Loading…

Las Vegas SandsLVSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Casinos/Gaming

Casino and integrated resort operator focused on Asia, owning Marina Bay Sands in Singapore and casino resorts in Macau.

Momentum weak 39
Mkt cap
$25.5B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
42%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$261M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+11.5 pp
WACC 7.5%
Hurdle
-37 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
82 days
27 Jan 2027
Close · USD$40.73
1D-0.5%
1W+10.2%
1M+12.8%
3M-10.4%
6M-23.3%
YTD-36.7%
1Y-34.1%
ATR %2.8%
Beta0.52
52w lowhigh41.5% off high

What Las Vegas Sands does

Casino and integrated resort operator focused on Asia, owning Marina Bay Sands in Singapore and casino resorts in Macau.

Earns from gambling on its casino floors, plus hotel rooms, shopping-mall rents and convention business at its resorts. It sold its Las Vegas properties in 2022 and is now an Asia-only operator, with Macau run through the majority-held, Hong Kong-listed Sands China.

Products and services

  • Marina Bay Sands (Singapore)
  • Sands China (Macau resorts)

Customers

  • Asian and global gaming/leisure tourists

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Casinos/gaming
  • Integrated casino resort operation…

What could go right

  • Asian gaming/tourism recovery (China visitation)
  • Singapore MBS expansion capacity

What could go wrong

  • China macro/regulatory risk affecting Macau visitation
  • Licence renewal/regulatory conditions in gaming jurisdictions

Moat: wide (regulatory licence, scale, installed base). Scarce casino licences in Singapore and Macau, plus massive integrated-resort scale, are extremely hard to replicate.

Headquarters: Las Vegas, Nevada, US · Founded: 1988 · Employees: 41,500

Named competitors

Las Vegas Sands at a glance

Size Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Casinos/Gaming) with a market value of $25.5B, the 419th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $40.73 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 23.3%, against -16.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.4%); the operating margin is 22.4% (peer median 20.9%).

Valuation It trades at 14.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.4× (2nd cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +35%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.5 points above its cost of capital (7.5% WACC).

Credit Las Vegas Sands has 15 bonds outstanding ($10.5B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 128 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 3.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 27 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 87LVS 78
Six months, rebased to 100: Las Vegas Sands against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Las Vegas Sands financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$13.6B$13.0B$11.3B$10.4B$4.11B
Revenue growth—+15%+9%+152%—
Gross profit$4.97B$4.94B$4.15B$3.90B$614M
EBITDA$4.54B$4.63B$3.89B$3.68B$266M
Net income$1.61B$1.63B$1.45B$1.22B-$1.02B
Free cash flow$2.40B$1.65B$1.58B$2.18B-$1.59B
Capital expenditure$1.09B$1.24B$1.58B$1.26B$780M
Total debt$15.4B$16.0B$13.9B$14.3B$16.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Las Vegas Sands competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%0%+5%+10%ALL0027FLUT1928WYNNMGMLTMCLVS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Las Vegas Sands is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%15×20×25×ALL0027FLUT1928WYNNMGMLTMCLVSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Las Vegas Sands is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%ALL0027FLUT1928WYNNMGMLTMCLVSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Las Vegas Sands is the large dot.

Las Vegas Sands competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LVS vs WYNN vs MGM vs MLCO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Las Vegas Sands LVS$25.5B-23%+11%22%14.2×-2.5%
Wynn Resorts WYNN$8.56B-19%+6%16%20.8×1.7%
MGM Resorts MGM$8.18B-17%+3%6%24.0×16.0%
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. Sponsored ADR MLCO$1.79B-16%+6%12%7.5×-6.2%
Galaxy Ent 0027.HK$19.4B+8%+8%32%14.2×2.8%

How Las Vegas Sands compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Las Vegas Sands against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLVSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+12.8%+9.2%3rd highest of 8
6-month return-23.3%-16.6%2nd lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-41.5%-37.3%3rd lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.9%+6.4%2nd highest of 8
Operating margin22.4%20.9%4th highest of 8
Forward P/E14.2×15.4×2nd cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-2.5%2.8%least demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+34.7%+27.8%2nd highest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-37.1 pp-25.9 pp2nd least demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital+11.5 pp+4.0 pphighest of 8
EV / EBITDA8.5×11.3×2nd cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA2.8×2.8×4th most indebted of 8
Bond spread128 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Las Vegas Sands LVSUnited States$25.5B-23%+11%22%14.2×-2.5%+34.7%
Aristocrat Leisure ALL.AXAustralia$26.9B+27%-1%32%24.8×9.5%+8.8%
Galaxy Ent 0027.HKHong Kong$19.4B+8%+8%32%14.2×2.8%+28.7%
Flutter Entertainment FLUTUnited States$14.2B-19%+12%2%14.3×26.3%+23.7%
Sands China 1928.HKHong Kong$11.4B-30%+9%26%12.9×2.5%+34.0%
Wynn Resorts WYNNUnited States$8.56B-19%+6%16%20.8×1.7%+27.8%
MGM Resorts MGMUnited States$8.18B-17%+3%6%24.0×16.0%+27.7%
Lottomatica LTMC.MIItaly$7.17B+4%+4%21%15.4×-1.4%+42.7%

Las Vegas Sands bonds and credit

Las Vegas Sands has 15 bonds outstanding with $10.5B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 5.82%, a spread of 128 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Las Vegas Sands's main competitors?
Named competitors: Wynn Resorts (WYNN), MGM Resorts (MGM China) (MGM), Melco Resorts (MLCO), Galaxy Entertainment (0027.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Aristocrat Leisure (ALL.AX), Galaxy Ent (0027.HK), Flutter Entertainment (FLUT), Sands China (1928.HK), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), MGM Resorts (MGM).
Is Las Vegas Sands expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.2× against a peer median of 15.4×, 2nd cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +35%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Las Vegas Sands stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -23.3% against -16.6% for the median peer; over one year -34.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.