8%

Questions

Who are Park24's main competitors?
Named competitors: Mitsubishi Estate Parking (private or unlisted), Nippon Rent-A-Car (private or unlisted), Nippon Parking Development (2353.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Driven Brands (DRVN), Flight Centre Travel (FLT.AX), Perdoceo Education (PRDO), Saga (SAGA.L), Basic-Fit (BFIT.AS), Changbai Mountain Tourism (603099.SS).
Is Park24 expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.8× against a peer median of 11.4×, 2nd cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Park24 stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.4% against -11.4% for the median peer; over one year -1.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.