Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LTMC.MI Lottomatica Group S.P.A.Open in the cockpit ↗

Lottomatica Group S.P.A.LTMC.MICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Italy · EUR·Consumer Discretionary›Casinos/Gaming

Italian gaming operator running lottery, sports betting and gaming machine operations, including the Lotto game.

Momentum leader 86
Mkt cap
$7.17B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$28.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.6 pp
WACC 5.9%
Hurdle
-44 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
123 days
9 Mar 2027
Close · EUR€27.57
1D+0.3%
1W+6.4%
1M+12.9%
3M+12.9%
6M+4.0%
YTD+23.1%
1Y+43.6%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh2.5% off high

What Lottomatica does

Italian gaming operator running lottery, sports betting and gaming machine operations, including the Lotto game.

Takes a margin on money staked rather than selling a product: sports betting and online games, plus slot and video-lottery machines placed in licensed venues, with the state taking a large share through gaming taxes. Online has been the faster-growing side as customers move from betting shops.

Products and services

  • Lottery (Lotto concession)
  • Sports betting
  • Gaming machines (slot/VLT)
  • Online gaming

Customers

  • Italian consumers, licensed retail betting shops

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Discretionary
  • Gaming/gambling
  • Lottery, betting & gaming machines

What could go right

  • Online gaming migration from retail
  • Sports betting market growth

What could go wrong

  • Gaming tax/regulatory changes
  • Concession renewal risk

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, scale, brand). Long-term state lottery concession creates a regulated, high-barrier gaming franchise.

Headquarters: Rome, Italy · Employees: 2,565

Named competitors

Lottomatica at a glance

Size Lottomatica (LTMC.MI) is an Italy Consumer Discretionary company (Casinos/Gaming) with a market value of $7.17B, the 35th largest of 123 Italy companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €27.57 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 4.0%, against -13.2% for the median peer and +3.1% for the Italy market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.1%); the operating margin is 20.9% (peer median 18.5%).

Valuation It trades at 15.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.6× (5th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +43%, so the hurdle is -44 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.6 points above its cost of capital (5.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026LTMC.MI 106Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Lottomatica against the median of its 19 peers (local-currency closes).

Lottomatica financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€2.29B€2.25B€2.00B€1.63B€1.39B
Revenue growth—+12%+23%+17%—
Gross profit€922M€902M€750M€624M€514M
EBITDA€752M€712M€615M€520M€400M
Net income€220M€174M€98.6M€67.9M€72.1M
Free cash flow€481M€447M€301M€229M€289M
Capital expenditure€236M€229M€181M€123M€91.1M
Total debt€2.41B€2.06B€2.03B€2.01B€1.86B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lottomatica competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%MGMLNWWYNNCZRSGHCBYD22821928FLUT1128RSI0027PENNLVSALLLTMC.MI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lottomatica is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%10×15×20×25×MGMLNWWYNNSGHCBYD22821928ENTFLUT1128RSIPENN035250ALLBRSLLTMC.MIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lottomatica is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%MGMLNWWYNNCZRSGHC22821928FDJUENTFLUT1128RSIPENNLVSALLLTMC.MIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Lottomatica is the large dot.

Lottomatica competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LTMC.MI vs FLUT vs ENT.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Lottomatica LTMC.MI$7.17B+4%+4%21%15.4×-1.4%
Flutter Entertainment FLUT$14.2B-19%+12%2%14.3×26.3%
Entain ENT.L$4.05B-11%0%11%8.9×3.2%

How Lottomatica compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lottomatica against its 19 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLTMC.MIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+12.9%+4.9%2nd highest of 20
6-month return+4.0%-13.2%5th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-2.5%-37.3%2nd highest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.0%+6.1%10th lowest of 20
Operating margin20.9%18.5%10th highest of 20
Forward P/E15.4×12.6×5th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.4%2.6%6th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+42.7%+26.8%2nd highest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-44.1 pp-19.5 pp2nd least demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.6 pp+6.5 pp9th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA11.3×8.4×6th most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA2.7×2.8×9th least indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Lottomatica LTMC.MIItaly$7.17B+4%+4%21%15.4×-1.4%+42.7%
MGM Resorts MGMUnited States$8.18B-17%+3%6%24.0×16.0%+27.7%
Light & Wonder, Inc. Shs Chess Depository Interests Repr 1 Sh LNW.AXAustralia$6.22B+1%0%27%9.4×-8.5%+15.8%
Wynn Resorts WYNNUnited States$8.56B-19%+6%16%20.8×1.7%+27.8%
Caesars Entertainment CZRUnited States$5.96B+4%+3%17%n/a5.8%+25.9%
Super Group (SGHC) SGHCUnited States$5.77B-13%+14%23%11.7×-0.2%+16.6%
Boyd Gaming BYDUnited States$5.41B-11%0%19%10.1×n/an/a
MGM China 2282.HKHong Kong$4.85B-12%+11%31%9.3×-3.1%+48.5%
Sands China 1928.HKHong Kong$11.4B-30%+9%26%12.9×2.5%+34.0%
FDJ United FDJU.PAFrance$4.49B-5%+3%15%10.6×-2.8%+13.9%
Entain ENT.LUnited Kingdom$4.05B-11%0%11%8.9×3.2%+8.1%
Flutter Entertainment FLUTUnited States$14.2B-19%+12%2%14.3×26.3%+23.7%
Wynn Macau 1128.HKHong Kong$2.99B-24%+9%29%8.7×-2.4%+31.1%
Rush Street Interactive RSIUnited States$2.83B-56%+39%11%16.9×13.5%+32.4%
Galaxy Ent 0027.HKHong Kong$19.4B+8%+8%32%14.2×2.8%+28.7%
PENN Entertainment PENNUnited States$2.34B+4%+6%6%12.3×15.2%+14.2%
Kangwonland 035250.KSSouth Korea$2.13B-16%+2%15%11.0×n/an/a
Las Vegas Sands LVSUnited States$25.5B-23%+11%22%14.2×-2.5%+34.7%
Aristocrat Leisure ALL.AXAustralia$26.9B+27%-1%32%24.8×9.5%+8.8%
Brightstar Lottery BRSLUnited States$1.82B-24%+1%25%15.2×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Lottomatica's main competitors?
Named competitors: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT), Entain (ENT.L), IGT (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes MGM Resorts (MGM), Light & Wonder, Inc. Shs Chess Depository Interests Repr 1 Sh (LNW.AX), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), Caesars Entertainment (CZR), Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC), Boyd Gaming (BYD).
Is Lottomatica expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.4× against a peer median of 12.6×, 5th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +43%, so the hurdle is -44 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Lottomatica stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +4.0% against -13.2% for the median peer; over one year +43.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.